Homeschool · Diploma track · Grade 12

English 12

A full year of British literature for grade 12, built to be the student's whole English course rather than a supplement. The year runs from Beowulf to the modernists, a thousand years in six units, chosen so a student leaves school able to open an unfamiliar English poem, place it in a tradition, and say what it is doing. Each lesson teaches the idea, works through a real passage, and then asks you to do the same thing yourself, with a full model answer for every question. Every text discussed is public domain and quoted directly rather than summarized.

DIPLOMA TRACK CA CCSS ELA 11-12 GRADE 12 36-WEEK SCHEDULE MODEL ANSWERS 52 LESSONS 580 PRACTICE QUESTIONS 6 ESSAY PROMPTS English 11 or equivalent. This is a complete course and does not assume other instruction.

Course overview

What this year covers

Twelfth grade covers a thousand years of British literature, which sounds impossible until you notice that coverage is not the point. The point is that a student finishing high school should be able to open an unfamiliar English poem, identify what tradition it belongs to, name what it is doing formally, and say why that matters. Six units, each anchored to a period and to the techniques that period invented: the alliterative line, the sonnet and the soliloquy, the heroic couplet and the Romantic lyric, the dramatic monologue and the serialized novel, modernist fragmentation, and then a documented comparative capstone. The year is built on the California CCSS ELA standards for the grades 11 to 12 band, which are recurring skills rather than topics, so they are taught where the texts call for them rather than one per lesson. Fifty-two lessons, 580 practice questions with full model answers, and six timed essay prompts in literary analysis, comparison and argument. Every text is public domain, so there is no reading list to buy.

The 36-week reading schedule. Weeks 1 to 2: the Old English alliterative line, and Beowulf lines 1 to 1250 in Gummere's 1910 verse translation. Week 3: Beowulf, the Grendel and Grendel's mother episodes. Week 4: Beowulf, the dragon and the funeral. Week 5: The Wanderer and The Seafarer. Weeks 6 to 7: Chaucer's General Prologue in Middle English with glosses, then the Pardoner's and Wife of Bath's prologues. Week 8: Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Weeks 9 to 10: the sonnet, Petrarchan and English, in Wyatt, Surrey, Sidney, Spenser and Shakespeare. Week 11: Marlowe's Doctor Faustus, the opening and closing scenes. Weeks 12 to 13: Hamlet, read whole. Week 14: Macbeth, acts 1 and 2 and the sleepwalking scene. Week 15: Donne's Songs and Sonnets and the Holy Sonnets. Week 16: Paradise Lost, book 1. Weeks 17 to 18: Pope, An Essay on Criticism and The Rape of the Lock. Week 19: Johnson and Gray. Weeks 20 to 21: the Lyrical Ballads preface, Tintern Abbey, and The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Week 22: Blake's Songs of Innocence and of Experience. Week 23: Keats's odes. Week 24: Shelley and Byron. Weeks 25 to 26: Tennyson and Browning. Week 27: Arnold and Hardy. Weeks 28 to 29: Dickens, Hard Times, read whole. Week 30: Jane Eyre, the Thornfield and Moor House chapters. Weeks 31 to 32: Yeats and Eliot's Prufrock. Week 33: Heart of Darkness. Week 34: Mrs Dalloway and Dubliners. Week 35: the war poets. Week 36: the capstone essay, drafted and revised.

  • U1Unit 1: Old and Middle English8 lessons
  • U2Unit 2: The Renaissance9 lessons
  • U3Unit 3: Enlightenment and Romanticism9 lessons
  • U4Unit 4: The Victorians9 lessons
  • U5Unit 5: Modernism9 lessons
  • U6Unit 6: Comparison and the Capstone8 lessons

All six units are open, 52 lessons in all. Every lesson opens with the method, one extended worked example, and ten practice problems. Every problem has a full worked solution, so you can find the step where yours went wrong. Each unit closes with a ten-problem mixed review.

Free preview: open any 5 lessons without an account. The counter on the left keeps track.

Lesson 1.1 · Unit 1 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.4

How Old English verse actually works

English poetry did not begin with rhyme and it did not begin with counting syllables. For its first six hundred years it was built on stressed beats and repeated consonants, and knowing the machinery makes the whole tradition that follows legible.

The key ideas
  1. Old English is the language spoken in England from about 450 to 1100, and it is not readable without training.
  2. The alliterative line has four stresses, two on each side of a pause called the caesura.
  3. Alliteration binds the halves together, with at least one stress in the first half matching the third stress.
  4. The third stress is the key, and the fourth stress never alliterates.
  5. A kenning is a compressed metaphorical compound, such as whale-road for sea or ring-giver for king.
  6. Variation is the other main device, naming a thing several ways in succession rather than once.
  7. The verse was composed for performance, which explains why the devices are all devices of sound.
  8. Francis Gummere's 1910 verse translation keeps the alliteration and is in the public domain.

Where students lose marks: calling alliteration decoration. In Old English verse it is structural, the way rhyme is structural in a sonnet, and a line that failed to alliterate would not be a line at all.

Worked example

The text. Beowulf, composed between the eighth and eleventh centuries, translated by Francis Gummere, 1910. Public domain.

Lo, praise of the prowess of people-kings
of spear-armed Danes, in days long sped,
we have heard, and what honor the athelings won!
Oft Scyld the Scefing from squadroned foes,
from many a tribe, the mead-bench tore,
awing the earls.

Step one: find the four stresses. "Lo, praise of the PROWESS of PEOPLE-kings // of SPEAR-armed DANES". Two beats, pause, two beats. Every line in the poem is built this way.

Step two: locate the alliteration. Prowess and people in the first half, spear in the second. The p sounds bind the first half together and the line continues by sound rather than by grammar.

Step three: read the caesura. The pause is not punctuation but breath. A performer paused there, which gave the audience a beat to absorb the half-line and gave the performer a beat to assemble the next one.

Step four: identify the kennings. "People-kings", "spear-armed Danes", "ring-giver", "whale-road", "bone-house" for body. A kenning is a metaphor compressed into a compound noun, and it supplies a word of the right shape when the alliteration needs one.

Step five: state why kennings exist. A poet composing aloud needs several words for the same thing, each starting with a different sound, so the line can be completed whatever letter the alliteration requires. The figurative richness is a by-product of a technical need.

Step six: notice variation. "From squadroned foes, / from many a tribe." The same enemies named twice in different terms. Old English verse advances by restating rather than by adding, which is why it feels slower than later English poetry.

Step seven: read "the mead-bench tore". Scyld tore away the mead-benches of his enemies, which means he destroyed their halls. The hall is where a lord feeds his followers, so taking the benches is not vandalism but the dismantling of a society.

Step eight: state the reading method for the unit. Ask what the sound is doing before asking what the content means. In a poetry built for the ear, the argument arrives through the pattern, and a reader who reads it silently as prose has removed most of the poem.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. What period does Old English cover?
    Show the full solution

    About 450 to 1100

  2. Describe the structure of the alliterative line.
    Show the full solution

    Four stresses, two on each side of a caesura

  3. Which stress never alliterates?
    Show the full solution

    The fourth

  4. Define a kenning and give two examples.
    Show the full solution

    A metaphorical compound: whale-road for sea, ring-giver for king

  5. Whose translation does this course use, and when was it made?
    Show the full solution

    Francis Gummere's, 1910

  6. Why is alliteration structural rather than decorative here?
    Show the full solution

    Because it is what binds the two halves of the line into one line. A half-line without a matching sound in the other half is not joined to anything, exactly as an unrhymed line in a sonnet would break the form. Alliteration does the work rhyme does later, which is why it cannot be removed without destroying the verse. It joins the half-lines, as rhyme later joins a stanza

  7. Explain why kennings exist, technically.
    Show the full solution

    A poet composing aloud needs several names for the same thing, each beginning with a different sound, so the line can be completed whatever the alliteration demands. Sea can be whale-road, swan-path or the gannet's bath depending on the letter needed. The figurative richness is a by-product of a technical requirement. They supply synonyms with different initial sounds

  8. What does variation do to the pace of the verse?
    Show the full solution

    It slows it. "From squadroned foes, from many a tribe" names the same enemies twice in different terms, so the poem advances by restating rather than by adding. A modern reader expecting new information in every clause experiences this as repetition; an audience hearing it once experiences it as emphasis and as time to absorb. It advances by restating, which slows the line

  9. Analyze "the mead-bench tore".
    Show the full solution

    Scyld destroyed his enemies' mead-benches, which means he destroyed their halls. The hall is where a lord feeds his followers and distributes treasure, so it is the physical center of the bond that holds a society together. Taking the benches is not vandalism but the dismantling of a people, and the detail is chosen for that reason. Destroying the hall dismantles the society, not just a building

  10. State the reading method this unit requires.
    Show the full solution

    Ask what the sound is doing before asking what the content means. In a poetry built for the ear the argument arrives through the pattern of stress and alliteration, so a reader who takes it in silently as prose has removed most of the poem. Reading Old English verse aloud, even in translation, is not an optional enrichment. Read for sound first, because the sound carries the argument

Lesson 1.2 · Unit 1 · RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.3

The heroic code as a contract

Beowulf is often taught as a monster story, and the monsters are the least interesting part of it. The poem is about an economic and social arrangement, and it keeps testing whether that arrangement can survive contact with the world.

The key ideas
  1. Beowulf survives in one manuscript, the Nowell Codex, copied around the year 1000 and damaged by fire in 1731.
  2. The comitatus is the bond between a lord and his retainers, and it is the poem's central institution.
  3. It is reciprocal: the lord gives treasure, feasting and protection, and the retainers give loyalty unto death.
  4. Treasure is not wealth but obligation made visible, which is why the poem inventories gifts in such detail.
  5. Wergild is the man-price, a payment that settles a killing and prevents a feud from continuing.
  6. Lof, meaning fame or praise, is the only form of survival the poem's world offers.
  7. The poet is Christian and the material is pagan, which produces a steady tension the poem never resolves.
  8. The boast is a formal act, in which a warrior states publicly what he will do and becomes accountable for it.

Where students lose marks: treating Beowulf's boasting as a character flaw. The boast is a contract entered into before witnesses, and a warrior who does not make one has offered nothing.

Worked example

The text. Beowulf, Gummere translation, 1910. Public domain. Beowulf addresses Hrothgar before the fight with Grendel.

I had heard of the horror that Grendel wrought
and the Danes' distress; and my seamen said
how the noblest hall, high-built and wide,
stood idle and useless when evening sun
in heaven's hollow had hidden its light.

No sword is needed, were it seemly and right
for me to fell the fiend with fight of hand,
hand-to-hand, as hero to hero.

Step one: notice what the hall's condition signifies. Heorot "stood idle and useless" after dark. The hall is where the comitatus is enacted, through feasting, gift-giving and song, so an unusable hall means the society has stopped functioning.

Step two: state what Grendel actually attacks. Not a building and not individual men but the institution. He cannot be paid off with wergild, and the poem says so explicitly, which is precisely what makes him a horror rather than an enemy.

Step three: work the refusal of the sword. Beowulf discards the weapon and gives a reason: it is "seemly and right" to meet Grendel with equal means. The decision is not recklessness but an appeal to fairness.

Step four: state what that appeal assumes. That Grendel is enough of a person for fairness to apply to him. Beowulf extends the code to a creature the poem has described as a descendant of Cain, which is the first of many places where the code is stretched beyond its design.

Step five: read "hero to hero". The phrase grants Grendel the same status Beowulf claims. Whether that is generosity, arrogance or a category error is genuinely arguable, and an essay can take any of the three positions with evidence.

Step six: place the boast correctly. This speech is made in public before Hrothgar and his court. Having said it, Beowulf cannot use a sword without losing the standing the speech bought him, which is how the boast functions: it converts an intention into an obligation.

Step seven: state what the hero gets in return. Lof, which is fame. The poem's world offers no other durable survival, and the last word of the poem in the original is a form of praise, so the whole structure is aimed at that.

Step eight: state the poem's central question. Whether a system built on reciprocal obligation can hold against something that does not reciprocate. Lessons 1.3 and 1.4 follow the answer through the monsters and then to the dragon.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. In how many manuscripts does Beowulf survive?
    Show the full solution

    One, the Nowell Codex, damaged by fire in 1731

  2. Define the comitatus.
    Show the full solution

    The reciprocal bond between a lord and his retainers

  3. What is wergild?
    Show the full solution

    The man-price paid to settle a killing and stop a feud

  4. What does lof mean?
    Show the full solution

    Fame or praise, the poem's only form of survival

  5. Why does Beowulf refuse a sword?
    Show the full solution

    Because Grendel uses none, and equal means are seemly and right

  6. What does the hall's condition signify?
    Show the full solution

    Heorot standing idle and useless after dark means the society has stopped functioning. The hall is where the comitatus is enacted through feasting, gift-giving and song, so an unusable hall is not an inconvenience but a suspended civilization. The poem measures the disaster in social rather than in physical terms. An unusable hall means the society has stopped working

  7. Why is Grendel a horror rather than merely an enemy?
    Show the full solution

    Because he cannot be settled with. The poem states that he will pay no wergild, which means the mechanism the society uses to end killing does not apply to him. An enemy who can be paid is inside the system; one who cannot is outside it, and the horror is the discovery that the system has an outside. He refuses wergild, so the system cannot reach him

  8. What does "hero to hero" assume about Grendel?
    Show the full solution

    That he is enough of a person for fairness to apply to him. Beowulf extends the heroic code to a creature the poem has called a descendant of Cain, which may be generosity, arrogance or a category error. All three readings are defensible from the text, and choosing one with evidence is what the essay requires. That the code applies to him, which is arguable

  9. Explain what the boast actually does.
    Show the full solution

    It converts an intention into a public obligation. Made before Hrothgar and his court, the speech means Beowulf cannot afterward take up a sword without losing the standing the speech bought him. A warrior who makes no boast has offered nothing and can be held to nothing, which is why reading the boast as vanity misses its function. It binds the speaker publicly to what he has said

  10. State the poem's central question.
    Show the full solution

    Whether a system built on reciprocal obligation can hold against something that does not reciprocate. Grendel takes no settlement, his mother acts on feud logic the code cannot stop, and the dragon wants nothing the code can offer. The poem tests the arrangement three times and the answers get worse. Can reciprocity survive what will not reciprocate

Lesson 1.3 · Unit 1 · RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.4

Grendel, and the monster as a reading problem

Grendel and his mother are the poem's two hardest interpretive problems, because the poem keeps giving them qualities that make them legible as people and then withdrawing those qualities. Neither reading survives the whole text.

The key ideas
  1. Grendel is descended from Cain, which places him inside a biblical frame the pagan material does not have.
  2. He is driven by the noise of the hall, specifically by the song of creation, which the poem states directly.
  3. He is repeatedly called a man, in words the poem also uses for warriors.
  4. He is exiled, joyless and outside the hall, which is the condition the elegies describe as the worst available to a person.
  5. Grendel's mother acts from feud logic, avenging a son, which is precisely what the human characters do.
  6. The poem calls her attack less terrible than Grendel's, because it follows a rule.
  7. The mere is described as an anti-hall, underwater, joyless and roofed with fire.
  8. The monsters are not allegories with fixed meanings, and the poem's refusal to settle them is deliberate.

Where students lose marks: deciding Grendel "represents" something and stopping. Write about what the poem does when it describes him, which is alternately humanize and expel, and about what that alternation produces.

Worked example

The text. Beowulf, Gummere translation, 1910. Public domain.

With envy and anger an evil spirit
endured the dole in his dark abode,
that he heard each day the din of revel
high in the hall: there harps rang out,
clear song of the singer.

So ruled the ruler, and revel was theirs,
till the fiend up-sprang, a hellish fiend,
grim demon that haunted the marshes wild,
the moor and the fen.

Step one: read the first passage for what Grendel feels. Envy and anger, and he "endured the dole", meaning he suffered grief. The poem assigns him an interior before it assigns him a shape.

Step two: state what that establishes. Something capable of envy is capable of wanting to be included. The poem's opening account of its monster is a description of exclusion felt from the inside.

Step three: identify what he actually hears. The harp and the singer, and the song is the poet's account of creation. Grendel is enraged by a creation story he is not part of.

Step four: work the second passage's vocabulary. "Fiend", "hellish", "demon". The same creature is now given no interior at all, only origin and habitat, and the words come from Christian theology rather than from the heroic world.

Step five: state the alternation. The poem humanizes him in one passage and expels him in the next, and it does this repeatedly. A reading that picks one and discards the other is tidying the poem rather than describing it.

Step six: turn to his mother. She kills one man, Aeschere, in payment for her son. That is feud logic, the same reasoning every human character in the poem accepts, and the poem says her raid was less terrible than Grendel's.

Step seven: state the difficulty that produces. Grendel is worse because he follows no rule; his mother is less bad because she follows the same rule the Danes follow. The poem has admitted that its monster acts on the society's own principles.

Step eight: state the finding. The monsters mark the edge of what the heroic code can contain, and the poem will not say whether that edge is a boundary of nature or of definition. Writing about the alternation is the analysis; resolving it is not.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Whom is Grendel descended from?
    Show the full solution

    Cain

  2. What specifically enrages him?
    Show the full solution

    The noise of the hall, and the singer's song of creation

  3. Whom does Grendel's mother kill, and why?
    Show the full solution

    Aeschere, in payment for her son

  4. How does the poem rank her attack against Grendel's?
    Show the full solution

    As less terrible

  5. How is the mere described?
    Show the full solution

    As an anti-hall: underwater, joyless, roofed with fire

  6. What does assigning Grendel envy accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    It gives him an interior before it gives him a shape. Something capable of envy is capable of wanting to be included, so the poem's first account of its monster is a description of exclusion felt from inside. A reader who has been told what Grendel feels cannot afterward treat him as pure appetite. It makes exclusion something he experiences

  7. Why does it matter that he hears a creation song?
    Show the full solution

    Because it specifies what he is excluded from. Not a party but an account of the world's making that has no place for him in it. The rage is at a story rather than at a noise, which raises the stakes considerably and connects the Cain genealogy to what actually happens in the hall. He is enraged by a creation story he is not part of

  8. Describe the alternation in the poem's treatment of Grendel.
    Show the full solution

    One passage gives him envy, grief and an interior; the next gives him only origin and habitat in the vocabulary of Christian demonology. The poem humanizes and expels him in turn, repeatedly. A reading that picks one mode and discards the other is tidying the poem rather than describing what it does. It humanizes him and expels him by turns

  9. Why is Grendel's mother the harder problem?
    Show the full solution

    Because she acts on the society's own principle. She kills one man in payment for a son, which is feud logic, and the poem calls her raid less terrible than Grendel's precisely because it follows a rule. The poem has conceded that its monster reasons the way the Danes reason, which makes the boundary between inside and outside a matter of definition rather than of nature. She follows the same feud logic the humans follow

  10. What is the right way to write about these monsters?
    Show the full solution

    Describe what the poem does when it describes them rather than deciding what they represent. The alternation between interior and expulsion is the evidence, and the poem's refusal to settle it marks the edge of what the heroic code can contain. An essay that names the alternation and argues about its effect will outperform one that assigns a fixed meaning. Write about the alternation, not about what they symbolize

Lesson 1.4 · Unit 1 · RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.5

The dragon, and the ending's verdict on the code

The last third of the poem takes place fifty years later, and it is a different kind of story. Beowulf is a king rather than a young champion, the enemy wants nothing that can be negotiated, and the ending is a funeral with a prophecy attached.

The key ideas
  1. Fifty years pass between the Grendel episode and the dragon, and Beowulf is now an old king.
  2. The dragon is roused by a stolen cup, taken by a fugitive from a hoard nobody was using.
  3. The hoard belonged to a vanished people, whose last survivor buried it in a speech the poem quotes.
  4. Treasure in a hoard is dead, because its entire social function is to be given away.
  5. Beowulf's retainers flee, which is the comitatus failing at its single obligation.
  6. Only Wiglaf stays, and his speech condemns the others in the code's own terms.
  7. The poem ends with a funeral and with a woman's prophecy of the invasion to come.
  8. The treasure is buried again with Beowulf, useless, which is the poem's last image.

Where students lose marks: reading the ending as a celebration. The poem's last movement is a systematic demonstration that everything the code promised has failed to arrive.

Worked example

The text. Beowulf, Gummere translation, 1910. Public domain. The Lay of the Last Survivor, and Wiglaf's rebuke.

Now hold thou, earth, since heroes may not,
what earls have owned! Lo, erst from thee
brave men brought it! But battle-death seized
and cruel killing my clansmen all,
robbed them of life and a liegeman's joys.

Now the sword-gift, surely, and swords bestowed,
and all the estates your ease that gave,
and your kin, shall fail.

Wiglaf

Step one: read who is speaking in the first passage. The last member of a people that no longer exists, burying treasure because there is nobody left to give it to. The poem stops its plot to give him a speech.

Step two: state what that speech argues. Treasure exists to circulate. "Now hold thou, earth, since heroes may not" concedes that the objects have outlived the arrangement that made them meaningful, so the ground can have them.

Step three: connect that to the dragon. A dragon sitting on gold is the exact image of wealth that does not circulate. The poem has spent two thousand lines showing treasure as obligation made visible, and the dragon is that system stopped.

Step four: notice the cause of the disaster. A fugitive takes one cup from a hoard nobody was using. The destruction of a kingdom follows from a theft that harmed no living person, which is a very strange thing for the poem to arrange.

Step five: read the retainers' flight. They run, and the comitatus has one obligation, which is to die with the lord. Everything the code promised is void at the moment it is called in.

Step six: work Wiglaf's rebuke. He does not call them cowards in general terms. He says the gifts, the estates and the standing of their families will fail, which is the precise reciprocal consequence the code specifies.

Step seven: state what the prophecy adds. A woman at the funeral foretells invasion, slavery and slaughter. The poem's last new information is that the Geats are finished, which means Beowulf's fifty years of protection ended with him.

Step eight: state the ending's verdict. The treasure is buried again, the people are doomed, and what survives is lof, the praise the poem itself is. That is either a bleak assessment of the heroic code or a demonstration that poetry is the only thing that actually keeps a promise, and the poem permits both.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. How much time passes before the dragon episode?
    Show the full solution

    Fifty years

  2. What rouses the dragon?
    Show the full solution

    A stolen cup, taken by a fugitive

  3. Who buried the hoard, and why?
    Show the full solution

    The last survivor of a vanished people, because nobody was left to give it to

  4. Who stays with Beowulf?
    Show the full solution

    Wiglaf

  5. What does the woman at the funeral foretell?
    Show the full solution

    Invasion, slavery and slaughter for the Geats

  6. What does the Last Survivor's speech argue?
    Show the full solution

    That treasure exists to circulate. "Now hold thou, earth, since heroes may not" concedes that the objects have outlived the arrangement that gave them meaning, so the ground may as well have them. The poem stops its plot for this speech because the speech states the economics the whole last third depends on. Treasure without circulation is dead, so the earth may keep it

  7. How does the dragon embody the poem's economics?
    Show the full solution

    A dragon sitting on gold is wealth that does not move. The poem has spent two thousand lines presenting treasure as obligation made visible, given by a ring-giver and binding those who receive it, and the dragon is that entire system stopped. The monster is a picture of hoarding rather than of appetite. It is the image of wealth that does not circulate

  8. Why is the cause of the disaster strange?
    Show the full solution

    Because a fugitive takes one cup from a hoard nobody was using, harming no living person, and a kingdom is destroyed as a result. The poem deliberately arranges a catastrophe with a negligible cause, which removes any account of the ending as a punishment earned or a fate deserved. A theft that harmed nobody destroys a kingdom

  9. Analyze Wiglaf's rebuke.
    Show the full solution

    He does not call the retainers cowards in general terms. He says the sword-gifts, the estates and their families' standing will fail, which is exactly the reciprocal consequence the code specifies. The rebuke is delivered in the code's own vocabulary, which makes it a formal finding rather than an insult. He states the code's own penalty, not a general insult

  10. State the ending's verdict on the heroic code.
    Show the full solution

    The retainers flee, the treasure is reburied useless, and the people are prophesied to be destroyed, so everything the code promised is void at the moment it is called in. What survives is lof, the praise, which is the poem itself. That is either a bleak assessment of the arrangement or a claim that poetry is the only thing that keeps its promise, and the text supports both. Everything fails except the praise, which is the poem

Lesson 1.5 · Unit 1 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.9

The Wanderer and The Seafarer

The shorter Old English poems give the emotional cost of the world Beowulf describes. They are spoken by men who have lost the hall, and they are the earliest poems in English about loneliness as a subject in its own right.

The key ideas
  1. Both poems survive in the Exeter Book, a manuscript given to Exeter Cathedral around 1072.
  2. The elegy laments a loss, and in Old English that loss is usually the lord and the hall.
  3. An exile without a lord has no standing, which makes exile the worst condition the culture can name.
  4. The ubi sunt formula asks "where are they now", listing what has gone and answering nothing.
  5. Both poems turn Christian at the end, and whether the turn is earned is a real critical question.
  6. Wyrd, meaning fate or what happens, is the force the speakers name for their condition.
  7. Winter, sea and gray are the standing images, and they are used for states of mind.
  8. The speaker is constructed, and the poems are not autobiography, which matters when writing about them.

Where students lose marks: treating the Christian ending as an add-on by a later scribe. Whatever its origin, it is in the poem, and the strongest essays argue about how it relates to what precedes it rather than deleting it.

Worked example

The texts. The Wanderer and The Seafarer, from the Exeter Book, translated by R. K. Gordon, 1926. Public domain.

Where has the horse gone? where the young warrior? where is the giver of treasure?
What has become of the feasting seats? where are the joys of the hall?

The Wanderer

He who is happiest on land does not know how I, careworn and cut off from my kinsmen, have spent a winter on the icy sea.

The Seafarer

Step one: identify the formula. Four questions in a row, each naming something gone, none answered. This is the ubi sunt formula, and it will recur in English poetry for the next thousand years.

Step two: notice the order of the list. Horse, warrior, treasure-giver, feasting seats, joys of the hall. The list moves from an object to a person to a role to a place to an experience, widening as it goes.

Step three: state why the questions are not answered. Because the form's point is that there is no answer. A question asked five times without reply performs absence more effectively than any statement of it, and the reader supplies the silence.

Step four: read "the giver of treasure". Not the king but the function. The Wanderer misses a role in a system rather than a particular man, which tells the reader what exile costs: not companionship but standing.

Step five: turn to The Seafarer's comparison. "He who is happiest on land does not know how I..." The poem defines its speaker against a person who has what he lacks, which is how it makes solitude measurable.

Step six: work the winter image. Winter on the icy sea is a season, a place and a state of mind at once. Old English poetry routinely uses weather for interior conditions without announcing the transfer, so the reader must supply it.

Step seven: address the Christian turn. Both poems end by directing the reader toward the security of heaven, after a hundred lines of earthly loss. The question is whether that consoles or merely relocates the same longing.

Step eight: state the defensible position. The ending does not undo the lament; it renames its object. A reader can argue that the poem finds a lord who cannot be lost, or that the same grief has been given a new address, and both readings must account for the fact that the poem's imaginative energy is in the loss.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. In what manuscript do these poems survive?
    Show the full solution

    The Exeter Book

  2. What does an elegy lament in Old English?
    Show the full solution

    The lost lord and hall

  3. What is the ubi sunt formula?
    Show the full solution

    A series of unanswered "where are they now" questions

  4. What does wyrd mean?
    Show the full solution

    Fate, or what happens

  5. How do both poems end?
    Show the full solution

    By turning toward Christian consolation

  6. Why are the ubi sunt questions left unanswered?
    Show the full solution

    Because the form's point is that there is no answer. A question asked five times without reply performs absence more effectively than any statement of it could, since the reader supplies the silence themselves. Answering even one would convert the lament into information. The silence after each question is the poem's content

  7. Analyze the order of the Wanderer's list.
    Show the full solution

    Horse, warrior, treasure-giver, feasting seats, joys of the hall: object, person, role, place, experience. The list widens as it goes, moving from a thing that could be replaced to a condition that cannot. By the last item the speaker is naming something with no physical existence at all, which is where the loss actually lives. It widens from a replaceable object to an irrecoverable state

  8. Why "the giver of treasure" rather than a name?
    Show the full solution

    Because the speaker misses a function in a system rather than a particular man. The phrase tells the reader what exile actually costs: not companionship but standing, the position of being someone to whom treasure is given. A name would make the poem about grief for a person; the role makes it about the loss of a place in the world. He misses a role in a system, not an individual

  9. How does The Seafarer make solitude measurable?
    Show the full solution

    By defining its speaker against someone who has what he lacks. "He who is happiest on land does not know how I..." sets up a comparison that gives the reader a scale, since solitude described alone has nothing to be measured against. The land-dweller exists in the poem only to make the sea legible. It sets the speaker against a land-dweller who cannot know

  10. State a defensible position on the Christian ending.
    Show the full solution

    That it does not undo the lament but renames its object. A reader can argue the poem finds a lord who cannot be lost, or that the same grief has simply been given a new address. Both readings must account for the fact that the imaginative energy of the poem is in the loss rather than in the consolation, and an essay that notices where the writing is strongest is arguing from evidence. It renames the object of the longing rather than ending it

Lesson 1.6 · Unit 1 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.6

The frame narrative and what it makes possible

Chaucer wrote in English when the prestige languages were French and Latin, and he built his masterpiece on a device that let him include everybody. The frame is not a container for the tales; it is the argument.

The key ideas
  1. Geoffrey Chaucer wrote The Canterbury Tales from about 1387 until his death in 1400, leaving it unfinished.
  2. Middle English is readable with glosses, and this course quotes it directly rather than in translation.
  3. A frame narrative is a story containing other stories, with a device that explains why they are being told.
  4. The pilgrimage is the device, and it is the only occasion in medieval England that could legitimately mix the social classes.
  5. The Host proposes a storytelling contest, which supplies a reason for each teller to compete.
  6. Chaucer writes himself in as a pilgrim, a naive one, which gives him a narrator who reports without judging.
  7. The tales suit the tellers, so a tale is characterization as well as content.
  8. Tellers interrupt and answer each other, which turns the collection into an argument.

Where students lose marks: reading a tale without its teller. A tale in Chaucer is evidence about the person telling it, and separating the two discards half of what is on the page.

Worked example

The text. Geoffrey Chaucer, the General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales, about 1387. Public domain. Middle English with glosses; spelling is as printed.

Whan that Aprille with his shoures soote
The droghte of March hath perced to the roote,
And bathed every veyne in swich licour
Of which vertu engendred is the flour...
Thanne longen folk to goon on pilgrimages

Bifil that in that seson on a day,
In Southwerk at the Tabard as I lay
Redy to wenden on my pilgrymage
To Caunterbury with ful devout corage,
At nyght was come into that hostelrye
Wel nyne and twenty in a compaignye,
Of sondry folk, by aventure y-falle
In felaweshipe, and pilgrimes were they alle

Step one: gloss the opening. Shoures soote, sweet showers; droghte, drought; perced, pierced; swich licour, such liquid; vertu, power; engendred, brought forth. The passage says April's rain has reached the root of March's dryness and made flowers grow.

Step two: read the grammar of the first sentence. It runs eighteen lines before reaching a main clause, and the main clause is "Thanne longen folk to goon on pilgrimages". The whole spring is a subordinate clause explaining why people travel.

Step three: state what that syntax argues. Pilgrimage is placed inside a natural cycle. Religious motive and the return of spring are joined in one sentence, so the poem begins by declining to separate devotion from biology.

Step four: notice the second passage's setting. A tavern in Southwark, outside the city walls. Not a church, not a court, not a hall, but the one kind of place where twenty-nine strangers of different ranks could legitimately share a room.

Step five: state what that permits. A knight, a miller, a prioress, a merchant and a cook can speak in sequence and answer one another. No other medieval occasion would allow it, so the frame is what makes the social range of the poem possible.

Step six: read "by aventure y-falle in felaweshipe". They fell into fellowship by chance. Chaucer insists the mixture is accidental, which is a fiction that lets him assemble exactly the sample of English society he wants.

Step seven: identify the narrator. "As I lay" places Chaucer inside his own poem as one of the pilgrims. This narrator admires almost everyone and notices details that contradict his admiration, which is the technique lesson 1.7 examines.

Step eight: state what the contest adds. The Host proposes that each pilgrim tell tales and that the best win a supper. That converts a collection into a competition, so every tale is aimed at an audience the reader can see, and several are aimed at a specific rival in the company.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When did Chaucer write The Canterbury Tales?
    Show the full solution

    From about 1387 until his death in 1400, unfinished

  2. Define a frame narrative.
    Show the full solution

    A story containing other stories, with a device explaining why they are told

  3. Where does the company assemble?
    Show the full solution

    The Tabard, a tavern in Southwark

  4. How many pilgrims are in the company?
    Show the full solution

    Nine and twenty, plus the narrator and the Host

  5. What does the Host propose?
    Show the full solution

    A storytelling contest, with a supper as the prize

  6. What does the eighteen-line opening sentence argue?
    Show the full solution

    That pilgrimage belongs inside a natural cycle. The whole account of April rain, root, sap and flower is a subordinate clause, and the main clause is that people then long to go on pilgrimages. Religious motive and the return of spring are joined by grammar, so the poem opens by declining to separate devotion from biology. Devotion and the spring are joined in one sentence

  7. Why is the tavern the necessary setting?
    Show the full solution

    Because it is the one kind of place where a knight, a miller, a prioress and a cook could legitimately share a room. A church, a court or a hall would each admit only part of the range. The frame is chosen for what it permits socially, and the poem's entire social breadth depends on that choice. It is the only place that could mix those ranks

  8. What work does "by aventure y-falle in felaweshipe" do?
    Show the full solution

    It insists the mixture happened by chance. That is a useful fiction: it lets Chaucer assemble exactly the cross-section of English society he wants while presenting the assembly as accidental. A reader who notices the claim also notices how carefully selected the twenty-nine actually are. It presents a carefully chosen sample as an accident

  9. Why does Chaucer write himself in as a pilgrim?
    Show the full solution

    It gives him a narrator who reports without judging. The pilgrim Chaucer admires almost everyone and records details that contradict his admiration, so the reader receives accurate observation with unreliable evaluation and must reconcile them. The device is the same one Twain would use five centuries later. To get a narrator who observes accurately and judges badly

  10. What does the contest add to a collection of tales?
    Show the full solution

    An audience and a motive. Each tale is now aimed at listeners the reader can see, and several are aimed at a specific rival in the company, so tales answer and insult each other. The frame converts a collection into an argument, and reading a tale out of that context loses the half of it that is directed at somebody. It makes the tales compete with and answer each other

Lesson 1.7 · Unit 1 · RL.11-12.6, RL.11-12.3

Satire by description, and the teller who indicts himself

Chaucer almost never tells a reader that a pilgrim is corrupt. He describes them warmly, supplies a detail that cannot be reconciled with the warmth, and moves on. The reader does the rest, which is why the portraits have survived six hundred years.

The key ideas
  1. The estates satire is a medieval genre that reviews each social order and finds it failing its duty.
  2. Chaucer's method is the unreconciled detail, placed inside an admiring description.
  3. The narrator's approval is part of the technique, since the reader must notice what he does not.
  4. The Pardoner sells forged relics and admits it in his prologue in front of the company.
  5. His tale condemns avarice, which makes him both a hypocrite and an effective preacher.
  6. The Wife of Bath's prologue is twice the length of her tale, and it argues with scripture.
  7. She quotes authorities against themselves, which is a formal technique rather than a complaint.
  8. The tales answer the prologues, so reading the two together is not optional.

Where students lose marks: summarizing a portrait's conclusion instead of showing the detail that produces it. Quote the line that cannot be reconciled with the praise around it, and explain what it establishes.

Worked example

The texts. Chaucer, the General Prologue and the Pardoner's Prologue, about 1387. Public domain. Middle English with glosses.

A good WIF was ther of biside BATHE,
But she was somdel deef, and that was scathe.
Of clooth-makyng she hadde swich an haunt,
She passed hem of Ypres and of Gaunt.

For I wol preche and begge in sondry landes;
I wol nat do no labour with myne handes,
Ne make baskettes, and lyve therby,
By cause I wol nat beggen ydelly.

The Pardoner

Step one: gloss the first passage. Somdel deef, somewhat deaf; scathe, a pity; haunt, skill; she passed hem, she surpassed those of Ypres and Ghent, the great cloth-making cities of Flanders.

Step two: notice the narrator's tone. "A good WIF", and her deafness is "a pity". The pilgrim Chaucer approves of her and reports her skill admiringly, with no reservation stated anywhere in the portrait.

Step three: find the unreconciled detail. She surpasses the weavers of Ypres and Ghent. That is a large claim about a woman in an English provincial town, and the reader is left to decide whether it is true or whether the narrator is repeating what she told him.

Step four: state the method. Chaucer supplies praise and evidence that strains it, and declines to resolve them. The satire happens in the reader, which is why none of the portraits reads as a lecture.

Step five: turn to the Pardoner's admission. He will preach and beg rather than work, and he will not weave baskets, because he will not beg idly. He states his business model aloud to the company.

Step six: work the logic of the last line. "By cause I wol nat beggen ydelly" means he will not beg without profit. He has taken a phrase that sounds like a principle and used it to describe efficient fraud.

Step seven: state why the confession is the hard part. A concealed hypocrite is a simple target. A hypocrite who announces his method and then preaches so effectively that the tale is genuinely powerful is a much more interesting problem, and Chaucer arranges exactly that.

Step eight: state the reading rule. Take the tale and the teller together. The Pardoner's tale against avarice is excellent preaching delivered by a man who has just explained that he preaches for money, and the question the poem leaves open is whether a true sermon from a false mouth still works.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. What is estates satire?
    Show the full solution

    A medieval genre reviewing each social order and finding it failing its duty

  2. What is Chaucer's main satirical technique?
    Show the full solution

    An unreconciled detail placed inside an admiring description

  3. What does the Pardoner sell?
    Show the full solution

    Forged relics and pardons

  4. What is the Pardoner's tale about?
    Show the full solution

    Avarice, which he condemns

  5. How does the Wife of Bath's prologue compare to her tale?
    Show the full solution

    It is roughly twice as long

  6. Why is the narrator's approval part of the technique?
    Show the full solution

    Because the reader has to notice what he does not. The pilgrim Chaucer calls the Wife good and her deafness a pity, with no reservation anywhere in the portrait, so any judgment in the reader's mind was produced there rather than delivered. A narrator who disapproved would do the work and leave the reader passive. The judgment has to be produced by the reader

  7. Analyze the claim about Ypres and Ghent.
    Show the full solution

    Those were the great cloth-making cities of Flanders, so claiming a woman from near Bath surpassed their weavers is a very large claim. The reader is left to decide whether it is true or whether the narrator is repeating what she told him about herself, and the portrait supplies no way to settle it. The detail strains the praise without contradicting it. It is either remarkable or her own boast repeated credulously

  8. Work the logic of "I wol nat beggen ydelly".
    Show the full solution

    It means he will not beg without profit. The Pardoner has taken a phrase shaped like a principle, refusing idleness, and used it to describe efficient fraud. The joke is grammatical: the sentence has the form of a moral commitment and the content of a business plan. A sentence shaped like a principle describing efficient fraud

  9. Why is the Pardoner's confession the hard part?
    Show the full solution

    A concealed hypocrite is a simple target. The Pardoner announces his method to the company and then preaches so effectively that his tale against avarice is genuinely powerful. Chaucer has arranged a case where the sermon works and the preacher is false, which is a much more interesting problem than exposure would be. He admits the fraud and then preaches effectively

  10. State the reading rule for Chaucer.
    Show the full solution

    Take the tale and the teller together. A tale is evidence about the person telling it, and several are aimed at rivals in the company, so separating the two discards half of what is on the page. The Pardoner's excellent sermon from a mouth he has just declared false is the clearest case, and the poem leaves open whether a true sermon from a false preacher still works. Read tale and teller together, always

Lesson 1.8 · Unit 1 · RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.5

Romance, and a code tested past what it can hold

Sir Gawain and the Green Knight is a chivalric romance that sets up the genre's machinery perfectly and then uses it to catch its hero in a failure so small that the poem cannot decide how serious it is.

The key ideas
  1. The poem survives in one manuscript, Cotton Nero A.x, alongside three other poems by the same unknown author.
  2. It is written in the alliterative line, revived in the fourteenth century in the north and west of England.
  3. Each stanza ends with a bob and wheel, a very short line followed by four rhymed ones.
  4. Chivalric romance puts a knight through a test that proves or disproves a virtue.
  5. The pentangle on Gawain's shield stands for five sets of five virtues, and the poem explains it at length.
  6. The exchange of winnings is the second game, and the hunts are interleaved with the bedroom scenes.
  7. Gawain keeps the green girdle because it is said to preserve life, and conceals it.
  8. The court laughs and adopts the girdle, which is not the response Gawain has.

Where students lose marks: deciding whether Gawain passed or failed. The poem gives three verdicts, from the Green Knight, from Gawain and from the court, and they do not agree. Write about the disagreement.

Worked example

The text. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, late fourteenth century, translated by Jessie L. Weston, 1898. Public domain.

And why the pentangle is his, that noble prince's own, I am minded to tell you, though it tarry my tale. It is a sign that Solomon set ere-while, in betokening of truth; by its title it holdeth, for it is a figure that in it hath five points, and each line overlaps and is linked with another, and everywhere it is endless.

For care of thy knock cowardice taught me to accord me with covetousness, and forsake my true kind, that is the largess and loyalty that belong unto knights.

Gawain

Step one: read what the pentangle claims. Endless, interlocked, each line linked to another. It is a figure in which nothing can be removed without the whole shape ceasing to exist.

Step two: state the consequence the poem sets up. If the virtues are interlocked and endless, then a single failure is not a partial failure. The shield is a promise that Gawain can only be wholly good or wholly undone.

Step three: identify what Gawain actually does. He accepts a green girdle from the lady, believing it will save his life, and does not hand it over in the exchange of winnings. He keeps a gift and breaks a game.

Step four: weigh the failure honestly. He refuses the lady three times, he goes to the appointment he could have avoided, and he flinches once at an axe he expects to kill him. The only actual breach is a concealed belt.

Step five: read Gawain's own verdict. He names cowardice and covetousness and says he forsook his true nature. That is the strictest reading available, and it is the one the pentangle demands.

Step six: read the Green Knight's verdict. He nicks Gawain's neck once and tells him he is the most faultless knight alive, because he acted from love of life rather than from greed. That is a lenient verdict from the injured party.

Step seven: read the court's verdict. Camelot laughs and adopts the green girdle as a badge, which converts Gawain's mark of shame into a fashion. They have not understood what he is telling them, or they have decided not to.

Step eight: state the poem's real subject. Not whether Gawain failed but whether a code that admits no partial failure can be lived in by an actual person. The three verdicts are three answers, and the poem ends without choosing among them.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. In what manuscript does the poem survive?
    Show the full solution

    Cotton Nero A.x, with three other poems by the same author

  2. What is a bob and wheel?
    Show the full solution

    A very short line ending a stanza, followed by four rhymed lines

  3. What does the pentangle stand for?
    Show the full solution

    Five sets of five virtues, endless and interlocked

  4. What does Gawain keep and conceal?
    Show the full solution

    The green girdle, said to preserve his life

  5. How does the court respond at the end?
    Show the full solution

    It laughs and adopts the green girdle as a badge

  6. Why does the pentangle's design matter to the plot?
    Show the full solution

    Because a figure whose lines are endless and interlocked cannot lose one part and remain itself. The shield is a promise that Gawain can only be wholly good or wholly undone, with no partial credit available. That design is what converts a concealed belt into a total failure by the poem's own stated standard. Interlocked virtues make any single failure a total one

  7. Weigh Gawain's failure honestly.
    Show the full solution

    He refuses the lady three times, keeps an appointment he could have avoided at the cost of his life, and flinches once at an axe he expects to kill him. The only actual breach is failing to hand over a belt in a game. Stated plainly, the offense is very small, and the poem's difficulty comes from the gap between its size and its consequences. One concealed belt, after passing every larger test

  8. Compare Gawain's verdict with the Green Knight's.
    Show the full solution

    Gawain names cowardice and covetousness and says he forsook his true nature, which is the strictest reading and the one the pentangle demands. The Green Knight nicks his neck once and calls him the most faultless knight alive, since he acted from love of life rather than greed. The injured party is lenient and the offender is merciless. The offender condemns himself; the victim acquits him

  9. What does the court's laughter accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    It converts a mark of shame into a fashion. Camelot adopts the green girdle as a badge, which either means it has not understood what Gawain is telling it or has decided not to. Either way the poem's last movement shows a society absorbing a moral crisis by turning it into a style, which is a very modern observation. It turns his shame into a fashion

  10. State the poem's real subject.
    Show the full solution

    Not whether Gawain failed but whether a code admitting no partial failure can be lived in by an actual person. Three verdicts are offered, by Gawain, by the Green Knight and by the court, and they do not agree. The poem ends without choosing, so an essay that picks one and ignores the others has removed the difficulty the poem was built around. Whether a code with no partial credit is livable

Unit 1 review · Old and Middle English

Ten questions across the whole unit

Questions 1 to 5 check that you hold the terms. Questions 6 to 10 require you to reason across the eight lessons.

  1. Describe the alliterative line.
    Show the full solution

    Four stresses, two on each side of a caesura, bound by alliteration on the third stress

  2. What is a kenning?
    Show the full solution

    A metaphorical compound, such as whale-road for sea

  3. Define the comitatus and wergild.
    Show the full solution

    The reciprocal bond of lord and retainers; the man-price that settles a killing

  4. What is the ubi sunt formula?
    Show the full solution

    A series of unanswered "where are they now" questions

  5. What does the pentangle on Gawain's shield stand for?
    Show the full solution

    Five sets of five virtues, endless and interlocked

  6. Explain why kennings exist as a technical device.
    Show the full solution

    A poet composing aloud needs several names for one thing, each beginning with a different sound, so the line can be completed whatever the alliteration demands. Sea can be whale-road, swan-path or the gannet's bath as required. The figurative richness is a by-product of an oral technical need. They supply synonyms with different initial sounds

  7. State Beowulf's central question and how the dragon answers it.
    Show the full solution

    Whether a system built on reciprocal obligation can hold against something that does not reciprocate. The dragon wants nothing the code can offer, the retainers flee, the treasure is reburied useless, and a prophecy closes the poem with the Geats destroyed. Everything the code promised is void at the moment it is called in. It cannot, and the ending demonstrates each failure

  8. Why is Grendel's mother the harder interpretive problem?
    Show the full solution

    Because she acts on the society's own principle. She kills one man in payment for a son, which is feud logic, and the poem calls her raid less terrible than Grendel's precisely because it follows a rule. The poem concedes that its monster reasons as the Danes reason, making the boundary a matter of definition rather than nature. She follows the same feud logic as the humans

  9. What does Chaucer's frame make possible that no other device would?
    Show the full solution

    A pilgrimage assembling at a Southwark tavern is the one occasion in medieval England where a knight, a miller, a prioress and a cook could legitimately share a room and speak in sequence. The Host's contest then makes the tales compete and answer each other, so the collection becomes an argument rather than an anthology. A legitimate mixing of ranks, and tales that answer each other

  10. Why does Sir Gawain end without a verdict?
    Show the full solution

    Because three verdicts are offered and they disagree. Gawain names cowardice and covetousness, the Green Knight calls him the most faultless knight alive, and the court laughs and adopts the girdle as a fashion. The poem's real subject is whether a code admitting no partial failure can be lived in by an actual person, and it declines to settle that. Three verdicts disagree, and the poem refuses to choose

Lesson 2.1 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.4

The Petrarchan form, and what the turn is for

The sonnet is the most durable form in English and the easiest to analyze badly. Its whole architecture exists to set up one moment, the turn, and a reader who can locate the turn can analyze any sonnet ever written.

The key ideas
  1. A sonnet is fourteen lines, in English almost always iambic pentameter.
  2. The Petrarchan or Italian sonnet divides into an octave of eight lines and a sestet of six.
  3. Its rhyme scheme is ABBAABBA for the octave, then CDECDE or CDCDCD for the sestet.
  4. The volta, or turn, falls at line nine, where the sestet answers the octave.
  5. The octave states a problem and the sestet resolves, qualifies or reverses it.
  6. Petrarch's sequence to Laura supplied the conventions: an unattainable beloved, the lover's suffering, and the blazon.
  7. Wyatt and Surrey brought the form into English in the 1530s and 1540s, published in Tottel's Miscellany, 1557.
  8. The form's limited rhymes are its difficulty, since Italian rhymes easily and English does not.

Where students lose marks: naming the rhyme scheme and stopping. The rhyme scheme matters because it creates the division, and the division exists to house the turn. Say what the turn does.

Worked example

The text. Sir Thomas Wyatt, "Whoso list to hunt", written in the 1530s, printed 1557. Public domain. Spelling as modernized in early printings.

Whoso list to hunt, I know where is an hind,
But as for me, alas, I may no more.
The vain travail hath wearied me so sore,
I am of them that farthest cometh behind.
Yet may I by no means my wearied mind
Draw from the deer, but as she fleeth afore
Fainting I follow. I leave off therefore,
Sithens in a net I seek to hold the wind.

Who list her hunt, I put him out of doubt,
As well as I may spend his time in vain.
And graven with diamonds in letters plain
There is written, her fair neck round about:
Noli me tangere, for Caesar's I am,
And wild for to hold, though I seem tame.

Step one: mark the division. Eight lines, then six. The octave ends at "hold the wind" and the sestet begins "Who list her hunt". The break is audible before any content is considered.

Step two: state the octave's problem. The speaker is pursuing a deer he cannot catch, is exhausted, and cannot stop. Three claims in eight lines: the chase is hopeless, he is losing, and he continues anyway.

Step three: locate the turn. Line nine addresses other hunters instead of the deer. The speaker stops describing his own condition and starts warning somebody else, which is a change of addressee as well as of subject.

Step four: read what the sestet supplies. A reason. The deer wears a collar reading "Noli me tangere, for Caesar's I am", meaning touch me not, I belong to Caesar. The octave's mystery is answered by an inscription.

Step five: work the allegory carefully. Wyatt was at Henry VIII's court and Anne Boleyn was widely thought to be the subject. Caesar is the king. The poem cannot say so and does not have to, since a collar with an owner's name on it says everything.

Step six: analyze "in a net I seek to hold the wind". A net catches what has substance and lets air through, so the image states an impossibility in terms of the tool. It is also the octave's most beautiful line, placed immediately before the turn.

Step seven: read the last line. "Wild for to hold, though I seem tame." The deer speaks, and what she says undercuts the ownership just asserted. Caesar's claim is stated and then qualified within two lines.

Step eight: state the analytical method. Find the break, state what the octave proposes, state what the sestet does to it, and name the relation: answer, qualification, reversal or refusal. Every sonnet in this unit yields to that sequence.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. How is a Petrarchan sonnet divided?
    Show the full solution

    An octave of eight lines and a sestet of six

  2. Where does the volta fall?
    Show the full solution

    At line nine

  3. Give the octave's rhyme scheme.
    Show the full solution

    ABBAABBA

  4. Who brought the sonnet into English, and where was it printed?
    Show the full solution

    Wyatt and Surrey; Tottel's Miscellany, 1557

  5. What is written on the deer's collar?
    Show the full solution

    "Noli me tangere, for Caesar's I am"

  6. What does the turn change in this poem?
    Show the full solution

    The addressee as well as the subject. The octave describes the speaker's own exhaustion; line nine turns to warn other hunters. A reader tracking only content would call it a change of topic, but the more precise observation is that the poem stops speaking about itself and starts speaking to someone else. Both the subject and who is being addressed

  7. What does the sestet supply that the octave lacked?
    Show the full solution

    A reason. Eight lines describe a hopeless pursuit without explaining why it is hopeless, and the sestet answers with an inscription: the deer belongs to Caesar. The structure withholds the cause until the turn, so the octave's exhaustion is experienced before it is explained. The reason the pursuit was always hopeless

  8. Explain the allegory without overstating it.
    Show the full solution

    Wyatt was at Henry VIII's court and Anne Boleyn was widely believed to be the subject, with Caesar standing for the king. The poem never says so, and does not need to: a collar bearing an owner's name conveys the situation completely. Stating the identification as probable rather than certain is the accurate way to write about it. Caesar is the king; the identification is probable, not stated

  9. Analyze "in a net I seek to hold the wind".
    Show the full solution

    A net catches what has substance and lets air pass, so the image states an impossibility in terms of the tool rather than the goal. It is also the octave's most beautiful line and sits immediately before the turn, so the poem's finest writing marks the moment the speaker gives up. The tool is defined by letting the target through

  10. What does the last line do to the sestet's claim?
    Show the full solution

    It qualifies it. "Wild for to hold, though I seem tame" lets the deer speak, and what she says undercuts the ownership asserted two lines earlier. Caesar's claim is stated and immediately complicated, so the poem's final position is that possession is asserted rather than achieved. It undercuts Caesar's ownership from the deer's own mouth

Lesson 2.2 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.4

Shakespeare rearranges the argument

The English sonnet keeps the fourteen lines and redistributes them, and the redistribution changes what the form can do. Three quatrains and a couplet is a different machine from an octave and a sestet.

The key ideas
  1. The English or Shakespearean sonnet is three quatrains and a closing couplet.
  2. Its rhyme scheme is ABAB CDCD EFEF GG, which needs only two rhyming words per sound.
  3. That change suits English, which has fewer rhymes available than Italian.
  4. The quatrains usually give three versions of one idea, each more extreme than the last.
  5. The turn may fall at line nine or at line thirteen, and sometimes at both.
  6. The couplet is the form's danger, because two rhymed lines can sound conclusive without being earned.
  7. Shakespeare's 154 sonnets appeared in 1609, probably without his consent.
  8. The sequence has a narrative shape, addressed largely to a young man and then to a dark lady.

Where students lose marks: quoting the couplet as the poem's meaning. Ask whether the couplet actually answers the quatrains or merely sounds like it does, because Shakespeare exploits the difference deliberately.

Worked example

The text. William Shakespeare, Sonnet 73, published 1609. Public domain.

That time of year thou mayst in me behold
When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang
Upon those boughs which shake against the cold,
Bare ruin'd choirs, where late the sweet birds sang.

In me thou see'st the twilight of such day
As after sunset fadeth in the west,
Which by and by black night doth take away,
Death's second self, that seals up all in rest.

In me thou see'st the glowing of such fire
That on the ashes of his youth doth lie,
As the death-bed whereon it must expire,
Consum'd with that which it was nourish'd by.

This thou perceiv'st, which makes thy love more strong,
To love that well which thou must leave ere long.

Step one: identify the three images. A season, a day, a fire. Each quatrain takes one and applies it to the speaker's age.

Step two: measure the time each covers. Autumn is months, twilight is minutes, a dying fire is moments. The three quatrains accelerate, so the poem gets shorter as it goes even though the stanzas do not.

Step three: state what that acceleration argues. Approaching death feels faster the nearer it comes. The structure delivers that claim without stating it, and it is the poem's most sophisticated move.

Step four: read "Bare ruin'd choirs". The branches are compared to the roofless choirs of monasteries dissolved under Henry VIII, ruins visible across England when the poem was written. Birdsong becomes a vanished liturgy.

Step five: work the third quatrain's paradox. "Consum'd with that which it was nourish'd by." The wood that fed the fire becomes the ash that smothers it, so the thing that sustained the life is the thing that ends it.

Step six: notice the anaphora. "In me thou see'st", twice, and "That time of year thou mayst in me behold". Each quatrain starts by directing the beloved's attention, so the poem is staged as something being shown rather than confessed.

Step seven: test the couplet. "This thou perceiv'st, which makes thy love more strong, / To love that well which thou must leave ere long." It claims that the decline strengthens the beloved's love. Nothing in the quatrains established that, and the couplet asserts it in two lines.

Step eight: state the finding. The couplet is an argument the poem has not made, delivered with the confidence of a conclusion, and the poem is more moving for it. A man cataloguing his own decay ends by telling the person he loves that it should make them love him more, which is the least secure claim in the sonnet.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. How is an English sonnet divided?
    Show the full solution

    Three quatrains and a couplet

  2. Give its rhyme scheme.
    Show the full solution

    ABAB CDCD EFEF GG

  3. Why does that scheme suit English?
    Show the full solution

    English has fewer rhymes available, and this needs only two per sound

  4. When were Shakespeare's sonnets published?
    Show the full solution

    1609, probably without his consent

  5. Name the three images of Sonnet 73 in order.
    Show the full solution

    A season, a day, a fire

  6. What does the sequence of images accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    It accelerates. Autumn covers months, twilight covers minutes, a dying fire covers moments, so the poem gets faster as it proceeds even though the stanzas stay the same length. The structure delivers the claim that approaching death feels quicker the nearer it comes, without ever stating it. Months, then minutes, then moments: the poem accelerates

  7. Analyze "Bare ruin'd choirs".
    Show the full solution

    The branches are compared to the roofless choirs of monasteries dissolved under Henry VIII, ruins standing across England when the poem was written. Birdsong becomes a vanished liturgy, which adds a historical loss to a personal one and gives the speaker's aging a national scale for three words. Dissolved monasteries make birdsong a vanished liturgy

  8. Work the paradox of the third quatrain.
    Show the full solution

    "Consum'd with that which it was nourish'd by": the wood that fed the fire becomes the ash that smothers it. What sustained the life is what ends it, which is a description of living rather than of dying. The paradox is the harshest thing in the poem and it arrives in the quietest line. What sustains the fire is what puts it out

  9. What does the anaphora stage?
    Show the full solution

    "In me thou see'st", repeated, presents the poem as something being shown rather than confessed. Each quatrain begins by directing the beloved's attention to the speaker, so the reader watches a demonstration conducted for a second person who is present throughout. That staging is what makes the couplet's claim on that person possible. A demonstration performed for a listener who is present

  10. Test whether the couplet earns its conclusion.
    Show the full solution

    It does not. The quatrains establish decline and nothing else, and the couplet asserts that perceiving the decline strengthens the beloved's love. That is an argument the poem has not made, delivered with a conclusion's confidence, and the sonnet is more moving because of it: a man cataloguing his own decay ends by telling the person he loves that it should make them love him more. No: it asserts what the quatrains never established

Lesson 2.3 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.9

The sequence as a long poem

A sonnet sequence is not an anthology. The poems are ordered, they refer to each other, and the sequence tells a story the individual sonnets cannot, which is why reading one in isolation misses what the form was invented to do.

The key ideas
  1. Sir Philip Sidney's Astrophil and Stella, written about 1582 and printed 1591, began the English vogue.
  2. Edmund Spenser's Amoretti, 1595, is unusual because it ends in marriage rather than in frustration.
  3. The Spenserian sonnet links the quatrains, rhyming ABAB BCBC CDCD EE so each stanza hands a rhyme to the next.
  4. A blazon catalogs the beloved's features, usually in descending order with metaphorical comparisons.
  5. The sequences argue with the convention they are written in.
  6. Astrophil means star-lover and Stella means star, so the names build the situation into the title.
  7. Shakespeare's Sonnet 130 is an anti-blazon, and it is answering a convention rather than a woman.
  8. Reading order matters, because a sequence's poems comment on their neighbors.

Where students lose marks: treating these poems as sincere biography. They are performances inside a highly rule-bound convention, and the interest is usually in where a poet breaks the rule.

Worked example

The texts. Sir Philip Sidney, Astrophil and Stella, sonnet 1, 1591; Edmund Spenser, Amoretti, sonnet 75, 1595. Both public domain.

Loving in truth, and fain in verse my love to show,
That she, dear she, might take some pleasure of my pain...
Biting my truant pen, beating myself for spite,
"Fool," said my Muse to me, "look in thy heart, and write."

Sidney

One day I wrote her name upon the strand,
But came the waves and washed it away:
Again I wrote it with a second hand,
But came the tide, and made my pains his prey.
"Vain man," said she, "that dost in vain assay
A mortal thing so to immortalize."

Spenser

Step one: read what Sidney's sonnet is about. Not Stella but the difficulty of writing about Stella. The first poem in the sequence is about failing to write the sequence.

Step two: state what the last line does. "Look in thy heart, and write" rejects imitation in favor of sincerity, and it arrives after thirteen lines of laboriously conventional verse. The poem performs the problem before stating the solution.

Step three: notice the paradox. A command to abandon convention is delivered in a perfect Petrarchan sonnet with an alexandrine line and a classical Muse. The sincerity is itself a convention, and Sidney is sophisticated enough to know it.

Step four: turn to Spenser's scene. A man writes a name on a beach, the sea erases it, he writes it again, the tide takes it again. Two attempts and two failures in four lines.

Step five: read who speaks next. She does. Spenser's beloved answers him, which is unusual: the Petrarchan lady is normally silent, and a large part of the convention depends on her silence.

Step six: state what her speech changes. She calls him vain and says a mortal thing cannot be immortalized. The sonnet now contains an argument between two people rather than a lament by one, and she has the stronger position.

Step seven: state how the sonnet answers her. The sestet claims the verse will make her name live, which is the standard poet's boast. What makes it work here is that it has been made to defeat an objection the poem itself raised.

Step eight: state the reading rule. In a sequence, find where the poet breaks the convention. Sidney's whole subject is the convention; Spenser lets the woman speak; Shakespeare's Sonnet 130 refuses the blazon. The break is where the poem is thinking.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Name the two sequences and their dates.
    Show the full solution

    Sidney's Astrophil and Stella, 1591; Spenser's Amoretti, 1595

  2. Give the Spenserian rhyme scheme.
    Show the full solution

    ABAB BCBC CDCD EE

  3. What is a blazon?
    Show the full solution

    A catalog of the beloved's features with metaphorical comparisons

  4. What do the names Astrophil and Stella mean?
    Show the full solution

    Star-lover and star

  5. How does Amoretti differ from most sequences in its ending?
    Show the full solution

    It ends in marriage rather than frustration

  6. What is Sidney's first sonnet actually about?
    Show the full solution

    The difficulty of writing about Stella rather than Stella herself. The opening poem of the sequence is about failing to write the sequence, which places the convention itself at the center before any love poem has been attempted. That is an unusually self-aware way to begin. The difficulty of writing the poems that follow

  7. Identify the paradox in "look in thy heart, and write".
    Show the full solution

    A command to abandon convention in favor of sincerity is delivered inside a perfect Petrarchan sonnet, in long alexandrine lines, and is spoken by a classical Muse. The sincerity is itself conventional, and Sidney is sophisticated enough to know it, which is why the line is a joke as well as a manifesto. Convention is rejected by a thoroughly conventional poem

  8. What does the Spenserian rhyme linkage do?
    Show the full solution

    Each quatrain hands a rhyme to the next, so the stanzas interlock rather than sitting side by side. The sonnet becomes continuous instead of segmented, which suits a sequence whose poems also connect to one another, and it makes the English sonnet's three separate versions of an idea harder to write. It interlocks the quatrains into one continuous poem

  9. Why does it matter that Spenser's beloved speaks?
    Show the full solution

    Because the Petrarchan lady is normally silent, and much of the convention depends on that silence: an unanswering beloved cannot contradict the lover's account. Spenser's woman calls him vain and states that a mortal thing cannot be immortalized, so the sonnet contains an argument between two people, and she has the stronger position. It turns a lament into an argument she is winning

  10. State the reading rule for sequences.
    Show the full solution

    Find where the poet breaks the convention. Sidney makes the convention his subject, Spenser lets the woman answer, and Shakespeare's Sonnet 130 refuses the blazon outright. The break is where the poem is thinking, and an essay that identifies the rule before identifying the departure has the whole analysis available. Locate the break in the convention

Lesson 2.4 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.3

Blank verse and the hero who wants too much

Before Marlowe, English drama was mostly rhymed and mostly moral. He gave the stage a line that sounded like elevated speech rather than like verse, and a protagonist whose appetite the play cannot quite condemn.

The key ideas
  1. Blank verse is unrhymed iambic pentameter, and it became the standard line of English drama.
  2. Christopher Marlowe made it flexible, and Ben Jonson called it his mighty line.
  3. Doctor Faustus was written about 1592 and printed in two differing versions, 1604 and 1616.
  4. The play uses the morality play's structure, with Good and Bad Angels, and a soul at stake.
  5. Faustus sells his soul for twenty-four years of knowledge and power.
  6. He wastes them, on tricks, conjuring and spectacle, which is the play's sharpest judgment.
  7. Mephistopheles tells the truth throughout, including about hell, and Faustus does not listen.
  8. The final soliloquy is a single hour of stage time counted down in verse.

Where students lose marks: writing that Faustus is punished for ambition. The play is much stranger: he is damned, and what the text dwells on is how little he did with what he bought.

Worked example

The text. Christopher Marlowe, Doctor Faustus, about 1592, printed 1604. Public domain.

Why this is hell, nor am I out of it.
Think'st thou that I, who saw the face of God,
And tasted the eternal joys of heaven,
Am not tormented with ten thousand hells
In being depriv'd of everlasting bliss?

Mephistopheles

Ah, Faustus,
Now hast thou but one bare hour to live,
And then thou must be damn'd perpetually!
Stand still, you ever-moving spheres of heaven,
That time may cease, and midnight never come.

Step one: hear the line. "Why this is hell, nor am I out of it" is ten syllables, unrhymed, and reads as speech. Blank verse can carry an ordinary sentence and a grand one in the same meter, which is why the stage adopted it.

Step two: state what Mephistopheles defines. Hell as a condition rather than a place. He is standing on stage in the middle of it, which discards the medieval geography the play's own structure invokes.

Step three: notice who delivers the play's theology. The devil. The most accurate and the most moving account of damnation in the play comes from the character sent to procure it, and he does not lie.

Step four: state what that does to Faustus. He is warned, truthfully, by an eyewitness, and proceeds. His damnation cannot be blamed on deception, which removes the easiest available account of the play.

Step five: read the countdown. "One bare hour to live" is spoken in an hour the audience is also living through. The play converts its own running time into the character's remaining life.

Step six: work the command to the spheres. "Stand still, you ever-moving spheres of heaven." He orders the cosmos to stop, which is exactly the kind of power he contracted for and exactly the kind he never obtained.

Step seven: state what he actually did with the years. Conjured grapes, played tricks on a pope, produced a vision of Helen. Twenty-four years of unlimited power spent on party pieces, and the play shows every one of them.

Step eight: state the play's judgment. Not that ambition is punished but that the ambition was never real. Faustus wanted everything in his opening speech and bought entertainment, and the tragedy is the distance between the two.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Define blank verse.
    Show the full solution

    Unrhymed iambic pentameter

  2. What did Ben Jonson call Marlowe's verse?
    Show the full solution

    His mighty line

  3. How long is Faustus's bargain?
    Show the full solution

    Twenty-four years

  4. What older form does the play borrow from?
    Show the full solution

    The morality play, with Good and Bad Angels

  5. How does Mephistopheles define hell?
    Show the full solution

    As deprivation of God, a condition rather than a place

  6. Why did the stage adopt blank verse?
    Show the full solution

    Because it can carry an ordinary sentence and a grand one in the same meter. "Why this is hell, nor am I out of it" is plain speech in ten syllables, and the same line length holds Faustus's cosmic commands. Rhyme marks every line as verse; blank verse lets a character sound like a person who happens to speak beautifully. It sounds like speech while remaining verse

  7. What is strange about who delivers the play's theology?
    Show the full solution

    The devil does. The most accurate and most moving account of damnation comes from the character sent to procure Faustus's soul, and Mephistopheles does not lie at any point. The play's clearest moral statement is placed in the mouth of its tempter. The tempter gives the truest account, and never lies

  8. What does the honesty of the warnings remove?
    Show the full solution

    The easiest account of the play. Faustus is warned truthfully by an eyewitness to heaven and proceeds anyway, so his damnation cannot be blamed on deception or on a trick in the contract. Whatever explanation an essay offers has to account for a man who was told the truth and did not attend to it. Any reading that blames deception

  9. How does the final scene use time?
    Show the full solution

    It converts the play's running time into the character's remaining life. "One bare hour to live" is spoken in an hour the audience is also living through, and the clock strikes on stage as it strikes in the fiction. Faustus then orders the spheres to stop moving, commanding exactly the power he contracted for and never obtained. Stage time and the character's last hour are the same hour

  10. State the play's actual judgment on Faustus.
    Show the full solution

    Not that ambition is punished but that the ambition was never real. His opening speech wants everything and what he buys is entertainment: conjured grapes, tricks on a pope, a vision of Helen. The play shows every wasted year, and the tragedy is the distance between what he asked for and what he did with it. He wanted everything and spent it on party tricks

Lesson 2.5 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.3, RL.11-12.5

The soliloquy as thinking made audible

A soliloquy is not a speech to the audience and it is not a confession. It is a character thinking, in real time, with the mind changing as the verse moves, and Shakespeare's innovation was to let the thought actually go somewhere.

The key ideas
  1. A soliloquy is a speech made alone, in which a character's thought is made audible.
  2. An aside is different, being a brief remark unheard by other characters on stage.
  3. Earlier soliloquies announced a fixed position; Shakespeare's discover one while speaking.
  4. Hamlet was written about 1600, and it is the longest of the plays.
  5. Hamlet has seven soliloquies, and they can be read as a sequence.
  6. The verse registers the thinking, through broken lines, questions and self-interruption.
  7. The most famous speech never mentions Claudius, the ghost or revenge.
  8. Ophelia is on stage during it, in most stagings, which the text permits and which changes everything about the scene.

Where students lose marks: treating "To be or not to be" as Hamlet contemplating suicide and nothing else. Track the grammar: the speech moves from a general question to a general answer without once touching his own situation.

Worked example

The text. William Shakespeare, Hamlet, act 3 scene 1, about 1600. Public domain.

To be, or not to be, that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles
And by opposing end them.

...But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscovered country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will,
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?

Step one: notice the grammar of the opening. An infinitive, then its negation, then a noun. No first person pronoun appears in the speech at any point. Hamlet is not saying "shall I die" but posing a question about anyone.

Step two: state what that changes. The speech is philosophical rather than personal, which is why it can be quoted by people in no distress at all. Whether that abstraction is Hamlet's way of avoiding his own case is a genuine question the play leaves open.

Step three: work the mixed metaphor. "Take arms against a sea of troubles." You cannot fight a sea. The image is usually called a fault and it is better read as accurate: the resistance he is imagining is futile, and the metaphor says so.

Step four: find the turn. "But that the dread of something after death." The speech has been weighing two options and now introduces a third consideration that settles it, which is the structure of a syllogism arriving at an unwelcome conclusion.

Step five: read "the undiscovered country". Death as unexplored territory, and the traveler who does not return. Hamlet has spoken to a ghost in act one, so the line is either forgetting that or refusing to count it.

Step six: state what the speech concludes. That fear of the unknown makes everyone endure what they have. Not a decision but a diagnosis, offered in the first person plural, of a condition Hamlet includes himself in.

Step seven: place the speech in the scene. Claudius and Polonius are hidden and Ophelia has been positioned as bait. A speech about whether anyone acts is delivered inside a trap, and Hamlet may or may not know it.

Step eight: state what the soliloquy does as a form. It lets an audience watch a mind work rather than hear a position announced. The evidence is in the syntax: the questions, the extended qualification, the "but" that redirects the whole argument in the middle of a line.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Define a soliloquy and distinguish it from an aside.
    Show the full solution

    A speech made alone, revealing thought; an aside is a brief remark unheard by others on stage

  2. When was Hamlet written?
    Show the full solution

    About 1600

  3. How many soliloquies does Hamlet have?
    Show the full solution

    Seven

  4. What does Hamlet call death?
    Show the full solution

    The undiscovered country from whose bourn no traveller returns

  5. Who is hidden during the speech?
    Show the full solution

    Claudius and Polonius, with Ophelia positioned as bait

  6. What does the absence of the first person singular establish?
    Show the full solution

    That the speech is philosophical rather than personal. Hamlet uses infinitives and the first person plural and never says "I", so he is posing a question about anyone rather than announcing a decision about himself. Whether that abstraction is his way of avoiding his own case is a genuine question the play leaves open. The question is about anyone, not about himself

  7. Defend "take arms against a sea of troubles".
    Show the full solution

    It is usually called a mixed metaphor and a fault. It is better read as accurate: you cannot fight a sea, and the resistance Hamlet is imagining is futile. The image conveys the hopelessness of the option in the act of proposing it, which is more precise than a coherent metaphor would have been. The impossibility of the image is the point

  8. Where is the turn, and what does it do?
    Show the full solution

    At "But that the dread of something after death". Two options have been weighed and a third consideration arrives that settles the matter, which is the structure of a syllogism reaching an unwelcome conclusion. The "but" redirects the entire argument in the middle of a line, and the verse registers the swerve. A third consideration arrives and decides the question

  9. What is odd about "no traveller returns"?
    Show the full solution

    Hamlet spoke to his father's ghost in act one. The line either forgets that or refuses to count it, and both readings are productive: a man who has met a returning traveler and says none return is either not thinking about his own life or has decided the ghost proved nothing. The play does not resolve it. He has met a ghost, and the line does not count it

  10. What does the soliloquy achieve as a dramatic form?
    Show the full solution

    It lets an audience watch a mind work rather than hear a position announced. The evidence is syntactic: the questions, the long qualification, the conjunction that redirects the argument mid-line. Earlier drama gave characters fixed positions to declare; Shakespeare gives them thought that arrives at somewhere they did not start. Thinking happens in front of the audience, in the syntax

Lesson 2.6 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.3, RL.11-12.2

Delay, and the problem of knowing

The question every reader of Hamlet arrives at is why he does not act. The most useful answer is not psychological but epistemological: he is asked to kill a king on the word of a ghost, and the play is about what would count as sufficient evidence.

The key ideas
  1. Revenge tragedy was a popular genre, with rules Shakespeare's audience knew well.
  2. Its conventions include a ghost, a delay, feigned madness, a play within the play and a bloodbath, and Hamlet has all of them.
  3. The ghost's status is genuinely uncertain, since a spirit might be a devil in a shape that is pleasing.
  4. The Mousetrap is an experiment, designed to obtain evidence Hamlet can act on.
  5. Claudius's prayer scene gives Hamlet an opportunity he refuses on theological grounds.
  6. The prayer fails, as Claudius says in a line Hamlet does not hear.
  7. Hamlet kills Polonius without hesitation, which shows the delay is not general irresolution.
  8. He acts decisively at sea, sending Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to their deaths.

Where students lose marks: explaining the delay by Hamlet's temperament. He kills Polonius through a curtain in under a second and rewrites a commission at sea, so whatever the delay is, it is specific to Claudius.

Worked example

The text. Shakespeare, Hamlet, acts 2 and 3, about 1600. Public domain.

The spirit that I have seen
May be the devil, and the devil hath power
T' assume a pleasing shape... I'll have grounds
More relative than this. The play's the thing
Wherein I'll catch the conscience of the King.

My words fly up, my thoughts remain below:
Words without thoughts never to heaven go.

Claudius

Step one: read the first passage as a statement of method. The ghost may be a devil, so its testimony is not sufficient. Hamlet wants "grounds more relative", meaning evidence more directly connected to the claim.

Step two: state what that makes the Mousetrap. An experiment with a hypothesis and an observable outcome. Hamlet stages a murder resembling the alleged one and arranges for Horatio to watch Claudius independently, which is a controlled observation.

Step three: state why the delay is rational. He is being asked to kill an anointed king on supernatural testimony from a source that might be damning him. A man who acted immediately on that would be reckless rather than heroic.

Step four: turn to the prayer scene. Claudius is alone and defenseless. Hamlet draws, then reasons that killing a man at prayer sends him to heaven, which would be reward rather than revenge, and he sheathes the sword.

Step five: read Claudius's couplet. The prayer has failed, because he will not give up the crown or the queen. Hamlet leaves the stage a moment before the audience learns that his one condition was satisfied.

Step six: state what that structure does. The audience is given information the character lacks, so the scene's irony is dramatic rather than verbal, and the play's most tightly reasoned decision is shown to be wrong by two lines spoken after the reasoner has left.

Step seven: test the delay against his other actions. He stabs through a curtain within a second of hearing a noise, and he rewrites a commission at sea so that two former friends are executed without shrift. The man is capable of instant and ruthless action.

Step eight: state the defensible conclusion. The delay is not a character trait but a problem about evidence and about the particular act. Hamlet acts instantly when he does not have to be certain, and slowly when certainty is what the act requires, which is a coherent position rather than a flaw.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Name four conventions of revenge tragedy.
    Show the full solution

    A ghost, a delay, feigned madness, a play within the play, a final bloodbath

  2. Why does Hamlet doubt the ghost?
    Show the full solution

    Because the devil has power to assume a pleasing shape

  3. What is the Mousetrap for?
    Show the full solution

    To obtain grounds more relative than the ghost's word

  4. Why does Hamlet spare Claudius at prayer?
    Show the full solution

    Because killing him at prayer would send him to heaven

  5. What does Claudius say after Hamlet leaves?
    Show the full solution

    That his words fly up but his thoughts remain below

  6. Why is the Mousetrap an experiment rather than a trick?
    Show the full solution

    It has a hypothesis, a manipulation and an observable outcome, and Hamlet arranges for Horatio to watch Claudius independently so the observation is not his alone. He stages a murder resembling the alleged one and predicts a reaction. That is a controlled test, which is why the delay preceding it is method rather than hesitation. It has a hypothesis, a test and an independent observer

  7. Explain why the delay is rational.
    Show the full solution

    He is asked to kill an anointed king on supernatural testimony from a source that may be a devil working to damn him. Acting immediately on that evidence would be reckless rather than heroic, and the play makes the epistemological problem explicit in Hamlet's own words. The question is what would count as sufficient proof. The evidence is a ghost that might be a devil

  8. What does the prayer scene's structure achieve?
    Show the full solution

    It gives the audience information the character lacks. Hamlet reasons carefully that a man dying at prayer goes to heaven, sheathes his sword and leaves, and two lines later Claudius says the prayer failed. The play's most tightly reasoned decision is shown to be wrong by a speech the reasoner is not present for. His best reasoning is refuted after he has left

  9. How do Hamlet's other actions test the delay theory?
    Show the full solution

    He stabs through a curtain within a second of hearing a noise, killing Polonius, and at sea he rewrites a commission so two former friends are executed without shrift. Whatever the delay is, it is not general irresolution: the man is capable of instant and ruthless action when he is not required to be certain. He acts instantly elsewhere, and ruthlessly

  10. State the defensible conclusion about the delay.
    Show the full solution

    It is a problem about evidence and about this particular act rather than a character trait. Hamlet acts instantly where certainty is not required and slowly where the act demands it, which is coherent rather than flawed. An essay taking that line can account for Polonius, for the voyage and for the prayer scene together, which a temperament explanation cannot. It is specific to an act that requires certainty

Lesson 2.7 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.2

Imagery as argument

Macbeth is the shortest tragedy and the most tightly imagined. A handful of image patterns run through it from first scene to last, and tracing one of them is the most productive analytical exercise the play offers.

The key ideas
  1. Macbeth was written about 1606, shortly after the Gunpowder Plot.
  2. An image pattern is a set of related images recurring across a whole work and accumulating meaning.
  3. The main patterns are blood, clothing, sleep, darkness and children, and each carries an argument.
  4. Clothing images present kingship as a garment that may not fit the wearer.
  5. Blood moves from honor to guilt, so the same substance changes meaning across the play.
  6. Sleep is what Macbeth murders, and the play says so explicitly.
  7. Equivocation is the play's governing idea, connected to the trial of Henry Garnet in 1606.
  8. The witches tell the truth in a form that misleads, which is what equivocation means.

Where students lose marks: listing images without tracking change. An image pattern is an argument because the meaning shifts: show where blood means valor, where it means guilt, and what happens in between.

Worked example

The text. Shakespeare, Macbeth, about 1606. Public domain.

Why do you dress me in borrow'd robes?

Will all great Neptune's ocean wash this blood
Clean from my hand? No, this my hand will rather
The multitudinous seas incarnadine,
Making the green one red.

now does he feel his title
Hang loose about him, like a giant's robe
Upon a dwarfish thief.

Angus, act 5

Step one: place the first quotation. Act 1, when Macbeth is told he is Thane of Cawdor. He names the new title a borrowed robe before he has done anything wrong, which installs the pattern at the start.

Step two: state what a borrowed robe implies. That it belongs to someone else and must be returned. Macbeth's first response to advancement is a metaphor of temporary possession, spoken by a man who does not yet know he will steal a crown.

Step three: follow the pattern to act 5. "Like a giant's robe upon a dwarfish thief." The garment is now too large and the wearer is named a thief. The image has been developed across five acts into a verdict.

Step four: state what the development argues. That kingship is a role with a shape, and a man who takes it by murder does not grow into it. The pattern makes the argument without any character stating it.

Step five: work the blood passage. Neptune's ocean cannot wash the hand clean; instead the hand will turn the seas red. The quantity is reversed, so one man's guilt is larger than an ocean.

Step six: read "incarnadine" and "making the green one red". A Latinate polysyllable followed by five monosyllables of plain English. The second line says the same thing in the plainest possible words, which is what a man does when the grand statement has not relieved him.

Step seven: trace blood across the play. In act 1 the captain's report makes blood a mark of valor, Macbeth having "unseam'd" a rebel. By act 2 it will not wash off, by act 3 it walks as Banquo, and by act 5 it is on Lady Macbeth's sleepwalking hands. The same substance travels from honor to guilt to madness.

Step eight: state the method. Choose one pattern, find its first appearance, find its last, and describe what changed. That structure produces a whole essay and it is available in every Shakespeare play, though it is clearest here.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Macbeth written?
    Show the full solution

    About 1606, shortly after the Gunpowder Plot

  2. Name five of the play's image patterns.
    Show the full solution

    Blood, clothing, sleep, darkness, children

  3. What does equivocation mean?
    Show the full solution

    Telling the truth in a form that misleads

  4. What does Macbeth say he has murdered?
    Show the full solution

    Sleep

  5. How does Angus describe Macbeth's title in act 5?
    Show the full solution

    As a giant's robe on a dwarfish thief

  6. What does the clothing pattern argue across the play?
    Show the full solution

    That kingship is a role with a shape and a man who takes it by murder does not grow into it. Macbeth calls a new title borrowed robes in act 1, before he has done anything wrong, and by act 5 the garment is a giant's robe on a dwarfish thief. The pattern delivers a verdict that no character ever states as a proposition. The role has a shape the usurper never fills

  7. Analyze the reversal in the Neptune passage.
    Show the full solution

    An ocean cannot wash the hand clean; the hand will instead turn the ocean red. The expected quantities are reversed, so one man's guilt is made larger than the sea. The image refuses the ordinary consolation of scale, in which a small stain is lost in a large volume of water. The hand stains the ocean rather than the ocean cleaning the hand

  8. Why are "incarnadine" and "making the green one red" placed together?
    Show the full solution

    A Latinate polysyllable is followed by five monosyllables of plain English saying the same thing. The repetition in a lower register is what a man does when the grand statement has not relieved him, so the second line registers that the first one failed. Shakespeare stages the failure of eloquence inside eloquence. The plain restatement shows the grand phrase did not help

  9. Trace blood from act 1 to act 5.
    Show the full solution

    In act 1 the captain's report makes blood a mark of valor, with Macbeth unseaming a rebel. In act 2 it will not wash off. In act 3 it walks in as Banquo's ghost. In act 5 it is on Lady Macbeth's sleepwalking hands. The same substance travels from honor through guilt to madness without ever being redefined explicitly. Valor, then guilt, then haunting, then madness

  10. State the method an image-pattern essay uses.
    Show the full solution

    Choose one pattern, find its first appearance, find its last, and describe what changed in between. That structure produces a whole essay with a claim, a sequence of evidence and a developmental argument. It is available in every Shakespeare play and is clearest in Macbeth, which is short enough to trace completely. First appearance, last appearance, and what changed

Lesson 2.8 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.5

The metaphysical conceit

Donne's poems argue. They begin in the middle of a conversation, take an image from geometry or cartography or medicine, and push it further than it should go, and the pushing is the poem.

The key ideas
  1. The metaphysical poets include Donne, Herbert and Marvell, grouped retrospectively by Samuel Johnson.
  2. A conceit is an extended and surprising comparison, developed at length rather than glanced at.
  3. The metaphysical conceit is drawn from learning, from compasses, maps, alchemy and law rather than from nature.
  4. Johnson's complaint was that heterogeneous ideas are yoked by violence together.
  5. Donne's poems are dramatic, beginning abruptly and addressing someone directly.
  6. The meter is rough on purpose, and Ben Jonson said Donne deserved hanging for not keeping accent.
  7. The Songs and Sonnets and the Holy Sonnets use the same techniques for love and for God.
  8. Donne became Dean of St Paul's in 1621, and his later poems are sermons in verse.

Where students lose marks: calling a conceit clever and moving on. Follow the comparison to its end and check whether it holds. Donne's best conceits do hold, and saying exactly how is the analysis.

Worked example

The texts. John Donne, "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" and Holy Sonnet 10, both published 1633. Public domain.

If they be two, they are two so
As stiff twin compasses are two;
Thy soul, the fixed foot, makes no show
To move, but doth, if the other do.

And though it in the centre sit,
Yet when the other far doth roam,
It leans and hearkens after it,
And grows erect, as that comes home.

Death, be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadful, for thou art not so.

Step one: name the image. A drawing compass, the instrument with two legs used to make circles. Not a romantic object and not a natural one, which is what makes it metaphysical.

Step two: test the comparison's first claim. The fixed foot appears stationary and in fact moves whenever the other does. Anyone who has used a compass knows this is true, so the conceit begins with an accurate physical observation.

Step three: follow it further. "It leans and hearkens after it." The fixed leg does tilt as the drawing leg travels outward. The comparison is still describing the instrument accurately while also describing a person waiting at home.

Step four: follow it to the end. "And grows erect, as that comes home." The leg straightens as the circle closes. Three physical facts about a compass have each carried an emotional meaning without any strain, which is why the conceit works.

Step five: state what the geometry adds. A compass draws a circle, which is closed and returns to its beginning. The instrument's purpose guarantees the traveler's return, so the poem's consolation is built into the object rather than asserted.

Step six: answer Johnson. He objected that metaphysical images yoke heterogeneous ideas by violence. Here nothing is violent: every property used is a real property of the object, and the comparison gets more accurate the longer it runs.

Step seven: turn to the Holy Sonnet's opening. "Death, be not proud." Donne begins by addressing Death directly and insulting it, which is a dramatic opening in the middle of an argument nobody has heard the beginning of.

Step eight: state the technique the two poems share. An abrupt address, a counterintuitive proposition, and an extended proof. Donne's poems are structured like arguments because he was trained in law and later preached for a living, and the form of a Donne poem is the form of a case.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Name three metaphysical poets.
    Show the full solution

    Donne, Herbert, Marvell

  2. Define a conceit.
    Show the full solution

    An extended and surprising comparison developed at length

  3. What was Johnson's complaint about the metaphysicals?
    Show the full solution

    That heterogeneous ideas are yoked by violence together

  4. What image does "A Valediction" use?
    Show the full solution

    A pair of drawing compasses

  5. What position did Donne hold from 1621?
    Show the full solution

    Dean of St Paul's

  6. Why does the compass conceit hold up under testing?
    Show the full solution

    Because each claim is a real property of the instrument. The fixed foot does move when the other moves, it does lean as the drawing leg travels, and it does straighten as the circle closes. Three physical facts each carry an emotional meaning without strain, so the comparison becomes more accurate the longer it runs. Every emotional claim matches a real property of the object

  7. What does the geometry contribute that the image alone does not?
    Show the full solution

    A compass draws a circle, which is closed and ends where it began. The instrument's purpose guarantees the traveler's return, so the poem's consolation is built into the object rather than merely asserted by the speaker. The argument is delegated to a piece of equipment. The circle's closure guarantees the return

  8. Answer Johnson's objection using this poem.
    Show the full solution

    Nothing here is yoked by violence. Every property Donne uses is a genuine property of a compass, and the comparison gets more exact as it is extended rather than less. Johnson's charge describes weak metaphysical writing accurately and fails against the strongest examples, which is worth saying in those terms rather than simply disagreeing. The comparison strengthens as it extends, so no violence is needed

  9. What does "Death, be not proud" do as an opening?
    Show the full solution

    It addresses Death directly and insults it, dropping the reader into the middle of an argument whose beginning was never heard. Donne's openings are dramatic in this way throughout: a voice is already speaking to someone, already contradicting something, and the poem's work is to justify a position already taken. It begins mid-argument, addressing and insulting its opponent

  10. What structure do Donne's poems share, and why?
    Show the full solution

    An abrupt address, a counterintuitive proposition and an extended proof. He was trained in law and later preached for a living, so the form of a Donne poem is the form of a case: assert, develop, and close by having established something the reader would have denied at the start. The shape of a legal or homiletic argument

Lesson 2.9 · Unit 2 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.6

The grand style, and the problem of Satan

Paradise Lost is the most ambitious poem in English and it has one famous difficulty: the character who gets the best speeches is the villain. Whether that is a flaw, a trap or the poem's actual argument has been debated for three hundred years.

The key ideas
  1. John Milton published Paradise Lost in 1667, in ten books, revised to twelve in 1674.
  2. He was blind from 1652 and dictated the poem to amanuenses.
  3. He chose blank verse and defended the choice in a preface attacking rhyme as a bondage.
  4. The grand style uses Latinate syntax, long periodic sentences, inverted word order and epic simile.
  5. The stated purpose is to justify the ways of God to men.
  6. Satan has the poem's most quoted lines, and most of them are in books 1 and 2.
  7. Blake wrote that Milton was of the Devil's party without knowing it, which set the terms of the debate.
  8. The poem degrades Satan steadily, from archangel to toad to serpent, which is the counter-argument to Blake.

Where students lose marks: quoting "Better to reign in Hell" as the poem's view. It is Satan's view, delivered in book 1, and the poem spends eleven more books showing what it leads to.

Worked example

The text. John Milton, Paradise Lost, book 1, 1667. Public domain.

Of Man's first disobedience, and the fruit
Of that forbidden tree whose mortal taste
Brought death into the world, and all our woe,
With loss of Eden, till one greater Man
Restore us, and regain the blissful seat,
Sing, Heavenly Muse...

The mind is its own place, and in itself
Can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven.
...Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven.

Satan

Step one: find the main verb of the first sentence. "Sing", in line six. Five lines of subject matter arrive before the poem asks the Muse to begin, which is Latinate syntax imported into English.

Step two: state what that syntax accomplishes. It holds a great deal in suspension. The reader must carry disobedience, the fruit, death, woe and the loss of Eden before receiving the verb, and the effort of holding them is part of the poem's scale.

Step three: notice what the opening includes. The fall and the redemption, both, in six lines. The poem announces its ending in its first sentence, so suspense is never the point.

Step four: read Satan's first claim. "The mind is its own place." It is a statement of absolute interior sovereignty, and it is magnificent, and the poem will spend eleven books demonstrating that it is false.

Step five: state how the poem refutes it. Satan carries hell with him wherever he goes and says so himself in book 4: "Which way I fly is Hell; myself am Hell." The refutation is placed in his own mouth, three books after the boast.

Step six: assess "Better to reign in Hell". It is the most quoted line in the poem and it is a rationalization spoken by someone who has just lost a war. Quoting it as the poem's position ignores that the speaker is trying to keep an army together.

Step seven: trace the degradation. Satan appears as an archangel in book 1, squats as a toad at Eve's ear in book 4, enters a serpent in book 9, and is hissed at in book 10 when his followers are turned to snakes. The poem answers Blake structurally.

Step eight: state the position worth arguing. That the poem makes Satan attractive on purpose, so that the reader experiences the appeal of rebellion and then watches it curdle. On that reading Blake is right about the effect and wrong about the intention, which is the most defensible account of a genuine difficulty.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Paradise Lost published, and in how many books?
    Show the full solution

    1667 in ten books, revised to twelve in 1674

  2. What verse form does Milton use, and how did he defend it?
    Show the full solution

    Blank verse, defended in a preface attacking rhyme as bondage

  3. State the poem's declared purpose.
    Show the full solution

    To justify the ways of God to men

  4. What did Blake say about Milton?
    Show the full solution

    That he was of the Devil's party without knowing it

  5. Name three features of the grand style.
    Show the full solution

    Latinate syntax, long periodic sentences, inverted word order, epic simile

  6. What does the delayed main verb accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    It holds a great deal in suspension. The reader must carry disobedience, the fruit, death, woe and the loss of Eden for five lines before the verb "Sing" arrives, and the effort of holding them is part of the poem's scale. Latinate syntax imported into English forces a reader to work at the rate the poem sets. It makes the reader hold the whole subject before the verb arrives

  7. Why does the poem announce its ending in the first sentence?
    Show the full solution

    Because suspense is not the point. The opening includes both the fall and the redemption by "one greater Man", so the reader knows the outcome before the poem begins. What the poem offers instead is the experience of watching a known catastrophe arrive, which is how epic has worked since Homer. The interest is in the process, not the outcome

  8. How does the poem refute "the mind is its own place"?
    Show the full solution

    By putting the refutation in Satan's own mouth. In book 4 he says "Which way I fly is Hell; myself am Hell", three books after claiming the mind can make a heaven of hell. The boast of interior sovereignty is answered by the speaker who made it, which is more damaging than any narrator's comment. Satan himself says he carries hell with him

  9. Assess "Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven" in context.
    Show the full solution

    It is a rationalization spoken by someone who has just lost a war and needs to hold an army together. Quoting it as the poem's position ignores the speaker's situation and his audience entirely. The line is magnificent and it is also a commander improvising morale out of a catastrophe. A defeated commander improvising morale

  10. State the most defensible position on the Satan problem.
    Show the full solution

    That the poem makes Satan attractive on purpose, so the reader experiences the appeal of rebellion and then watches it curdle through the degradation from archangel to toad to serpent to hissing snake. On that reading Blake is right about the effect and wrong about the intention, which accounts for both the power of book 1 and the structure of the remaining eleven. The appeal is deliberate, and the poem spends eleven books spending it

Unit 2 review · The Renaissance

Ten questions across the whole unit

Questions 1 to 5 check that you hold the terms. Questions 6 to 10 require you to reason across the nine lessons.

  1. Give the divisions and rhyme schemes of the two sonnet forms.
    Show the full solution

    Petrarchan: octave and sestet, ABBAABBA. English: three quatrains and a couplet, ABAB CDCD EFEF GG

  2. Where does the volta fall in a Petrarchan sonnet?
    Show the full solution

    At line nine

  3. Define blank verse.
    Show the full solution

    Unrhymed iambic pentameter

  4. What is a metaphysical conceit?
    Show the full solution

    An extended surprising comparison drawn from learning rather than from nature

  5. State the declared purpose of Paradise Lost.
    Show the full solution

    To justify the ways of God to men

  6. Why does the English sonnet's rhyme scheme suit English?
    Show the full solution

    English has far fewer available rhymes than Italian, and ABAB CDCD EFEF GG needs only two words per rhyming sound where ABBAABBA needs four. The redistribution also creates three quatrains, which lets a poet give three versions of one idea and then close with a couplet, a different machine from an octave and sestet. It needs only two words per sound, and creates three quatrains

  7. Test whether the couplet of Sonnet 73 earns its conclusion.
    Show the full solution

    It does not. The quatrains establish decline through three accelerating images, and the couplet asserts that perceiving it strengthens the beloved's love, which nothing has established. The sonnet is more moving for it: a man cataloguing his own decay ends by telling the person he loves that it should make them love him more. No, and the poem is better for the unearned claim

  8. Explain why Hamlet's delay is rational rather than temperamental.
    Show the full solution

    He is asked to kill an anointed king on the testimony of a ghost that may be a devil working to damn him, so he stages the Mousetrap as a controlled test with an independent observer. He also kills Polonius through a curtain in under a second and sends two men to execution at sea, so he is capable of instant ruthless action. The delay is specific to an act that requires certainty. The evidence is a ghost, and he acts instantly elsewhere

  9. Why does Donne's compass conceit survive testing?
    Show the full solution

    Every emotional claim matches a real property of the instrument: the fixed foot does move when the other moves, it does lean as the drawing leg travels, and it does straighten as the circle closes. The comparison becomes more accurate the longer it runs, which answers Johnson's charge that metaphysical images yoke heterogeneous ideas by violence. Each claim matches a real property of a compass

  10. State the most defensible position on Milton's Satan.
    Show the full solution

    That the poem makes him attractive on purpose, so a reader experiences the appeal of rebellion and then watches it curdle through the degradation from archangel to toad to serpent to hissing snake. Satan's own line in book 4, "myself am Hell", refutes his boast in book 1. Blake is right about the effect and wrong about the intention. The appeal is deliberate and the poem spends eleven books on it

Lesson 3.1 · Unit 3 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.4

The heroic couplet and the pleasure of closure

For about a hundred years the heroic couplet was what English poetry sounded like. It is a machine for making statements feel finished, and learning how it works explains both why the eighteenth century loved it and why the Romantics abandoned it.

The key ideas
  1. A heroic couplet is two rhymed lines of iambic pentameter, usually end-stopped.
  2. End-stopped means the sense closes with the line, so the couplet is a complete unit of thought.
  3. The caesura divides each line, which gives the poet four positions to balance against each other.
  4. Antithesis is the standard move, setting two things against each other across the caesura or the rhyme.
  5. Zeugma joins unlike things to one verb, and Pope uses it to make a judgment without stating one.
  6. Alexander Pope was the period's master of the form, and he made a living from his poetry, which was then unusual.
  7. Neoclassicism valued order, balance, decorum and the ancients, and the couplet embodies all four.
  8. Wit in this period means intelligence and aptness, not humor.

Where students lose marks: saying the couplet is monotonous. Show where Pope varies it: the run-on couplet, the shifted caesura, the triplet, the alexandrine. The regularity exists so that departures register.

Worked example

The text. Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism, 1711. Public domain.

A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again.

True ease in writing comes from art, not chance,
As those move easiest who have learn'd to dance.
'Tis not enough no harshness gives offence,
The sound must seem an Echo to the sense.

Step one: mark the structure of the first couplet. Line one makes a claim, line two gives the remedy, and each line stops at its end. Two lines, one complete argument.

Step two: find the antithesis. "Drink deep, or taste not." Two options set against each other across a caesura, and the grammar excludes the middle position the first line warned about.

Step three: read the paradox in the second couplet. Shallow draughts intoxicate, large ones sober. The reversal of the ordinary fact about drinking is the point, and it is made possible by the rhyme, which forces brain and again into relation.

Step four: work the dancing comparison. "Those move easiest who have learn'd to dance." Ease is the product of training, so what looks natural is the result of labor. Pope applies this to writing while demonstrating it.

Step five: state what "the sound must seem an Echo to the sense" demands. That the noise a line makes should imitate what it describes. It is a rule, and Pope proves it in the lines that follow by writing a slow line about slowness and a fast one about speed.

Step six: notice "seem". Not be an echo but seem one. Pope concedes that the effect is an illusion produced by craft, which is the same concession the dance comparison made.

Step seven: identify why the form suits the content. A poetry arguing for order, proportion and judgment is written in the most balanced form available. The couplet does not merely carry neoclassical values; it performs them.

Step eight: state what the Romantics rejected. Exactly this. A form designed to make statements feel finished is the wrong instrument for a poetry about process, doubt and feeling, which is why lesson 3.4 begins with a manifesto against it.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Define a heroic couplet.
    Show the full solution

    Two rhymed, usually end-stopped lines of iambic pentameter

  2. What does end-stopped mean?
    Show the full solution

    The sense closes with the line

  3. Define antithesis and zeugma.
    Show the full solution

    Antithesis sets two things against each other; zeugma joins unlike things to one verb

  4. Name four neoclassical values.
    Show the full solution

    Order, balance, decorum, respect for the ancients

  5. What does wit mean in this period?
    Show the full solution

    Intelligence and aptness, not humor

  6. How does the first couplet's grammar exclude a middle position?
    Show the full solution

    "Drink deep, or taste not" offers two options across a caesura and nothing between them. The first line warned that a little learning is dangerous, and the second line's syntax makes a little learning grammatically unavailable. The form enacts the exclusion the content recommends. The either-or removes the little learning the couplet warns about

  7. Analyze the paradox about drinking.
    Show the full solution

    Shallow draughts intoxicate and large ones sober, which reverses the ordinary fact about drinking. The rhyme forces "brain" and "again" into relation so the two claims arrive as a pair, and the reversal registers as wit rather than as error. The couplet makes the paradox feel demonstrated rather than asserted. It reverses the literal fact, and the rhyme makes the reversal land

  8. What does the dancing comparison concede?
    Show the full solution

    That ease is the product of training. Those who move most easily have learned to dance, so what looks natural is the result of labor. Pope applies this to writing while demonstrating it in lines whose apparent effortlessness is the most worked thing on the page. Apparent naturalness is achieved by training

  9. Why does Pope write "seem an Echo" rather than "be"?
    Show the full solution

    Because the effect is an illusion produced by craft. Sound cannot actually be meaning, and a poet who claimed it could would be making a mystical rather than a technical claim. "Seem" keeps the rule inside the domain of skill, which is the same concession the dance comparison made two lines earlier. It is an effect of craft, not a natural identity

  10. Why did the Romantics reject this form?
    Show the full solution

    Because a form designed to make statements feel finished is the wrong instrument for a poetry about process, doubt and feeling. The couplet does not merely carry neoclassical values of order and proportion; it performs them, so keeping the form would have meant keeping the argument. The Lyrical Ballads preface attacks precisely this. Closure is the wrong effect for a poetry of process

Lesson 3.2 · Unit 3 · RL.11-12.6, RL.11-12.5

Satire by scale

The mock epic takes the machinery of Homer and Virgil and applies it to something trivial. The joke is not that the subject is small but that the form insists on treating it as large, and the gap between them is where the satire happens.

The key ideas
  1. The Rape of the Lock was published in 1712 and expanded in 1714.
  2. It was written to reconcile two families after a young man cut a lock of a young woman's hair.
  3. A mock epic applies epic conventions to a trivial subject, without mocking epic itself.
  4. The conventions Pope uses include the invocation, the arming of the hero, the supernatural machinery, the journey and the battle.
  5. The sylphs replace the gods, and they are as powerless as they are decorative.
  6. The dressing table is described as an altar, and the coffee house as a council of war.
  7. The target is not Belinda but a society that has made this the scale of its crises.
  8. Bathos is the drop from the elevated to the trivial, and Pope engineers it constantly.

Where students lose marks: writing that Pope is attacking women. The poem's affection for Belinda is real and the criticism is aimed at a world that gives her nothing more consequential to do.

Worked example

The text. Alexander Pope, The Rape of the Lock, 1714. Public domain.

Here thou, great Anna! whom three realms obey,
Dost sometimes counsel take, and sometimes tea.

Whether the nymph shall break Diana's law,
Or some frail china jar receive a flaw;
Or stain her honour, or her new brocade;
Forget her prayers, or miss a masquerade;
Or lose her heart, or necklace, at a ball.

Step one: identify the figure in the first couplet. Zeugma. One verb, "take", governs counsel and tea, two things of wholly different weight.

Step two: state what the zeugma argues. That the queen's court treats governing and refreshment as equivalent activities. The grammar makes the claim, and Pope never has to say it, which is the same technique Chaucer used with description.

Step three: notice the rhyme. Obey and tea. The rhyme forces a word of sovereign authority into a pair with a beverage, so the sound completes the joke the syntax started.

Step four: read the second passage's list. Five pairs, each joining a moral catastrophe to a social inconvenience: chastity and a cracked jar, honor and a dress, prayers and a party, a heart and a necklace.

Step five: state what the pairing establishes. Not that these things are equal but that Belinda's world treats them as equal. Pope is describing a system of values, not endorsing one, and the accumulation is what makes the point undeniable.

Step six: notice the order within each pair. The serious item comes first and the trivial one takes the rhyme position. The couplet's strongest emphasis falls on the brocade rather than on the honor, which is the poem's judgment delivered by meter.

Step seven: define bathos from this. The drop from the elevated to the trivial, engineered rather than accidental. Each of these lines climbs and then falls in the space of five words.

Step eight: state the poem's actual target. A leisured society that has given a clever young woman nothing to lose except her reputation and her ornaments. The satire is affectionate toward Belinda and merciless about her world, and an essay that confuses the two has the poem backwards.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was The Rape of the Lock published?
    Show the full solution

    1712, expanded in 1714

  2. What occasioned the poem?
    Show the full solution

    A young man cutting a lock of a young woman's hair, and the family quarrel that followed

  3. Define a mock epic.
    Show the full solution

    Epic conventions applied to a trivial subject

  4. What replaces the gods in this poem?
    Show the full solution

    The sylphs

  5. Define bathos.
    Show the full solution

    The drop from the elevated to the trivial

  6. Analyze the zeugma in the Queen Anne couplet.
    Show the full solution

    One verb, "take", governs counsel and tea, two things of entirely different weight, so the grammar asserts that the court treats governing and refreshment as equivalent activities. The rhyme of "obey" with "tea" completes the joke by pairing sovereign authority with a beverage. Pope never states the criticism; the syntax does. One verb equates governing with refreshment

  7. What does the list of pairs establish?
    Show the full solution

    Not that chastity and a china jar are equal but that Belinda's world treats them as equal. Pope is describing a system of values rather than endorsing one, and the accumulation of five pairs in five lines makes the observation impossible to dismiss as a single joke. That her society values them equally, not that they are

  8. Why does the trivial item take the rhyme position?
    Show the full solution

    Because the couplet's strongest emphasis falls at the line's end. Honor comes first and brocade takes the rhyme, so the meter gives its weight to the dress. The poem's judgment is delivered by prosody rather than by statement, which is the most characteristic thing about Pope's technique. Emphasis falls at the rhyme, so the meter weights the trivial

  9. Why is the mock epic not an attack on epic?
    Show the full solution

    Because the form is used at full strength and taken seriously. Pope's invocation, arming, journey and battle are competently executed epic machinery, and the comedy comes from the subject they are applied to. Mocking epic would require making the conventions ridiculous, which the poem never does. The conventions are used properly; only the subject is small

  10. State the poem's actual target.
    Show the full solution

    A leisured society that has given a clever young woman nothing to lose except her reputation and her ornaments. The satire is affectionate toward Belinda and merciless about the world she lives in, and an essay that reads it as an attack on her, or on women generally, has the poem backwards. The society, not Belinda

Lesson 3.3 · Unit 3 · RI.11-12.6, RL.11-12.9

The century turning toward feeling

Romanticism did not arrive from nowhere in 1798. The second half of the eighteenth century kept the couplet and changed what it was used for, and Gray's Elegy is the transitional poem that shows the shift happening.

The key ideas
  1. Samuel Johnson published his Dictionary in 1755, after about eight years of work.
  2. He defined words by quoting actual usage, which was the method's innovation.
  3. His Lives of the Poets, 1779 to 1781, is the beginning of English literary biography.
  4. Thomas Gray's Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard, 1751, was the century's most popular poem.
  5. It uses the heroic quatrain, ABAB in iambic pentameter, rather than the couplet.
  6. Its subject is the obscure dead, which no major poem had taken seriously before.
  7. Graveyard poetry is the mid-century mode that made melancholy a respectable subject.
  8. Sensibility is the period's term for refined feeling treated as a virtue.

Where students lose marks: treating the eighteenth century as a block of dry reason that Romanticism interrupted. Gray was writing about feeling in 1751, and the Romantics inherited more than they overturned.

Worked example

The texts. Thomas Gray, Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard, 1751; Samuel Johnson, Preface to the Dictionary, 1755. Both public domain.

Full many a gem of purest ray serene,
The dark unfathom'd caves of ocean bear:
Full many a flower is born to blush unseen,
And waste its sweetness on the desert air.

Some village-Hampden, that with dauntless breast
The little tyrant of his fields withstood;
Some mute inglorious Milton here may rest,
Some Cromwell guiltless of his country's blood.

I have devoted this book, the labour of years, to the honour of my country... and I have protracted my work till most of those whom I wished to please have sunk into the grave, and success and miscarriage are empty sounds.

Johnson

Step one: notice the subject. The people buried in a village churchyard, who did nothing recorded. No earlier major English poem had made the undistinguished dead its central concern.

Step two: read the two images of waste. A gem in a cave nobody has reached and a flower blooming where nobody sees. Both are valuable, both are unobserved, and neither is diminished by the lack of a witness.

Step three: state what that argues. That worth is independent of recognition. This is a direct challenge to the heroic and classical assumption, running from Beowulf's lof to Pope's reputation, that fame is the measure of a life.

Step four: work the three names. Hampden, Milton and Cromwell, all seventeenth-century figures. Gray imagines the village dead as unrealized versions of them, which makes the claim historical rather than sentimental.

Step five: notice what the third name concedes. "Some Cromwell guiltless of his country's blood." Obscurity prevented harm as well as achievement. Gray is honest enough to say that the unrecognized life avoided the crimes as well as the glory.

Step six: read the form. The heroic quatrain, ABAB, which delays closure by two lines compared with a couplet. That small change lets the stanza hold a thought in suspension, which suits a poem about what was never completed.

Step seven: turn to Johnson's preface. A great public work is concluded, and the paragraph is about the people who did not live to see it. "Success and miscarriage are empty sounds" is the same conclusion Gray reaches.

Step eight: state the transition this unit documents. Both writers keep the eighteenth century's forms and turn them toward loss, obscurity and private feeling. The Romantics did not invent that subject; they inherited it and changed the verse it was written in.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When did Johnson publish his Dictionary, and what was its method?
    Show the full solution

    1755; defining words by quoting actual usage

  2. When was Gray's Elegy published?
    Show the full solution

    1751

  3. What form does the Elegy use?
    Show the full solution

    The heroic quatrain, ABAB in iambic pentameter

  4. What is graveyard poetry?
    Show the full solution

    The mid-century mode that made melancholy a respectable subject

  5. What does sensibility mean in this period?
    Show the full solution

    Refined feeling treated as a virtue

  6. What do the gem and the flower argue?
    Show the full solution

    That worth is independent of recognition. A gem in an unreached cave and a flower blooming unseen are both valuable and neither is diminished by the absence of a witness. That is a direct challenge to the assumption running from Beowulf's lof to Pope's reputation that fame is the measure of a life. Worth does not depend on being seen

  7. Why name Hampden, Milton and Cromwell specifically?
    Show the full solution

    They are seventeenth-century figures whose names carry precise historical weight, so imagining the village dead as unrealized versions of them makes the claim historical rather than sentimental. A general statement that some of them might have been great would be a platitude; three named men turn it into a proposition. Named historical figures make the claim specific rather than sentimental

  8. What does "some Cromwell guiltless of his country's blood" concede?
    Show the full solution

    That obscurity prevented harm as well as achievement. Gray is honest enough to say the unrecognized life avoided the crimes along with the glory, which keeps the poem from being a simple lament for wasted talent. The concession is what makes the argument survive scrutiny. Obscurity prevented the crimes as well as the greatness

  9. Why does the quatrain suit this poem better than a couplet?
    Show the full solution

    ABAB delays closure by two lines, so the stanza holds a thought in suspension instead of snapping it shut. A poem about lives that were never completed is badly served by a form built to make statements feel finished, and Gray's small formal change carries a large part of the effect. It delays closure, which suits a poem about what was never finished

  10. State the transition these two writers document.
    Show the full solution

    Both keep the eighteenth century's forms and turn them toward loss, obscurity and private feeling. Johnson finishes a great public work and writes about the people who did not live to see it; Gray writes an elegy for people history did not record. The Romantics inherited this subject rather than inventing it, and changed the verse it was written in. Old forms turned toward loss and private feeling

Lesson 3.4 · Unit 3 · RI.11-12.5, RI.11-12.8

A new theory of poetry

Wordsworth's preface to the second edition of Lyrical Ballads is the most consequential piece of literary criticism written in English. It is a manifesto with definitions in it, and almost every subsequent argument about poetry refers back to it.

The key ideas
  1. Lyrical Ballads appeared in 1798, by Wordsworth and Coleridge, with the preface added in 1800.
  2. The subject should be humble and rustic life, because there the passions are less restrained.
  3. The language should be a selection of the real language of men, not poetic diction.
  4. Poetry is the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings, and this is only half the definition.
  5. It takes its origin from emotion recollected in tranquillity, which is the other half and is usually dropped.
  6. The poet is a man speaking to men, not a separate order of being.
  7. Poetic diction is the enemy, meaning the stock phrases the eighteenth century had accumulated.
  8. The preface is an argument, with premises and objections answered, not a series of slogans.

Where students lose marks: quoting "spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings" and stopping. Wordsworth immediately adds that the emotion is recollected in tranquillity, so the theory is about recall and composition rather than about writing while upset.

Worked example

The text. William Wordsworth, Preface to Lyrical Ballads, 1800. Public domain.

Low and rustic life was generally chosen, because in that condition, the essential passions of the heart find a better soil in which they can attain their maturity, are less under restraint, and speak a plainer and more emphatic language.

I have said that Poetry is the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings: it takes its origin from emotion recollected in tranquillity: the emotion is contemplated till by a species of reaction the tranquillity gradually disappears, and an emotion, kindred to that which was before the subject of contemplation, is gradually produced, and does itself actually exist in the mind.

Step one: read the first passage as an argument with a reason. Rustic life is chosen "because" the passions are less restrained there. The claim has a premise, which makes it testable rather than a preference.

Step two: state the objection it invites. That rural people are not in fact more emotionally direct, and that Wordsworth is idealizing a class he observed rather than belonged to. Coleridge made this objection at length in Biographia Literaria.

Step three: identify what is being rejected. Poetic diction: the stock phrases an eighteenth-century poet reached for, finny tribe for fish, feathered choir for birds. Wordsworth wants a vocabulary that has not been pre-approved as poetic.

Step four: read the famous definition in full. Spontaneous overflow, then recollected in tranquillity, then contemplated until the tranquillity disappears and a kindred emotion is produced. Four stages, not one.

Step five: state what the full definition actually describes. A deliberate process: feel, wait, remember, contemplate until the feeling returns, then write. That is almost the opposite of writing in the grip of an emotion, which is how the half-quotation is usually understood.

Step six: notice "kindred to". The emotion produced in composition is similar to the original, not identical. Wordsworth is precise about the fact that a poem contains a manufactured feeling resembling a real one.

Step seven: state what "a man speaking to men" rejects. The idea of the poet as a separate order of being with special access. It is a democratic claim about authority that matches the argument about language.

Step eight: state the preface's structure as an argument. Premise about where passion is clearest, conclusion about subject matter, corollary about language, definition of the process, and a claim about the poet's standing. Each step follows, which is why a document arguing for spontaneity is itself carefully reasoned.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When did Lyrical Ballads appear, and when the preface?
    Show the full solution

    1798; the preface added in 1800

  2. What subject does Wordsworth choose, and why?
    Show the full solution

    Low and rustic life, because the passions are less restrained there

  3. Give the full definition of poetry from the preface.
    Show the full solution

    The spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings, taking its origin from emotion recollected in tranquillity

  4. What is poetic diction?
    Show the full solution

    The stock phrases the eighteenth century had accumulated

  5. How does Wordsworth describe the poet?
    Show the full solution

    A man speaking to men

  6. What objection does the rustic-life claim invite?
    Show the full solution

    That rural people are not in fact more emotionally direct, and that Wordsworth is idealizing a class he observed rather than belonged to. Coleridge made this objection at length in Biographia Literaria, which is worth citing because it shows the disagreement was internal to the movement rather than imposed later. That it idealizes a class, an objection Coleridge made

  7. Describe the four stages of the full definition.
    Show the full solution

    Feel powerfully; recollect in tranquillity; contemplate the memory until the tranquillity disappears; write while an emotion kindred to the original is present. That is a deliberate process with a waiting period in it, which is almost the opposite of writing in the grip of a feeling. Feel, wait, recollect, contemplate until the feeling returns

  8. What does "kindred to" concede?
    Show the full solution

    That the emotion present during composition is similar to the original rather than identical. Wordsworth is precise about the fact that a poem contains a manufactured feeling resembling a real one, which is a strikingly unsentimental thing for the founding document of Romantic poetry to say. The composing emotion resembles the original; it is not it

  9. What does "a man speaking to men" reject?
    Show the full solution

    The poet as a separate order of being with privileged access to truth. It is a democratic claim about authority, and it matches the argument about language: if the poet is an ordinary person, poetry should use ordinary words. The two positions are the same position stated twice. Poetic authority as a special order of being

  10. Why is it worth noting that the preface is carefully reasoned?
    Show the full solution

    Because a document arguing for spontaneity is itself a structured argument: a premise about where passion is clearest, a conclusion about subject matter, a corollary about language, a staged definition of composition, and a claim about the poet's standing. The manifesto's form contradicts the caricature of Romanticism as the abandonment of thought. The case for spontaneity is made by rigorous argument

Lesson 3.5 · Unit 3 · RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.5

Tintern Abbey and the growth of a mind

Wordsworth's great subject is not nature. It is memory, and specifically what happens to a person's relation to a place when they return to it after years away. Tintern Abbey is the poem that establishes the pattern.

The key ideas
  1. "Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey" appeared in Lyrical Ballads, 1798.
  2. The conversation poem is the form: blank verse, a specific place, a silent listener, and a return to the opening.
  3. Coleridge invented the form and Wordsworth perfected it.
  4. The poem describes three stages of a relation to nature: boyhood appetite, youthful passion, and adult thought.
  5. The spot of time is Wordsworth's term for a remembered moment that nourishes the mind afterward.
  6. Five years have passed since the earlier visit, and the poem states this in its first line.
  7. Dorothy is the silent listener, and the poem turns to her in its final movement.
  8. The claim is about compensation: something is lost with age, and something else is gained.

Where students lose marks: writing that Wordsworth loves nature. So does everyone. His argument is that a remembered landscape does measurable work on a person in cities years later, and that claim is specific and testable.

Worked example

The text. William Wordsworth, "Lines Composed a Few Miles above Tintern Abbey", 1798. Public domain.

Five years have past; five summers, with the length
Of five long winters! and again I hear
These waters, rolling from their mountain-springs
With a soft inland murmur.

These beauteous forms,
Through a long absence, have not been to me
As is a landscape to a blind man's eye:
But oft, in lonely rooms, and 'mid the din
Of towns and cities, I have owed to them,
In hours of weariness, sensations sweet,
Felt in the blood, and felt along the heart.

Step one: count the repetitions in the opening. Five years, five summers, five winters. The same interval named three times, each version making it longer.

Step two: state what the repetition does. Winters are said to be long and summers are not, so the accumulation makes the absence feel greater than the arithmetic. The poem begins by measuring time in a way that is emotionally rather than numerically accurate.

Step three: read the negative comparison. The landscape has not been to him as a landscape is to a blind man's eye. Wordsworth defines what memory did by first naming what it did not do, which forces the reader to imagine the alternative.

Step four: locate the claim. "In lonely rooms, and 'mid the din of towns and cities, I have owed to them... sensations sweet." The remembered landscape did work in a city, years later. That is the poem's thesis.

Step five: analyze "felt in the blood, and felt along the heart". Not thought, not recalled. The effect is physical, and the two prepositions locate it in two places, so the memory is described as circulating rather than as stored.

Step six: state why the physical language matters. It converts a claim about sentiment into a claim about the body, which is much harder to dismiss. A reader can deny that a memory is beautiful and cannot easily deny that a memory has affected how they feel.

Step seven: identify the three stages the poem sets out. The boy's animal appetite for the place, the young man's passionate and thoughtless love of it, and the adult who hears in it "the still, sad music of humanity". Each stage loses something the last one had.

Step eight: state the poem's real argument. Compensation. The immediate rapture is gone and what replaces it is a thinking relation to other people, and the poem insists this is an exchange rather than a decline. Whether the reader believes the insistence is where the essays are written.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Tintern Abbey published?
    Show the full solution

    1798, in Lyrical Ballads

  2. Name four features of the conversation poem.
    Show the full solution

    Blank verse, a specific place, a silent listener, a return to the opening

  3. How long has the speaker been away?
    Show the full solution

    Five years

  4. Who is the silent listener?
    Show the full solution

    Dorothy Wordsworth

  5. What is a spot of time?
    Show the full solution

    A remembered moment that nourishes the mind afterward

  6. What does the triple repetition of "five" accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    It makes the absence feel longer than the arithmetic. Winters are called long and summers are not, so naming the same interval three times with increasing weight measures the time emotionally rather than numerically. The poem's first gesture is to show that felt duration and counted duration differ. It measures the interval emotionally rather than numerically

  7. Why define memory by a negative comparison?
    Show the full solution

    Because it forces the reader to imagine the alternative. Saying the landscape has not been to him as it would be to a blind man's eye makes the reader construct the case where memory did nothing, and only then supply what actually happened. The definition arrives with its opposite already in the reader's mind. The reader must first imagine memory failing

  8. Analyze "felt in the blood, and felt along the heart".
    Show the full solution

    Not thought and not recalled but felt, twice, in two bodily locations. The two prepositions, in and along, describe the memory as circulating rather than stored, so a claim about sentiment becomes a claim about the body. A reader can deny that a memory is beautiful and cannot easily deny having been physically affected by one. Memory is described as circulating in the body

  9. Name the three stages the poem describes.
    Show the full solution

    The boy's animal appetite for the place, the young man's passionate and thoughtless love of it, and the adult who hears in it the still, sad music of humanity. Each stage loses something the previous one had, which is what makes the poem an argument rather than a description. Appetite, passion, then thought

  10. State the poem's real argument.
    Show the full solution

    Compensation. The immediate rapture is gone and what replaces it is a thinking relation to other people, and Wordsworth insists this is an exchange rather than a decline. Whether the reader believes the insistence is where the essays are written, since the poem protests its own consolation more than once. That what age takes is repaid by what it gives

Lesson 3.6 · Unit 3 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.2

The Ancient Mariner and the willing suspension of disbelief

Wordsworth took the ordinary and made it strange. Coleridge took the supernatural and made it credible, and the division of labor was explicit between them. The Ancient Mariner is the result, and it is the strangest famous poem in English.

The key ideas
  1. "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" opened Lyrical Ballads in 1798.
  2. Coleridge's task was the supernatural, and Wordsworth's was the ordinary, as Coleridge later explained.
  3. Willing suspension of disbelief is his phrase for what a reader grants a fantastic story.
  4. It requires a semblance of truth, meaning the reader must be given enough real detail to grant the rest.
  5. The form is the ballad stanza, four lines alternating four and three stresses, rhyming ABCB.
  6. The archaic spelling and the marginal gloss were added to make the poem look like an old document.
  7. The albatross is killed for no stated reason, which is the poem's central difficulty.
  8. The moral at the end is far too small for the poem, and Coleridge knew it.

Where students lose marks: accepting the closing moral about loving all creatures as the poem's meaning. Wordsworth complained the poem had no moral, and the tidy one at the end does not cover what the reader has seen.

Worked example

The texts. Samuel Taylor Coleridge, "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner", 1798, and Biographia Literaria, 1817. Both public domain. Coleridge's spelling is preserved as printed.

Day after day, day after day,
We stuck, nor breath nor motion;
As idle as a painted ship
Upon a painted ocean.

Water, water, every where,
And all the boards did shrink;
Water, water, every where,
Nor any drop to drink.

...to transfer from our inward nature a human interest and a semblance of truth sufficient to procure for these shadows of imagination that willing suspension of disbelief for the moment, which constitutes poetic faith.

Biographia Literaria

Step one: read the stanza form. Four lines, four stresses then three, rhyming ABCB. This is the ballad stanza, the oldest popular form in English, associated with anonymous folk narrative.

Step two: state why that form was chosen. A ballad is what an unlettered sailor would sing, and it carries no authorial voice. The form grants the poem the authority of something remembered rather than composed.

Step three: analyze the first stanza's repetition. "Day after day, day after day." The line uses its whole length to say one thing twice, which is what stalled time feels like. The verse stops moving because the ship has.

Step four: work "a painted ship upon a painted ocean". Both painted, so the image removes depth from the world. A painting has no water in it, which is also the stanza's next subject, and the metaphor and the plot agree.

Step five: read the water stanza. The repetition returns, and the punchline is a physical fact: surrounded by undrinkable sea. The horror is ordinary and specific, and it is the kind of detail Coleridge's theory requires.

Step six: apply the theory to the poem. "A semblance of truth sufficient" is what the thirst, the shrinking boards and the sun do. The reader is given verifiable physical suffering and therefore grants the ghost ship and the dead crew.

Step seven: notice what "willing" concedes. The reader chooses. Poetic faith is not imposed by the writer but extended by the reader in exchange for enough real detail, which makes the contract explicit and puts the writer's obligation first.

Step eight: address the killing of the albatross. No reason is given, in any version. A poem about crime and punishment withholds the motive entirely, and the closing moral about loving all creatures does not cover that absence. Write about the gap between the poem's events and its stated lesson.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. What was the division of labor in Lyrical Ballads?
    Show the full solution

    Coleridge took the supernatural, Wordsworth the ordinary

  2. Quote Coleridge's phrase for poetic faith.
    Show the full solution

    Willing suspension of disbelief for the moment

  3. What does that suspension require from the writer?
    Show the full solution

    A semblance of truth sufficient to procure it

  4. Describe the ballad stanza.
    Show the full solution

    Four lines alternating four and three stresses, rhyming ABCB

  5. What reason does the poem give for killing the albatross?
    Show the full solution

    None

  6. Why is the ballad stanza the right choice here?
    Show the full solution

    A ballad is what an unlettered sailor would sing, and it carries no authorial voice, so the poem arrives with the authority of something remembered rather than composed. The archaic spelling and the marginal gloss extend the same effect, presenting the text as a recovered document rather than a new poem. It gives the poem the authority of folk memory

  7. Analyze the repetition in "Day after day, day after day".
    Show the full solution

    The line uses its whole length to say one thing twice, which is what stalled time feels like. The verse stops advancing because the ship has stopped moving, so the reader experiences the becalming as a property of the poem rather than as information about the plot. The line stops moving because the ship has

  8. What does "a painted ship upon a painted ocean" remove?
    Show the full solution

    Depth. Both ship and sea are painted, so the world becomes a surface, and a painting contains no actual water, which is exactly the next stanza's subject. The metaphor and the plot agree with each other, which is why the image is more than decorative. It flattens the world, and a painting holds no water

  9. How does the poem earn its supernatural events?
    Show the full solution

    By supplying verifiable physical suffering first: thirst, shrinking boards, a punishing sun, a sea that cannot be drunk. That is the "semblance of truth sufficient" Coleridge's theory demands, and the reader who has accepted the thirst will extend poetic faith to the ghost ship and the reanimated crew. Real physical detail buys credit for the impossible

  10. What problem does the closing moral create?
    Show the full solution

    It is far too small for the poem. A bird is killed for no stated reason, two hundred men die, a dice game decides a fate, and the lesson offered at the end is to love all creatures. Wordsworth complained the poem had no moral, and the tidy one supplied does not cover what the reader has seen. Writing about that gap is the analysis. The stated lesson does not cover the poem's events

Lesson 3.7 · Unit 3 · RL.11-12.9, RL.11-12.4

The contrary states of the human soul

Blake published his poems himself, printed from plates he engraved and colored by hand, and he paired them. Reading a Song of Innocence without its answering Song of Experience is reading half of a two-part argument.

The key ideas
  1. Songs of Innocence appeared in 1789 and Songs of Experience in 1794, issued together thereafter.
  2. The subtitle calls them the two contrary states of the human soul.
  3. Many poems are paired, so a poem in one book answers a poem of the same or similar title in the other.
  4. Contrary does not mean opposite, and Blake wrote that without contraries there is no progression.
  5. He engraved and printed the books himself, so image and text were designed together.
  6. Innocence is not naivety and Experience is not wisdom; each sees what the other cannot.
  7. The chimney sweeper poems are the clearest pair, and both are about child labor.
  8. The meter is deliberately simple, often the meter of hymns and nursery rhymes, which is part of the argument.

Where students lose marks: treating Innocence as wrong and Experience as right. Blake's structure requires both, and the Experience speaker is often bitter in ways the poem does not endorse.

Worked example

The texts. William Blake, "The Chimney Sweeper" from Songs of Innocence, 1789, and "The Chimney Sweeper" from Songs of Experience, 1794. Both public domain. Blake's punctuation is preserved.

And so Tom awoke; and we rose in the dark
And got with our bags & our brushes to work.
Tho' the morning was cold, Tom was happy & warm;
So if all do their duty they need not fear harm.

Innocence

And because I am happy & dance & sing,
They think they have done me no injury,
And are gone to praise God & his Priest & King,
Who make up a heaven of our misery.

Experience

Step one: identify the speaker of the first poem. A child sweep, consoling another child after a dream of angels. He believes what he says, and the poem is in his voice throughout.

Step two: read the last line carefully. "So if all do their duty they need not fear harm." It is a maxim, and it is exactly what a child would be taught by the adults profiting from his labor.

Step three: state where the irony sits. Not in the child, who is sincere, but between the child's conclusion and the facts the poem has supplied: he rose in the dark, the morning was cold, and he went to work. The reader does the arithmetic.

Step four: turn to the Experience poem's logic. Because the child appears happy, his parents conclude they have done him no harm. He has identified the mechanism precisely: visible cheerfulness is read as evidence of wellbeing.

Step five: read the last line of the second poem. "Who make up a heaven of our misery." Three institutions, God, Priest and King, are named as the beneficiaries, and the verb "make up" means both construct and fabricate.

Step six: compare what each speaker can see. The Innocence child cannot see the exploitation and can genuinely comfort his friend. The Experience child sees the system exactly and can comfort nobody, including himself. Each has what the other lacks.

Step seven: state what "contrary" means here. Not that one is right. The two poems are two complete accounts, and Blake's claim is that a mind needs both, since without contraries there is no progression.

Step eight: notice the meter. Both poems use the simple measures of hymns and nursery rhymes. Writing about child labor in the meter children are sung to sleep with puts the form in direct conflict with the content, which is where a large part of the effect comes from.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When did the two books appear?
    Show the full solution

    Innocence in 1789, Experience in 1794

  2. What does the subtitle call them?
    Show the full solution

    The two contrary states of the human soul

  3. How were the books produced?
    Show the full solution

    Engraved, printed and colored by Blake himself

  4. What did Blake write about contraries?
    Show the full solution

    That without contraries there is no progression

  5. Whom does the Experience sweeper name as beneficiaries?
    Show the full solution

    God, his Priest and King

  6. Where does the irony sit in the Innocence poem?
    Show the full solution

    Between the child's conclusion and the facts the poem has already supplied. He is sincere: he rose in the dark, the morning was cold, he went to work, and then he says that those who do their duty need not fear harm. The reader does the arithmetic, and the child never does, which is why the poem is unbearable rather than satirical. Between the sincere maxim and the facts around it

  7. What mechanism does the Experience sweeper identify?
    Show the full solution

    That visible cheerfulness is read as evidence of wellbeing. Because he is happy and dances and sings, his parents conclude they have done him no injury. He has described exactly how the appearance of contentment licenses the people causing the harm, which is a sophisticated observation from a child in a chimney. Appearing happy is taken as proof of not being harmed

  8. Analyze "make up a heaven of our misery".
    Show the full solution

    "Make up" means both construct and fabricate, so the line says the institutions build their heaven out of the children's suffering and also that the heaven is invented. One phrase carries an economic accusation and a theological one, and naming God, Priest and King in sequence makes the accusation institutional rather than personal. It means both built from and invented

  9. What can each speaker see that the other cannot?
    Show the full solution

    The Innocence child cannot see the exploitation and can genuinely comfort his friend. The Experience child sees the system exactly and can comfort nobody, including himself. Each has what the other lacks, which is why Blake calls the states contrary rather than right and wrong. One can comfort and not see; the other sees and cannot comfort

  10. What does the meter contribute?
    Show the full solution

    Both poems use the simple measures of hymns and nursery rhymes, so poems about child labor arrive in the meter children are sung to sleep with. The form is in direct conflict with the content, and a large part of the effect comes from that friction rather than from anything either speaker says. Nursery-rhyme meter carrying an account of child labor

Lesson 3.8 · Unit 3 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.5

The ode, and negative capability

Keats wrote his major odes in a few months of 1819 and was dead within two years. They are the most concentrated poems in English on a single problem: whether permanence is worth having if it costs you the ability to change.

The key ideas
  1. An ode is a long lyric addressed to a subject, in an elevated register and a stanza of the poet's devising.
  2. Keats wrote five great odes in the spring of 1819, published that year and in 1820.
  3. His ode stanza combines a Shakespearean quatrain with a Petrarchan sestet, ten lines long.
  4. Negative capability is his term, from a letter of 1817, for remaining in uncertainty without reaching after fact and reason.
  5. Synaesthesia, describing one sense in the terms of another, is one of his signature devices.
  6. The odes are structured as an approach and a withdrawal, ending back where they began.
  7. The urn is silent and the nightingale's song ends, so both objects fail the speaker in their own way.
  8. The last lines of the Grecian Urn have been argued about for two centuries, partly over who is speaking.

Where students lose marks: quoting "Beauty is truth, truth beauty" as Keats's philosophy. The line is spoken by an urn, reported by a speaker, inside a poem that has just shown the urn's limitations at length.

Worked example

The text. John Keats, "Ode on a Grecian Urn", 1819, published 1820. Public domain.

Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
Not to the sensual ear, but, more endear'd,
Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone.

Bold Lover, never, never canst thou kiss,
Though winning near the goal, yet, do not grieve;
She cannot fade, though thou hast not thy bliss,
For ever wilt thou love, and she be fair!

Cold Pastoral!
...Beauty is truth, truth beauty, that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.

Step one: read the paradox in the first passage. Unheard melodies are sweeter than heard ones. The claim is that an imagined perfection beats an actual performance, because nothing can disappoint it.

Step two: notice the synaesthesia. "Ditties of no tone" piped "to the spirit". Music without sound, received by something that has no ears. Keats routinely crosses the senses, and here he removes one entirely.

Step three: read the second passage as consolation. The lover on the urn will never reach the kiss. Keats tells him not to grieve, because she will never age and he will never stop loving.

Step four: test the consolation. It works only if the lover is not there to experience the waiting. "For ever wilt thou love" is a promise and a sentence, and the poem keeps saying "never" in the middle of reassuring him.

Step five: count the negatives. Never, never, cannot, not, never. The consoling stanza is built almost entirely from denials, so the syntax undercuts the comfort the content offers.

Step six: read "Cold Pastoral". Two words, and the poem's attitude reverses. The urn has been addressed with increasing intimacy for four stanzas and is now called cold, which is what marble is, and what the frozen lovers are.

Step seven: address the final lines. Who says "Beauty is truth"? The urn, on most readings, with the last line and a half either continuing its speech or answering it. The punctuation in the surviving printings differs, and the ambiguity is not resolvable.

Step eight: state the position worth taking. The urn's statement is the wisdom available to an object with no experience of loss. The poem has spent five stanzas showing what permanence costs, so the closing maxim is something the speaker has been offered rather than something he has concluded.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Define an ode.
    Show the full solution

    A long lyric addressed to a subject, in an elevated register

  2. When did Keats write the great odes?
    Show the full solution

    Spring 1819

  3. Define negative capability.
    Show the full solution

    Remaining in uncertainty without any irritable reaching after fact and reason

  4. What is synaesthesia?
    Show the full solution

    Describing one sense in the terms of another

  5. What two words reverse the poem's attitude to the urn?
    Show the full solution

    Cold Pastoral

  6. Explain the claim about unheard melodies.
    Show the full solution

    An imagined perfection beats an actual performance because nothing can disappoint it. A melody never played cannot be played badly, cannot end, and cannot fail to match what the listener wanted. The paradox states the poem's whole problem in two lines: what is never realized is never spoiled, and also never happens. What is never performed can never disappoint

  7. Test the consolation offered to the Bold Lover.
    Show the full solution

    It works only if the lover is not there to experience the waiting. "For ever wilt thou love" is simultaneously a promise and a sentence, and if the figure has any interior at all then eternal near-approach is a torment rather than a gift. The consolation requires the thing being consoled to be incapable of feeling it. It only helps if he cannot experience the waiting

  8. What does counting the negatives reveal?
    Show the full solution

    Never, never, cannot, not, never: the consoling stanza is built almost entirely from denials. The syntax undercuts the comfort the content offers, so a reader hearing the stanza receives reassurance and refusal at the same time. Keats's form is arguing against his own speaker. The comforting stanza is made of denials

  9. What does "Cold Pastoral" do?
    Show the full solution

    It reverses four stanzas of increasing intimacy in two words. The urn has been addressed as a bride, a foster-child and a historian, and is now called cold, which is what marble is and what the frozen lovers are. The poem turns on its own object at the moment it has run out of ways to admire it. It withdraws, naming the urn by its actual temperature

  10. State a defensible position on the final lines.
    Show the full solution

    That the urn's statement is the wisdom available to an object with no experience of loss. Who speaks the last line and a half is genuinely unresolvable, since the punctuation differs across the surviving printings. But the poem has spent five stanzas showing what permanence costs, so the maxim is something the speaker has been offered rather than something he has concluded. It is the urn's wisdom, offered to a speaker who knows better

Lesson 3.9 · Unit 3 · RL.11-12.6, RI.11-12.6

The political Romantics

Romanticism is often taught as a retreat into nature and feeling. Shelley and Byron were political radicals who wrote about massacres and tyrants, and reading them corrects the impression that the movement had nothing to say about power.

The key ideas
  1. The second generation of Romantics is Byron, Shelley and Keats, all dead before 1825.
  2. Percy Bysshe Shelley wrote A Defence of Poetry in 1821, published 1840.
  3. Its closing claim is that poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world.
  4. The Mask of Anarchy was written after the Peterloo massacre of 1819 and not published until 1832.
  5. Ozymandias, 1818, is a sonnet about a ruined statue and the failure of political boasts.
  6. Byron created the Byronic hero, proud, guilty, isolated and attractive, in Childe Harold and after.
  7. Don Juan, from 1819, is a comic epic in ottava rima that mocks Romantic solemnity, including his own.
  8. Byron died at Missolonghi in 1824, having gone to support the Greek war of independence.

Where students lose marks: assuming Romantic means apolitical. Shelley's most famous sonnet is about the collapse of a tyranny and his longest poem of 1819 is about a massacre by cavalry on an English crowd.

Worked example

The texts. Percy Bysshe Shelley, "Ozymandias", 1818, and The Mask of Anarchy, written 1819. Both public domain.

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert... Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies...
And on the pedestal these words appear:
'My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!'
Nothing beside remains.

Rise, like lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number!
Shake your chains to earth like dew
Which in sleep had fallen on you:
Ye are many, they are few.

Step one: count the layers of narration in the sonnet. Shelley reports a traveler who describes a sculptor's work which bears a king's words. Four removes between the reader and Ozymandias.

Step two: state what the distance argues. The king's voice survives only as a quotation inside a stranger's anecdote. The structure of the poem is the demonstration: power reaches the present as hearsay.

Step three: read the inscription against its setting. "Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair" was a boast about scale. In an empty desert it becomes accurate for the opposite reason, and the poem never has to say so.

Step four: notice who is praised. The sculptor, whose hand "mocked" the passions and whose reading of the king's face survives. The only thing that lasted is the artist's judgment of the tyrant.

Step five: connect that to A Defence of Poetry. Poets as unacknowledged legislators is the same claim made in prose: the sculptor legislated Ozymandias's reputation for three thousand years, and the king did not get a say.

Step six: turn to the meter of The Mask of Anarchy. Short trochaic lines with insistent rhyme, close to a marching chant. The poem is built to be shouted by a crowd, which is a formal decision about audience.

Step seven: analyze "shake your chains to earth like dew". Chains are heavy and dew is weightless. The simile asserts that the restraint is lighter than it feels, which is exactly what a crowd needs to believe before it acts.

Step eight: read the last line. "Ye are many, they are few." Five monosyllables, a plain arithmetical fact, offered as a political argument. It is the simplest line in the unit and it was still being quoted at demonstrations two centuries later.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Who are the second generation of Romantics?
    Show the full solution

    Byron, Shelley and Keats

  2. What does Shelley call poets?
    Show the full solution

    The unacknowledged legislators of the world

  3. What occasioned The Mask of Anarchy?
    Show the full solution

    The Peterloo massacre of 1819

  4. Describe the Byronic hero.
    Show the full solution

    Proud, guilty, isolated and attractive

  5. Where and when did Byron die?
    Show the full solution

    Missolonghi, 1824, supporting Greek independence

  6. What does the narrative distance in "Ozymandias" argue?
    Show the full solution

    Shelley reports a traveler who describes a sculptor's work bearing a king's words: four removes between the reader and Ozymandias. The king's voice survives only as a quotation inside a stranger's anecdote, so the poem's structure demonstrates its claim. Power reaches the present as hearsay. Power survives only as hearsay at four removes

  7. How does the setting change the inscription's meaning?
    Show the full solution

    "Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair" was a boast about scale, addressed to rival kings. Standing in an empty desert beside a shattered face, it becomes accurate for the opposite reason: any mighty reader should indeed despair, at the prospect of their own works. The poem never states the reversal. It stays true and its reason inverts

  8. Who is the poem's real subject?
    Show the full solution

    The sculptor. His hand mocked the passions and his reading of the king's face is the only thing that survived, so the artist legislated the tyrant's reputation for three thousand years and the tyrant got no say. That is A Defence of Poetry's claim about unacknowledged legislators, demonstrated in fourteen lines. The sculptor, whose judgment outlasted the king

  9. What does the meter of The Mask of Anarchy decide?
    Show the full solution

    Its audience. Short trochaic lines with insistent rhyme are close to a marching chant, so the poem is built to be shouted by a crowd rather than read in a study. That is a formal decision with a political purpose, and it explains why the poem was not published until 1832. It is written to be chanted by a crowd

  10. Analyze "shake your chains to earth like dew" and the last line.
    Show the full solution

    Chains are heavy and dew is weightless, so the simile asserts the restraint is lighter than it feels, which is what a crowd must believe before it acts. The closing line, "Ye are many, they are few", is five monosyllables stating a plain arithmetical fact as a political argument, and it was still being quoted at demonstrations two centuries later. It makes the restraint weightless, then states a fact as an argument

Unit 3 review · Enlightenment and Romanticism

Ten questions across the whole unit

Questions 1 to 5 check that you hold the terms. Questions 6 to 10 require you to reason across the nine lessons.

  1. Define the heroic couplet.
    Show the full solution

    Two rhymed, usually end-stopped lines of iambic pentameter

  2. Define a mock epic and bathos.
    Show the full solution

    Epic conventions applied to a trivial subject; the drop from the elevated to the trivial

  3. Give the full definition of poetry from the Lyrical Ballads preface.
    Show the full solution

    The spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings, taking its origin from emotion recollected in tranquillity

  4. Quote Coleridge's phrase for poetic faith.
    Show the full solution

    Willing suspension of disbelief for the moment

  5. Define negative capability.
    Show the full solution

    Remaining in uncertainty without any irritable reaching after fact and reason

  6. Why did the Romantics abandon the heroic couplet?
    Show the full solution

    Because a form designed to make statements feel finished is the wrong instrument for a poetry about process, doubt and feeling. The couplet does not merely carry neoclassical values of order and proportion; it performs them, so keeping the form would have meant keeping the argument. Closure is the wrong effect for a poetry of process

  7. Why is the full Wordsworth definition almost the opposite of the half-quotation?
    Show the full solution

    The half-quotation suggests writing while in the grip of a feeling. The full definition has four stages: feel powerfully, recollect in tranquillity, contemplate the memory until the tranquillity disappears, and write while an emotion kindred to the original is present. It describes a deliberate process with a waiting period, and "kindred" concedes the composing emotion is not the original one. It describes a deliberate, staged process with a wait in it

  8. How does The Ancient Mariner earn its supernatural events?
    Show the full solution

    By supplying verifiable physical suffering first: thirst, shrinking boards, a punishing sun, a sea that cannot be drunk. That is the "semblance of truth sufficient" Coleridge's own theory demands, and a reader who has accepted the thirst will extend poetic faith to the ghost ship. The ballad stanza adds the authority of folk memory. Real physical detail buys credit for the impossible

  9. Explain what Blake means by contrary states.
    Show the full solution

    Not that one is right. The Innocence sweeper cannot see the exploitation and can genuinely comfort his friend; the Experience sweeper sees the system exactly and can comfort nobody. Each has what the other lacks, and Blake wrote that without contraries there is no progression, so the two books are two complete accounts a mind needs both of. Two complete accounts, each seeing what the other cannot

  10. Why is Shelley's sculptor the real subject of "Ozymandias"?
    Show the full solution

    His hand mocked the passions and his reading of the king's face is the only thing that survived, so the artist legislated the tyrant's reputation for three thousand years and the tyrant got no say. That demonstrates in fourteen lines the claim A Defence of Poetry makes in prose, that poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world. His judgment outlasted the king, which is the Defence's claim

Lesson 4.1 · Unit 4 · RI.11-12.6, RL.11-12.9

What the Victorians inherited, and what moved under them

The Victorian period is the longest and most productive in English literature, and it is usually caricatured. The writers were not complacent. They were the first generation of English writers to lose their cosmology while still having to publish weekly.

The key ideas
  1. The period runs from 1837 to 1901, Victoria's reign.
  2. Industrialization moved the population into cities, and by 1851 more people in England lived in towns than in the country.
  3. Geology came first, not biology, and Lyell's Principles of Geology, 1830 to 1833, had already extended the age of the earth.
  4. Darwin's On the Origin of Species appeared in 1859, into an argument already in progress.
  5. The higher criticism applied historical scholarship to the Bible, with Strauss's Life of Jesus translated by George Eliot in 1846.
  6. Literacy and cheap printing created a mass readership and the serialized novel.
  7. The Reform Acts of 1832, 1867 and 1884 widened the franchise in stages.
  8. The characteristic Victorian tone is public confidence with private doubt inside it.

Where students lose marks: dating Victorian doubt from 1859. Tennyson wrote the most anxious lines about extinction in the 1840s, more than a decade before Darwin published.

Worked example

The texts. Alfred Tennyson, In Memoriam A.H.H., published 1850, written from 1833; Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, 1859. Both public domain.

Are God and Nature then at strife,
That Nature lends such evil dreams?
So careful of the type she seems,
So careless of the single life.

'So careful of the type?' but no.
From scarped cliff and quarried stone
She cries, 'A thousand types are gone:
I care for nothing, all shall go.'

Tennyson

There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one... from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.

Darwin

Step one: date Tennyson's stanzas. In Memoriam was published in 1850 and written across seventeen years from 1833. These lines precede the Origin by at least nine years.

Step two: identify Tennyson's source. "From scarped cliff and quarried stone." Geology, not biology. The fossil record read by Lyell's methods had already established that most species that ever existed are extinct.

Step three: read the two-stage argument. The first stanza consoles: nature discards individuals but preserves the type. The second removes the consolation, because the rocks say a thousand types are gone.

Step four: notice who speaks. Nature is given a voice and says "I care for nothing, all shall go." The most desolate line in Victorian poetry is a quotation, placed in the mouth of a personified force.

Step five: state what the personification achieves. Nature is granted a capacity for caring in the same sentence that denies she exercises it, which is the same move Crane would make in "The Open Boat" forty years later.

Step six: read Darwin's sentence for its register. "Grandeur", "breathed", "most beautiful and most wonderful". A scientific conclusion is presented in the vocabulary of the psalms, and the passive "breathed" leaves room for a creator without requiring one.

Step seven: state what Darwin is doing rhetorically. Answering an objection he expects. A reader who fears the theory removes meaning is told at the last possible moment that the view contains grandeur, and the placement at the book's final paragraph is deliberate.

Step eight: state the period's characteristic shape. A confident public surface with a specific anxiety underneath, in both writers and in both directions. Tennyson's faith poem contains the century's bleakest stanza and Darwin's materialist book ends with a doxology.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. What years does the Victorian period cover?
    Show the full solution

    1837 to 1901

  2. What did Lyell publish, and when?
    Show the full solution

    Principles of Geology, 1830 to 1833

  3. When did the Origin of Species appear?
    Show the full solution

    1859

  4. What is the higher criticism?
    Show the full solution

    Historical scholarship applied to the Bible

  5. Name the three Reform Acts by date.
    Show the full solution

    1832, 1867 and 1884

  6. Why does the dating of In Memoriam matter?
    Show the full solution

    Because it shows Victorian doubt predates Darwin. The poem was written from 1833 and published in 1850, at least nine years before the Origin, and its source is geology rather than biology: "from scarped cliff and quarried stone". The fossil record had already established mass extinction before any theory explained it. Doubt arrived with geology, before Darwin

  7. Describe the two-stage argument in Tennyson's stanzas.
    Show the full solution

    The first consoles: nature discards individuals but preserves the type, so loss has a purpose. The second withdraws the consolation, because the rocks testify that a thousand types are gone. Tennyson offers the available comfort and then destroys it with evidence, in eight lines. Consolation offered, then removed by the fossil record

  8. What does personifying Nature achieve?
    Show the full solution

    It grants her the capacity for caring in the same sentence that denies she exercises it. "I care for nothing" is only devastating if the speaker could have cared, so the personification supplies the indifference with something to be indifferent about. Crane makes the same move in "The Open Boat" forty years later. Indifference needs a capacity for care to be felt

  9. Analyze the register of Darwin's final sentence.
    Show the full solution

    "Grandeur", "breathed", "most beautiful and most wonderful": a scientific conclusion presented in the vocabulary of the psalms. The passive "breathed" leaves room for a creator without requiring one, and the whole sentence answers an objection Darwin expects, at the last possible moment in the book. Biblical vocabulary answering an anticipated objection

  10. State the period's characteristic shape.
    Show the full solution

    A confident public surface with a specific anxiety beneath it, working in both directions. Tennyson's great poem of faith contains the century's bleakest stanza, and Darwin's materialist book ends with something close to a doxology. Neither writer is simply what their reputation says. Public confidence with private doubt, in both directions

Lesson 4.2 · Unit 4 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.2

In Memoriam, Ulysses, and doubt in public

Tennyson was Poet Laureate for forty-two years and the most publicly successful poet England has produced. He was also grieving one friend for the whole of it, and the tension between the official voice and the private one is his subject.

The key ideas
  1. Arthur Henry Hallam died in 1833 at twenty-two, and Tennyson wrote about it for seventeen years.
  2. In Memoriam is 133 sections in a stanza Tennyson devised, ABBA in iambic tetrameter.
  3. That rhyme scheme encloses, because the outer rhyme closes over the inner pair.
  4. Ulysses was written in 1833 and published in 1842, in blank verse.
  5. The dramatic monologue is the form Ulysses approaches, and Browning would perfect it.
  6. Tennyson became Laureate in 1850, the year In Memoriam was published.
  7. His technical control of sound is unmatched, particularly his use of vowel length to slow a line.
  8. The public poems and the private ones often say opposite things about the same questions.

Where students lose marks: reading Ulysses as straightforward inspiration. The speaker is a king who is abandoning his kingdom, his wife and his subjects to go sailing, and he says so.

Worked example

The texts. Alfred Tennyson, "Ulysses", 1842, and In Memoriam A.H.H., 1850. Both public domain.

It little profits that an idle king,
By this still hearth, among these barren crags,
Match'd with an aged wife, I mete and dole
Unequal laws unto a savage race,
That hoard, and sleep, and feed, and know not me.

...Come, my friends,
'Tis not too late to seek a newer world.
...To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.

In Memoriam

Step one: read the opening of Ulysses honestly. He calls his wife aged, his subjects savage, and his laws unequal. Three insults in three lines, delivered by the man responsible for all three things.

Step two: state what that establishes. The speaker's dissatisfaction is with his own duties, and the poem's famous energy is a king's argument for leaving his post.

Step three: notice the verbs describing his people. "Hoard, and sleep, and feed." Three monosyllabic verbs of animal maintenance, and the list's flatness is the contempt.

Step four: read the last line as sound. "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." Four stresses separated by commas, each infinitive a separate push. The line is built to be quoted, and it has been, on war memorials and in speeches, for a century and a half.

Step five: hold both readings. The line is genuinely stirring and it is the conclusion of a speech by a man abandoning his obligations. Tennyson wrote it within weeks of Hallam's death, as a poem about continuing, and the poem's ambivalence is the record of what continuing costs.

Step six: turn to the In Memoriam stanza. ABBA in tetrameter. The outer rhyme closes over the inner pair, so each stanza shuts, and a poem in 133 of them shuts 133 times without concluding.

Step seven: read the famous claim carefully. "I hold it true", "I feel it, when I sorrow most". He does not say it is true; he says he holds it, and specifically at the worst moments. The consolation is reported as a practice rather than stated as a fact.

Step eight: state what the poems share. A public sentence that can be quoted alone and a context that complicates it. Both "not to yield" and "better to have loved and lost" are inscriptions with arguments attached, and reading the argument is what separates study from quotation.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Who was Arthur Hallam, and when did he die?
    Show the full solution

    Tennyson's friend, dead in 1833 at twenty-two

  2. Describe the In Memoriam stanza.
    Show the full solution

    ABBA in iambic tetrameter

  3. How many sections does the poem have?
    Show the full solution

    133

  4. When was Ulysses written and published?
    Show the full solution

    Written 1833, published 1842

  5. When did Tennyson become Laureate?
    Show the full solution

    1850

  6. What does the opening of Ulysses establish about the speaker?
    Show the full solution

    He calls his wife aged, his subjects savage and his own laws unequal, which is three insults in three lines delivered by the man responsible for all three. His dissatisfaction is with his own duties, so the poem's famous energy is a king's argument for abandoning his post. He is contemptuous of the obligations he is leaving

  7. Analyze "hoard, and sleep, and feed".
    Show the full solution

    Three monosyllabic verbs of animal maintenance, listed flatly with no differentiation. The contempt is in the flatness rather than in any adjective: Ulysses describes his people's entire existence in six syllables, and the shortness is the judgment. Three flat monosyllables reduce a people to maintenance

  8. Hold both readings of the last line.
    Show the full solution

    "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield" is genuinely stirring, built from four separate infinitive pushes, and it has been quoted on war memorials for a century and a half. It is also the conclusion of a speech by a man abandoning his wife, his son and his kingdom. Tennyson wrote it within weeks of Hallam's death as a poem about continuing, and the ambivalence records what continuing costs. Inspiring, and spoken by someone deserting his post

  9. What does the ABBA stanza do across 133 sections?
    Show the full solution

    The outer rhyme closes over the inner pair, so each stanza shuts. A poem made of 133 sections of shutting stanzas closes over and over without ever concluding, which is an exact formal image of grief that keeps completing a thought and finding another one waiting. It closes repeatedly without ever concluding

  10. Read "'Tis better to have loved and lost" in its stanza.
    Show the full solution

    Tennyson does not say it is true. He says "I hold it true" and that he feels it "when I sorrow most", so the consolation is reported as a practice maintained under pressure rather than stated as a fact established. Quoted alone the line is a platitude; in its stanza it is a man describing what he makes himself believe. He reports holding it, not that it is true

Lesson 4.3 · Unit 4 · RL.11-12.6, RL.11-12.5

The dramatic monologue and My Last Duchess

Browning invented the form that gives a reader everything through a single speaker who does not know what he is revealing. It is the nineteenth century's most useful technical contribution, and modernism could not have happened without it.

The key ideas
  1. A dramatic monologue has one speaker who is not the poet.
  2. There is a silent listener whose presence and reactions can be inferred from what the speaker says.
  3. It occurs at a specific moment in a situation the reader must reconstruct.
  4. The speaker reveals more than he intends, which is the form's engine.
  5. "My Last Duchess" was published in 1842 in Dramatic Lyrics.
  6. It is in rhymed couplets that are so heavily enjambed the rhyme is almost inaudible.
  7. The speaker is a Renaissance duke negotiating a second marriage with an envoy.
  8. The last duchess is dead, and the duke says enough to establish that he ordered it.

Where students lose marks: forgetting the listener. Every line is addressed to an envoy arranging the duke's next marriage, and the poem is a negotiation, which changes what the boasting is for.

Worked example

The text. Robert Browning, "My Last Duchess", 1842. Public domain.

That's my last Duchess painted on the wall,
Looking as if she were alive. I call
That piece a wonder, now: Fra Pandolf's hands
Worked busily a day, and there she stands.

She thanked men,—good! but thanked
Somehow—I know not how—as if she ranked
My gift of a nine-hundred-years-old name
With anybody's gift.
...I gave commands;
Then all smiles stopped together.

Notice Neptune, though,
Taming a sea-horse, thought a rarity,
Which Claus of Innsbruck cast in bronze for me!

Step one: establish the situation from the first line. A man is showing a portrait of his previous wife to a visitor, and the portrait is behind a curtain only he draws. The poem never states any of this directly.

Step two: identify the listener. An envoy from a count whose daughter the duke intends to marry. The reader learns this three-quarters of the way through, which retrospectively changes everything already said.

Step three: read the complaint. She thanked men, and she ranked his nine-hundred-year-old name with anybody's gift. His grievance is that she was equally pleased by a compliment and by a dynasty.

Step four: notice what that reveals about him. He expected gratitude proportional to rank, and he could not say so. He explains at length that he chose never to stoop to telling her, which is the poem's key admission.

Step five: work "I gave commands; then all smiles stopped together." Nine words. No verb of killing, no object, and the euphemism is complete. The reader supplies the murder from the syntax.

Step six: state why the euphemism is more damning. A confession would make him a murderer. The refusal to name the act makes him a man for whom having a wife killed is not the sort of thing one specifies, which is worse.

Step seven: read the final lines. He points out a bronze of Neptune taming a sea-horse, cast for him. Another artwork, another male figure controlling a female creature, mentioned casually on the way downstairs.

Step eight: state what the form accomplishes. Nothing is narrated and everything is established. The duke is the only source, he is trying to impress, and the reader assembles a murder from a man attempting to appear reasonable to a marriage broker.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Name the four features of a dramatic monologue.
    Show the full solution

    One speaker who is not the poet, a silent listener, a specific moment, unintended revelation

  2. When was the poem published?
    Show the full solution

    1842, in Dramatic Lyrics

  3. Who is the listener?
    Show the full solution

    An envoy negotiating the duke's next marriage

  4. What is the duke's stated complaint?
    Show the full solution

    That she ranked his nine-hundred-year-old name with anybody's gift

  5. What is the last object he points out?
    Show the full solution

    A bronze of Neptune taming a sea-horse

  6. How does the poem establish its situation without narration?
    Show the full solution

    Entirely through what the duke says and what he assumes his listener already knows. A portrait, a curtain only he draws, a previous wife, a visitor being shown around: none of it is stated and all of it is inferable. The reader reconstructs a scene from one side of a conversation. The reader reconstructs it from one side of a conversation

  7. Why does learning the listener's identity late change the poem?
    Show the full solution

    Because it retroactively converts reminiscence into negotiation. Everything already said was addressed to a man arranging the duke's next marriage, so the account of the last wife's faults is a specification of what the next one should avoid. The boasting is a warning. It turns reminiscence into a warning about the next wife

  8. What does the duke's refusal to "stoop" reveal?
    Show the full solution

    That he expected gratitude proportional to rank and could not bring himself to say so. He explains at length that telling her would have been beneath him, which means he killed a woman rather than have a conversation. The admission is offered as evidence of his dignity. He killed her rather than explain himself

  9. Why is the euphemism more damning than a confession?
    Show the full solution

    A confession would make him a murderer. "I gave commands; then all smiles stopped together" contains no verb of killing and no object, which makes him a man for whom having a wife killed is not the sort of thing one specifies. The casualness establishes something worse than the act. It shows the act is beneath his notice

  10. What does the closing bronze add?
    Show the full solution

    Another artwork, another male figure controlling a female creature, mentioned casually on the way downstairs and named as cast for him. The poem ends by showing that the duchess behind the curtain was one item in a collection, and that the duke has learned nothing and is about to acquire another wife. It repeats the pattern and shows nothing has changed

Lesson 4.4 · Unit 4 · RL.11-12.6, RL.11-12.3

Porphyria's Lover, and the speaker who convicts himself

If My Last Duchess shows a man concealing a murder, Porphyria's Lover shows one explaining a murder he believes was correct. The second is the harder poem, because the speaker's reasoning is available in full and it does not stop.

The key ideas
  1. The poem was published in 1836, originally under the title "Porphyria".
  2. It appeared with "Johannes Agricola in Meditation" under the heading Madhouse Cells.
  3. The speaker strangles Porphyria with her own hair and then sits with the body all night.
  4. He believes she wanted it, and the poem gives his reasoning in full.
  5. The rhyme scheme is ABABB, which leaves an extra unmatched line in every stanza.
  6. The storm in the opening is described in the same voice as the murder, with no change of register.
  7. The last line reports God's silence, which the speaker reads as approval.
  8. The reader's only access is the speaker, and there is no correcting voice anywhere.

Where students lose marks: writing that the speaker is mad and stopping. Madness is a label, not an analysis. Trace the argument he actually makes and show where it is internally consistent, because that is what makes the poem frightening.

Worked example

The text. Robert Browning, "Porphyria's Lover", 1836. Public domain.

The rain set early in tonight,
The sullen wind was soon awake,
It tore the elm-tops down for spite,
And did its worst to vex the lake:
I listened with heart fit to break.

That moment she was mine, mine, fair,
Perfectly pure and good: I found
A thing to do, and all her hair
In one long yellow string I wound
Three times her little throat around,
And strangled her. No pain felt she;
I am quite sure she felt no pain.

And thus we sit together now,
And all night long we have not stirred,
And yet God has not said a word!

Step one: read the opening for what it attributes to the weather. The wind is sullen, it acts "for spite", and it does "its worst to vex". Motive, malice and intent, assigned to a storm.

Step two: state what that establishes about the speaker. Before anything happens, the reader has learned that this narrator reads intention into things that have none. Everything he later says about Porphyria's wishes arrives with that established.

Step three: notice the rhyme scheme. ABABB. Four lines pair off and a fifth is left over, matching only by repetition. Every stanza in the poem contains an extra thing that does not belong, which is a very quiet piece of design.

Step four: read "I found a thing to do". Not decided, not resolved. "Found" presents the murder as a discovery, something already available that he located, which removes agency from the sentence describing the most deliberate act in the poem.

Step five: work the repetition about pain. "No pain felt she; I am quite sure she felt no pain." He says it twice, and the second time he insists on his own certainty. A man who was certain would not need the second clause.

Step six: state where the doubt is. Only there. It is the single place in the poem where the speaker's confidence cracks, and he repairs it immediately by adding emphasis rather than evidence.

Step seven: read the last line. "And yet God has not said a word!" He has waited all night for a response and treats the absence as endorsement. The exclamation mark is triumph.

Step eight: state why the poem is worse than a madness diagnosis allows. The reasoning is internally consistent throughout: she wanted to be his, she could not be permanently, he made her permanently, and heaven did not object. Every step follows from the last, and the only false step is the first, which is the premise a reader of any romantic poetry has been trained to accept.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was the poem published?
    Show the full solution

    1836

  2. Under what heading did it appear?
    Show the full solution

    Madhouse Cells

  3. How does the speaker kill her?
    Show the full solution

    He strangles her with her own hair

  4. Give the rhyme scheme.
    Show the full solution

    ABABB

  5. What is the poem's last line?
    Show the full solution

    "And yet God has not said a word!"

  6. What does the opening establish before anything happens?
    Show the full solution

    That this narrator reads intention into things that have none. The wind is sullen, it tears elm-tops "for spite", and it does "its worst to vex" the lake: motive, malice and purpose assigned to weather. Everything he later says about Porphyria's wishes arrives with that habit already demonstrated. That he attributes intention to things that have none

  7. What does the ABABB scheme contribute?
    Show the full solution

    Four lines pair off and a fifth is left over, matching only by repetition, so every stanza contains an extra thing that does not belong. It is a very quiet piece of design, and it means the poem's form is always slightly unresolved while its speaker is entirely certain. Every stanza has a leftover line that does not pair

  8. Analyze "I found a thing to do".
    Show the full solution

    Not decided, not resolved: "found" presents the murder as a discovery, something already available that he happened to locate. The verb removes agency from the sentence describing the most deliberate act in the poem, which is exactly the grammatical move a person makes when they do not intend to own an action. "Found" turns a decision into a discovery

  9. Where is the only doubt in the poem, and how is it handled?
    Show the full solution

    "No pain felt she; I am quite sure she felt no pain." He says it twice and the second time insists on his own certainty, which a certain man would not need to do. It is the single place where his confidence cracks, and he repairs it by adding emphasis rather than evidence. The repeated claim about pain, patched with emphasis

  10. Why is "he is mad" an inadequate reading?
    Show the full solution

    Because madness is a label rather than an analysis, and the speaker's reasoning is internally consistent throughout: she wanted to be his, she could not be permanently, he made her permanently, and heaven did not object. Every step follows from the last. The only false step is the first, which is the premise that any romantic poetry trains a reader to accept. The reasoning is consistent; only the first premise is false

Lesson 4.5 · Unit 4 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.5

Dover Beach and the withdrawal of faith

Dover Beach is thirty-seven lines long and contains the clearest statement in English of what it felt like to lose a religion that the whole structure of a society still assumed. Its technique is a single sustained sound.

The key ideas
  1. Matthew Arnold wrote Dover Beach about 1851 and published it in 1867.
  2. He was a school inspector for thirty-five years and a critic as well as a poet.
  3. The poem is in irregular stanzas with irregular rhyme, closer to free verse than anything else in the period.
  4. The Sea of Faith is its central figure, and it is ebbing rather than gone.
  5. The poem moves through four scales: a view, a sound, a historical claim, and a personal plea.
  6. Sophocles is invoked as having heard the same sound on the Aegean.
  7. The last lines describe a darkling plain where ignorant armies clash by night.
  8. Arnold's criticism proposed culture as what might replace religion, which the poem does not promise.

Where students lose marks: treating the poem as simple despair. Its last movement is a request to one person, "let us be true to one another", which is a proposal rather than a surrender.

Worked example

The text. Matthew Arnold, "Dover Beach", published 1867. Public domain.

Listen! you hear the grating roar
Of pebbles which the waves draw back, and fling,
At their return, up the high strand,
Begin, and cease, and then again begin,
With tremulous cadence slow, and bring
The eternal note of sadness in.

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore
Lay like the bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar

Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams...
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light

Step one: notice what the poem begins with. A window, a calm sea, the French coast, moonlight. Six lines of settled beauty before anything is wrong.

Step two: read the instruction. "Listen!" The poem switches from sight to sound in one word, and everything that follows is heard rather than seen.

Step three: analyze the rhythm of "begin, and cease, and then again begin". Three phrases separated by commas, the last repeating the first. The line performs the wave's return, so a reader experiences the cycle rather than being told about it.

Step four: state what the pebbles supply. A grating roar, which is unpleasant and mechanical. Arnold picks the one sound the sea makes that is neither soothing nor grand, and builds the poem's thesis from it.

Step five: work the Sea of Faith figure. Faith is not gone but ebbing, and what the speaker hears is a "long, withdrawing roar". A tide goes out audibly and over hours, so the metaphor makes the loss a process with a duration rather than an event.

Step six: notice the tide's other property. It returns. Arnold chose an image of cyclical withdrawal, which either offers a hope he does not develop or an irony he expects the reader to catch, and both readings are defensible.

Step seven: read the turn to the second person. "Ah, love, let us be true to one another." The poem shrinks from the history of belief to two people in a room, which is the only scale at which it offers anything.

Step eight: state the poem's proposal. If the world has neither joy nor love nor light nor certitude, then fidelity between two people is not consolation but construction: the only thing left that can be made rather than found. The darkling plain is the setting for that proposal, not a conclusion replacing it.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Dover Beach written and published?
    Show the full solution

    Written about 1851, published 1867

  2. What was Arnold's profession?
    Show the full solution

    A school inspector, for thirty-five years

  3. Who is invoked as having heard the same sound?
    Show the full solution

    Sophocles, on the Aegean

  4. What does the poem's last image describe?
    Show the full solution

    A darkling plain where ignorant armies clash by night

  5. What did Arnold's criticism propose as a replacement for religion?
    Show the full solution

    Culture

  6. What does the word "Listen!" accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    It switches the poem from sight to sound in one word. Six lines of settled visual beauty precede it, and everything after is heard rather than seen. The sense that delivers the poem's argument is the one the reader has to be instructed to use. It moves the poem from seeing to hearing

  7. Analyze "begin, and cease, and then again begin".
    Show the full solution

    Three phrases separated by commas, with the last repeating the first, so the line performs the wave's return rather than describing it. A reader experiences the cycle in the syntax, which is why the poem's argument about endless recurrence needs no statement at this point. The line enacts the cycle it describes

  8. Why is the grating roar of pebbles the right sound?
    Show the full solution

    Because it is the one noise the sea makes that is neither soothing nor grand. Arnold could have used the roll of surf or the boom of a storm and chose an unpleasant mechanical grinding, so the poem's central sensation is irritating rather than sublime. The thesis is built from the least poetic thing available. It is the sea's least consoling, least grand noise

  9. What does the tide metaphor offer that a simpler image would not?
    Show the full solution

    Duration, and possibly return. Faith is not gone but ebbing, with a "long, withdrawing roar", so the loss is a process with a length rather than an event. A tide also comes back, which is either a hope Arnold declines to develop or an irony he expects the reader to catch, and both readings hold. Loss as a long process, in an image that also returns

  10. State the poem's proposal rather than its despair.
    Show the full solution

    If the world has neither joy nor love nor light nor certitude, then fidelity between two people is not consolation but construction: the only thing left that can be made rather than found. The poem shrinks from the history of belief to two people in a room, and the darkling plain is the setting for that proposal rather than a conclusion replacing it. Fidelity as the one thing that can still be made

Lesson 4.6 · Unit 4 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.2

Irony without consolation

Hardy stopped writing novels in 1896 and wrote poetry for the next thirty years. The poems are the purest statement of a position the Victorians mostly hedged: that the universe is not hostile, is not benevolent, and does not know we are here.

The key ideas
  1. Thomas Hardy abandoned fiction after Jude the Obscure, 1895, was badly received.
  2. His poetry ran from 1898 to 1928, and the work before 1931 is public domain in the United States.
  3. Situational irony is his characteristic device: the outcome is the opposite of what the arrangement promised.
  4. He invented new stanza forms constantly, rarely using the same shape twice.
  5. His diction mixes dialect, coinage and plain speech, which Victorian critics found awkward.
  6. "The Convergence of the Twain", 1912, is about the Titanic and treats the collision as an appointment.
  7. "The Darkling Thrush" is dated 31 December 1900, the last day of the century.
  8. He refused both consolation and despair, and called his position evolutionary meliorism.

Where students lose marks: calling Hardy a pessimist and stopping. He objected to the label. Show the structure: he sets up an expectation the reader shares, and then reports what actually happened.

Worked example

The texts. Thomas Hardy, "The Convergence of the Twain", 1912, and "The Darkling Thrush", 1900. Both public domain.

And as the smart ship grew
In stature, grace, and hue,
In shadowy silent distance grew the Iceberg too.

Alien they seemed to be:
No mortal eye could see
The intimate welding of their later history

At once a voice arose among
The bleak twigs overhead
In a full-hearted evensong
Of joy illimited;
An aged thrush, frail, gaunt, and small,
In blast-beruffled plume,
Had chosen thus to fling his soul
Upon the growing gloom.

...Some blessed Hope, whereof he knew
And I was unaware.

Step one: read the stanza shape of the Titanic poem. Two short lines and one long one, rhyming AAA. The third line is roughly twice the length of the others, which makes each stanza widen suddenly at the end.

Step two: state what the shape suggests. The stanza is often read as the silhouette of a ship, and whether or not Hardy intended that, the repeated widening enacts the convergence the poem describes: two small things and then one large event.

Step three: work the parallel growth. The ship grew in stature, grace and hue; the iceberg grew too, in shadowy silent distance. Two processes running at the same time in different places, with the same verb.

Step four: read "the intimate welding of their later history". Welding is a shipyard word, so the collision is described in the vocabulary of the ship's own construction. The disaster is presented as a completion rather than an accident.

Step five: state what Hardy has done to the event. He has removed contingency. Nothing in the poem suggests the iceberg could have been avoided, and the two objects are described as being prepared for each other, which is the situational irony at its coldest.

Step six: turn to the thrush. A frail, gaunt, small, wind-battered old bird sings joyfully at the end of a century on a freezing evening. Hardy specifies its condition in four adjectives before it makes a sound.

Step seven: read the last two lines precisely. "Some blessed Hope, whereof he knew / And I was unaware." The hope belongs to the bird, the speaker does not have it, and "some" concedes he cannot identify it. Three qualifications in fourteen words.

Step eight: state Hardy's actual position. Not despair. He reports a hope he does not share and cannot name, held by something less equipped than he is, and he declines to either claim it or deny it. That refusal to settle is what he meant by refusing the label of pessimist.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Why did Hardy stop writing novels?
    Show the full solution

    Jude the Obscure, 1895, was badly received

  2. Define situational irony.
    Show the full solution

    The outcome is the opposite of what the arrangement promised

  3. What is "The Convergence of the Twain" about?
    Show the full solution

    The sinking of the Titanic, 1912

  4. What is the date of "The Darkling Thrush"?
    Show the full solution

    31 December 1900

  5. What did Hardy call his position?
    Show the full solution

    Evolutionary meliorism

  6. What does the stanza shape of the Titanic poem do?
    Show the full solution

    Two short lines and one roughly twice as long, rhyming AAA, so each stanza widens suddenly at the end. It is often read as the silhouette of a ship, and whether or not Hardy intended that, the repeated widening enacts the convergence: two small things and then one large event, thirty-three times. It widens at each stanza's end, enacting the collision

  7. Analyze "the intimate welding of their later history".
    Show the full solution

    Welding is a shipyard word, so the collision is described in the vocabulary of the ship's own construction, and "intimate" makes it a union rather than an impact. The disaster is presented as a completion of a process begun in the yards, which removes the accident from the account entirely. Shipyard vocabulary makes the wreck a completion

  8. What has Hardy removed from the event?
    Show the full solution

    Contingency. Nothing in the poem suggests the iceberg could have been avoided, and the two objects are described growing in parallel, prepared for each other, with the same verb. There is no moment at which anything could have gone differently, which is situational irony at its coldest. Any possibility that it could have gone otherwise

  9. Why does Hardy specify the thrush's condition before it sings?
    Show the full solution

    Frail, gaunt, small and blast-beruffled: four descriptors establishing that this bird has the least reason of anything in the poem to be hopeful. The joy is then unaccountable rather than natural, which is the whole point. A healthy bird singing would be weather; this one is a problem. So the joy is unaccountable rather than natural

  10. Read the last two lines precisely, and state Hardy's position.
    Show the full solution

    "Some blessed Hope, whereof he knew / And I was unaware": the hope belongs to the bird, the speaker does not have it, and "some" concedes he cannot identify it. Three qualifications in fourteen words. He reports a hope he does not share and cannot name, held by something less equipped than he is, and declines to claim or deny it. That refusal is why he rejected the label of pessimist. He reports a hope he neither shares nor denies

Lesson 4.7 · Unit 4 · RL.11-12.5, RI.11-12.7

Serialization and the shape it gives a novel

Victorian novels are long, full of subplots, and end their chapters on hooks, and all three are consequences of how they were sold. The publishing format is not background information; it determined the form.

The key ideas
  1. Most Victorian novels appeared in parts, monthly in shilling numbers or weekly in magazines.
  2. Pickwick Papers, 1836, established the monthly format and made Dickens famous at twenty-four.
  3. A monthly number was thirty-two pages, which fixed the length of each installment tightly.
  4. Each installment needs its own shape, with a beginning, a development and a hook.
  5. Subplots keep a large cast circulating, so no thread goes cold across a month.
  6. Authors could respond to sales and to letters, so a popular character might be given more to do.
  7. Recapitulation is built in, which is why Victorian novels restate things a modern reader has just read.
  8. The three-volume novel was the other format, sold to circulating libraries rather than to readers.

Where students lose marks: calling Victorian novels padded. Show what the format required, then show how a particular writer used the constraint, which is the difference between a complaint and an analysis.

Worked example

The texts. Charles Dickens, Bleak House, serialized 1852 to 1853, and Hard Times, serialized weekly in 1854. Both public domain.

Fog everywhere. Fog up the river, where it flows among green aits and meadows; fog down the river, where it rolls defiled among the tiers of shipping and the waterside pollutions of a great (and dirty) city... Chance people on the bridges peeping over the parapets into a nether sky of fog, with fog all round them, as if they were up in a balloon, and hanging in the misty clouds.

Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life.

Hard Times

Step one: count the repetitions. "Fog" appears thirteen times in the opening of Bleak House. No verb governs most of the sentences, which are fragments rather than statements.

Step two: state what the repetition does for a serial reader. It establishes an atmosphere that will persist for nineteen months. A reader picking up number eight in October remembers the fog, and the novel's central image has been installed so firmly it needs no reintroduction.

Step three: state what the fog becomes. The Court of Chancery, whose delays the novel is about. The physical fog is introduced for two pages before the legal one is named, so the metaphor is established before it is applied.

Step four: turn to the weekly format. Hard Times ran weekly, which gives far less room than a monthly number, and it is by some distance Dickens's shortest novel. The form followed the schedule.

Step five: read Gradgrind's opening speech. "Facts" three times in three sentences, capitalized. A weekly serial cannot afford gradual characterization, so the character arrives complete in twenty words.

Step six: state the trade-off. Speed buys clarity and costs subtlety. Gradgrind is legible instantly and is less complex than a character developed over nineteen months would be, and that is a consequence of the publication schedule rather than a failure of skill.

Step seven: identify the installment hook. Each part ends on a question, an arrival or a revelation, because the reader must buy the next one. That requirement shapes the plot at the level of the month.

Step eight: state the analytical move. Name the format, name what it required, and then show the specific technique the writer developed in response. That structure turns a fact about publishing into an argument about form.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. What two serial formats were used?
    Show the full solution

    Monthly shilling numbers and weekly magazine parts

  2. How long was a monthly number?
    Show the full solution

    Thirty-two pages

  3. Which novel established the monthly format?
    Show the full solution

    Pickwick Papers, 1836

  4. What was the three-volume novel sold to?
    Show the full solution

    Circulating libraries

  5. How many times does "fog" appear in the opening of Bleak House?
    Show the full solution

    Thirteen

  6. Why does serialization produce subplots?
    Show the full solution

    Because a large cast must keep circulating so no thread goes cold across a month. A reader waiting four weeks needs the characters they care about to appear, and a single plotline could not sustain nineteen installments. The multiplicity readers often call sprawl is a structural requirement of the format. A month between parts means no thread can go cold

  7. What does the fog repetition accomplish for a serial reader?
    Show the full solution

    It installs an atmosphere firmly enough to persist for nineteen months. A reader picking up number eight in October remembers the fog without being reminded, so the novel's central image needs no reintroduction. The repetition that looks excessive on a single page is calibrated for a two-year reading experience. It fixes the image for a reader returning monthly

  8. Why is the physical fog introduced before the legal one?
    Show the full solution

    So the metaphor is established before it is applied. Two pages of actual London fog precede any mention of the Court of Chancery, which means the reader already has the sensation of being unable to see when the novel names the institution that produces it. The vehicle arrives before the tenor. The sensation is installed before the institution is named

  9. What does weekly publication do to characterization?
    Show the full solution

    It forces speed. Hard Times ran weekly and is Dickens's shortest novel, and Gradgrind arrives complete in twenty words: "Facts" three times in three sentences, capitalized. Speed buys instant legibility and costs subtlety, and that trade is a consequence of the schedule rather than a failure of skill. Characters must arrive complete, which costs subtlety

  10. State the analytical move this lesson teaches.
    Show the full solution

    Name the format, name what it required, then show the specific technique the writer developed in response. That structure converts a fact about publishing into an argument about form, and it is the difference between complaining that Victorian novels are long and explaining why they are shaped as they are. Format, requirement, then the technique it produced

Lesson 4.8 · Unit 4 · RL.11-12.3, RL.11-12.6

Character as argument in Hard Times

Hard Times is the shortest of Dickens's novels and the most schematic, which makes it the best one for learning how he works. Every major character embodies a position, and the plot is the collision of those positions.

The key ideas
  1. Hard Times was serialized weekly in 1854 and is dedicated to Thomas Carlyle.
  2. Coketown is a composite industrial city, built of red brick blackened by smoke.
  3. Utilitarianism is the target, in a caricatured form Dickens took from the political economists.
  4. Gradgrind stands for fact, Sleary's circus for fancy, and the novel sets them against each other.
  5. The three books are titled Sowing, Reaping and Garnering, which announces the plot as a harvest.
  6. Names carry meaning: Gradgrind, Bounderby, M'Choakumchild, Sleary.
  7. Stephen Blackpool is the working-class character, and his treatment is the novel's weakest point.
  8. Dickens's method is repetition with variation, so a phrase attached to a character returns in changed circumstances.

Where students lose marks: defending the characters as realistic. They are not, and were not meant to be. Argue about whether the schematic method serves the argument, which is the question worth having.

Worked example

The text. Charles Dickens, Hard Times, 1854. Public domain.

It was a town of red brick, or of brick that would have been red if the smoke and ashes had allowed it; but as matters stood it was a town of unnatural red and black like the painted face of a savage. It was a town of machinery and tall chimneys, out of which interminable serpents of smoke trailed themselves for ever and ever, and never got uncoiled.

'Girl number twenty,' said Mr. Gradgrind, squarely pointing with his square forefinger, 'I don't know that girl. Who is that girl?'

Step one: read the correction in the first sentence. Red brick, then "or of brick that would have been red", then unnatural red and black. Dickens states a fact, withdraws it, and replaces it, in one sentence.

Step two: state what that syntax argues. The town's actual color cannot be stated directly, because industry has interposed itself between the object and its description. The sentence's self-correction is the pollution.

Step three: analyze the serpents. Smoke that "never got uncoiled" is unnatural motion: a snake that moves forever without ever completing anything. The image makes perpetual activity a form of stasis.

Step four: read the Gradgrind sentence for repetition. "Squarely pointing with his square forefinger." A word and its adverb in the same clause, which is clumsy deliberately. Gradgrind is composed of right angles and the prose is too.

Step five: work "girl number twenty". He addresses a child by her position in a register. Three words establish the entire critique of his educational philosophy, and the novel then spends a chapter confirming it.

Step six: state what "who is that girl" reveals. He does not know her name and asks in the third person while pointing at her. She is present and being discussed as absent, which is what treating people as data does.

Step seven: identify the method. Character as argument. Gradgrind is not a person who holds utilitarian views; he is the view, given a square finger and a numbering system, and Dickens never pretends otherwise.

Step eight: state the question worth arguing. Whether the schematic method serves the case. It makes the critique vivid and impossible to misunderstand, and it means Dickens is arguing against a caricature of utilitarianism rather than against Mill. Both halves of that are true and an essay should say so.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Hard Times serialized, and to whom is it dedicated?
    Show the full solution

    1854, dedicated to Thomas Carlyle

  2. Name the three books of the novel.
    Show the full solution

    Sowing, Reaping, Garnering

  3. What does Sleary's circus stand for?
    Show the full solution

    Fancy, against Gradgrind's fact

  4. Name three of the novel's meaningful names.
    Show the full solution

    Gradgrind, Bounderby, M'Choakumchild, Sleary

  5. How does Gradgrind address Sissy Jupe?
    Show the full solution

    As girl number twenty

  6. What does the self-correcting first sentence argue?
    Show the full solution

    That the town's actual color cannot be stated directly, because industry has interposed itself between the object and its description. Dickens states a fact, withdraws it, and replaces it inside one sentence, so the syntax performs the pollution rather than reporting it. The sentence's self-correction is the pollution

  7. Analyze the serpents of smoke.
    Show the full solution

    Smoke that trails "for ever and ever" and "never got uncoiled" is unnatural motion: a snake moving perpetually without ever completing the movement. The image makes ceaseless industrial activity a form of stasis, which is the novel's argument about Coketown compressed into one clause. Perpetual motion that achieves nothing

  8. Why is "squarely pointing with his square forefinger" clumsy on purpose?
    Show the full solution

    Because Gradgrind is composed of right angles and the prose is too. Repeating a word and its adverb in one clause is a fault in most writing and here it reproduces the character's rigidity at the level of the sentence. The style is doing characterization that the description would otherwise have to assert. The prose is as rectangular as the man

  9. What do the three words "girl number twenty" establish?
    Show the full solution

    The entire critique of Gradgrind's educational philosophy. He addresses a child by her position in a register, then asks "who is that girl" in the third person while pointing at her, so she is present and discussed as absent. That is what treating people as data does, demonstrated before any argument is made. A person addressed as an entry in a register

  10. State the question worth arguing about Dickens's method.
    Show the full solution

    Whether the schematic method serves the case. It makes the critique vivid and impossible to misunderstand, and it also means Dickens is arguing against a caricature of utilitarianism rather than against Mill. Both halves are true, and an essay should say so rather than defending the characters as realistic or dismissing them as cartoons. Vividness bought at the cost of arguing against a caricature

Lesson 4.9 · Unit 4 · RL.11-12.6, RL.11-12.3

The first person and the Victorian interior

Jane Eyre was published in 1847 under a male pseudonym and was immediately both a success and a scandal. The scandal was not the plot. It was that a plain, poor, dependent woman narrated her own life and insisted the reader attend to it.

The key ideas
  1. Charlotte Bronte published Jane Eyre in 1847 as Currer Bell.
  2. All three sisters used male pseudonyms: Currer, Ellis and Acton Bell.
  3. The bildungsroman is a novel of formation, following a protagonist from childhood to a settled self.
  4. The novel has five settings, Gateshead, Lowood, Thornfield, Moor House and Ferndean, each a stage in Jane's development.
  5. "Reader, I married him" is the most famous direct address in the English novel.
  6. The direct address recurs throughout, and it asserts Jane's authority over her own story.
  7. Gothic elements are used and then explained, which is a structural decision rather than a genre.
  8. Bertha Mason is the novel's most debated figure, and later criticism has read the book from her position.

Where students lose marks: summarizing the plot. Write about the narration: who is speaking, to whom, at what distance in time, and what the adult narrator does with the child's experience.

Worked example

The text. Charlotte Bronte, Jane Eyre, 1847. Public domain.

Do you think, because I am poor, obscure, plain, and little, I am soulless and heartless? You think wrong! I have as much soul as you, and full as much heart! And if God had gifted me with some beauty and much wealth, I should have made it as hard for you to leave me, as it is now for me to leave you.

Reader, I married him. A quiet wedding we had.

Step one: read the list in the first sentence. Poor, obscure, plain and little. Jane names four disadvantages, in order, without softening any of them.

Step two: state what the list does. It concedes the entire case against her before making her argument. A reader inclined to dismiss her has nothing left to say, because she has said it first and more precisely.

Step three: notice the rhetorical structure. A question, a contradiction, an assertion, and then a counterfactual. Four moves in four sentences, and the counterfactual is the strongest, because it concedes that her position depends on circumstances rather than on merit.

Step four: read the counterfactual carefully. With beauty and wealth she would have made it as hard for him to leave as it is for her to leave him. She is not claiming equality of worth but pointing out that worth is not what is being measured.

Step five: turn to the famous address. "Reader, I married him." Not "we were married" and not "he married me". Jane is the grammatical subject of her own marriage.

Step six: state why the syntax matters. In 1847 a woman was the object of a marriage in almost every sense the law recognized. Putting Jane in the subject position is a claim about agency made by word order, and the novel earns it by having her return only when she is independent.

Step seven: work the direct address itself. "Reader" appears throughout the book, and it asserts that the story has a teller who is choosing what to include. The narration is a performance Jane controls, which is the opposite of the female position the novel describes.

Step eight: state what makes the novel analyzable. The gap between the child who experienced Lowood and the adult who is telling it. The narrator judges, selects and addresses, and tracking what the adult voice does to the child's material is where the essays are.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Jane Eyre published, and under what name?
    Show the full solution

    1847, as Currer Bell

  2. Name the three Bell pseudonyms.
    Show the full solution

    Currer, Ellis and Acton Bell

  3. What is a bildungsroman?
    Show the full solution

    A novel of formation, following a protagonist to a settled self

  4. Name the novel's five settings.
    Show the full solution

    Gateshead, Lowood, Thornfield, Moor House, Ferndean

  5. Quote the novel's most famous direct address.
    Show the full solution

    "Reader, I married him."

  6. What does Jane's list of four disadvantages accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    It concedes the entire case against her before she makes her argument. Poor, obscure, plain and little, named in order without softening, leaves a reader inclined to dismiss her with nothing left to say, because she has said it first and more precisely than they would have. It concedes the case against her before she argues

  7. Why is the counterfactual the strongest move in the speech?
    Show the full solution

    Because it concedes that her position depends on circumstances rather than on merit. With beauty and wealth she would have made leaving as hard for him as it is for her. She is not claiming equality of worth but pointing out that worth is not what is being measured, which is a far more difficult argument to answer. It shows worth is not what is being measured

  8. Analyze the syntax of "Reader, I married him."
    Show the full solution

    Not "we were married" and not "he married me": Jane is the grammatical subject of her own marriage. In 1847 a woman was the object of a marriage in almost every sense the law recognized, so putting her in the subject position is a claim about agency made by word order alone. She is the subject of the sentence and of the marriage

  9. What does the recurring address to the reader assert?
    Show the full solution

    That the story has a teller who is choosing what to include. "Reader" appears throughout the book, making the narration a performance Jane controls, which is the exact opposite of the position the novel describes women as occupying. The address is an argument about authority delivered as a mannerism. That Jane controls the telling

  10. What makes the novel's narration worth analyzing?
    Show the full solution

    The gap between the child who experienced Gateshead and Lowood and the adult who is telling it. The narrator judges, selects, addresses and withholds, so tracking what the adult voice does to the child's material is where the essays are. Summarizing the plot discards the only thing that is actually complicated about the book. The distance between the child's experience and the adult's telling

Unit 4 review · The Victorians

Ten questions across the whole unit

Questions 1 to 5 check that you hold the terms. Questions 6 to 10 require you to reason across the nine lessons.

  1. What years does the Victorian period cover?
    Show the full solution

    1837 to 1901

  2. Name the four features of a dramatic monologue.
    Show the full solution

    One speaker who is not the poet, a silent listener, a specific moment, unintended revelation

  3. How long was a monthly serial number?
    Show the full solution

    Thirty-two pages

  4. What is a bildungsroman?
    Show the full solution

    A novel of formation, following a protagonist to a settled self

  5. What did Hardy call his position?
    Show the full solution

    Evolutionary meliorism

  6. Why does Victorian doubt predate Darwin?
    Show the full solution

    Because its source was geology. In Memoriam was written from 1833 and published in 1850, nine years before the Origin, and Tennyson's bleakest stanza cites "scarped cliff and quarried stone". Lyell's methods had already established that most species which ever existed are extinct, so the fossil record supplied the anxiety before any theory explained it. Geology had already established mass extinction

  7. Why is the Duke's euphemism more damning than a confession?
    Show the full solution

    A confession would make him a murderer. "I gave commands; then all smiles stopped together" contains no verb of killing and no object, which makes him a man for whom having a wife killed is not the sort of thing one specifies. He is speaking to an envoy arranging his next marriage, so the casualness is also a warning. The casualness shows the act is beneath his notice

  8. Why is "he is mad" an inadequate reading of Porphyria's Lover?
    Show the full solution

    Because madness is a label rather than an analysis, and the speaker's reasoning is internally consistent: she wanted to be his, she could not be permanently, he made her permanently, and heaven did not object. Every step follows. The only false step is the first, which is the premise romantic poetry trains a reader to accept. The reasoning is consistent; only the first premise is false

  9. How did the serial format shape the Victorian novel?
    Show the full solution

    Thirty-two pages a month for nineteen months required each installment to have its own shape and a hook, subplots to keep a large cast circulating so no thread went cold, and recapitulation built in. Weekly publication compressed all of it, which is why Hard Times is Dickens's shortest novel and Gradgrind arrives complete in twenty words. Length, subplots, hooks and recapitulation all follow from it

  10. What does the syntax of "Reader, I married him" claim?
    Show the full solution

    Agency. Not "we were married" and not "he married me": Jane is the grammatical subject of her own marriage, at a date when a woman was the object of one in almost every sense the law recognized. The recurring address to the reader makes the same claim throughout, asserting that the story has a teller who is choosing what to include. That she is the subject of her marriage and of her story

Lesson 5.1 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.9

What the war did to English form

Modernism is the last movement in this course and the one that treats the tradition behind it as a problem rather than an inheritance. Understanding it requires knowing exactly what its writers thought had stopped working.

The key ideas
  1. English modernism runs from about 1910 to 1939, with its central years just after the First World War.
  2. Virginia Woolf wrote that human character changed in or about December 1910, which is a claim about perception.
  3. The war of 1914 to 1918 killed nearly a million from Britain and its empire, and discredited the language used to justify it.
  4. Modernism distrusts continuous narrative, reliable narrators and settled endings.
  5. Fragmentation and allusion are its two characteristic methods.
  6. Free verse became respectable, promoted by Pound's imagist principles of 1913.
  7. Stream of consciousness moved the novel from what happens to what is being thought.
  8. The reader's work increases, because the connections the text omits have to be supplied.

Where students lose marks: explaining modernism entirely by the war. Woolf dates the change to 1910, four years before it began, and the movement was already answering Victorian confidence in prose and verse.

Worked example

The texts. Alfred Tennyson, In Memoriam, 1850; T. S. Eliot, "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock", 1915. Both public domain.

That God, which ever lives and loves,
One God, one law, one element,
And one far-off divine event,
To which the whole creation moves.

Tennyson

Let us go then, you and I,
When the evening is spread out against the sky
Like a patient etherised upon a table

Eliot

Step one: read Tennyson's stanza as a shape. One God, one law, one element, one event, and creation moving toward it. Four repetitions of "one", and everything in the universe is heading the same way.

Step two: state what that assumes. A direction. Tennyson's poem spent 130 sections in doubt and arrives at a claim that the whole of existence has a purpose it is traveling toward.

Step three: read Eliot's opening for its meter. The first two lines rhyme and scan almost conventionally. A reader is set up for a love song, and the title has promised one.

Step four: read the third line. "Like a patient etherised upon a table." The simile is medical, unconscious and about to be cut open, and it arrives attached to an evening sky.

Step five: state what the simile does structurally. It breaks the meter, breaks the register and breaks the promise of the title in one line. Three expectations are withdrawn at once, and the poem has barely begun.

Step six: state the difference between the two passages. Tennyson's comparison directs the reader toward a resolution the poem believes in. Eliot's comparison directs the reader toward an image that explains nothing about an evening and reveals a great deal about the speaker.

Step seven: state what has happened to the simile as a device. It has stopped clarifying the subject and started characterizing the observer. That shift is the whole of modernist imagery in one sentence.

Step eight: state the method for the unit. For each text, ask what has been withheld and what the reader must supply. In Eliot it is connection, in Conrad it is a judgment, in Woolf it is a plot, and in Yeats it is a system. The work transferred is what makes the writing modernist.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. What period does English modernism cover?
    Show the full solution

    About 1910 to 1939

  2. What date did Woolf give for the change in human character?
    Show the full solution

    In or about December 1910

  3. Name modernism's two characteristic methods.
    Show the full solution

    Fragmentation and allusion

  4. Who promoted imagist principles, and when?
    Show the full solution

    Ezra Pound, in 1913

  5. What does stream of consciousness move the novel toward?
    Show the full solution

    What is being thought rather than what happens

  6. What does Tennyson's stanza assume?
    Show the full solution

    A direction. One God, one law, one element and one far-off divine event, with the whole creation moving toward it: four repetitions of "one" and a universe with a destination. After 130 sections of doubt the poem arrives at a claim that existence has a purpose it is traveling toward. That the universe is going somewhere

  7. What does Eliot's third line break?
    Show the full solution

    Three things at once: the meter, which had been almost conventional; the register, which drops from evening sky to operating theater; and the promise of the title, which said love song. Three expectations are withdrawn in a single line and the poem has barely begun. The meter, the register and the title's promise

  8. What has happened to the simile as a device?
    Show the full solution

    It has stopped clarifying the subject and started characterizing the observer. "Etherised upon a table" explains nothing about an evening sky and reveals a great deal about a man who reaches for that comparison. The shift from illuminating the object to exposing the perceiver is the whole of modernist imagery. It now reveals the observer, not the subject

  9. Why is the war an insufficient explanation on its own?
    Show the full solution

    Because Woolf dates the change to December 1910, four years before it began, and the movement was already answering Victorian confidence in both prose and verse. The war accelerated and confirmed a break that had other causes, including new physics, new psychology and the exhaustion of nineteenth-century forms. The break was already under way by 1910

  10. State the method for reading this unit.
    Show the full solution

    For each text, ask what has been withheld and what the reader must supply. Eliot withholds connection, Conrad withholds a judgment, Woolf withholds a plot, and Yeats withholds a system the reader is not required to believe. The work transferred to the reader is what makes the writing modernist. Ask what is withheld and who has to supply it

Lesson 5.2 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.9

The early lyric and the late voice

Yeats is the only major poet who wrote in the 1880s and in the 1930s and was a different and better poet at the end. Comparing early and late Yeats is the clearest available demonstration that a style is a set of choices rather than a personality.

The key ideas
  1. W. B. Yeats published from 1889 to 1939, and the work up to 1928 is public domain in the United States.
  2. The early poems are Celtic Twilight: dreamy, Irish-mythological, heavily adjectival.
  3. The late poems are hard, spoken and concrete, with far fewer adjectives.
  4. Pound worked as his secretary from 1913 and pushed him toward concreteness.
  5. The Easter Rising of 1916 gave him a public subject and changed what he thought poetry could do.
  6. Maud Gonne is the subject of the early love poems and refused him repeatedly.
  7. The Tower, 1928, contains the late masterpieces including "Sailing to Byzantium".
  8. He kept rhyme and stanza throughout, so the change is in diction and syntax rather than in form.

Where students lose marks: treating the change as a mystery of maturity. Count the adjectives, look at the verbs, and check whether the sentences run across the line breaks. The difference is measurable.

Worked example

The texts. W. B. Yeats, "The Lake Isle of Innisfree", 1890, and "Sailing to Byzantium", from The Tower, 1928. Both public domain.

I will arise and go now, and go to Innisfree,
And a small cabin build there, of clay and wattles made;
Nine bean-rows will I have there, a hive for the honey-bee,
And live alone in the bee-loud glade.

That is no country for old men. The young
In one another's arms, birds in the trees
...Caught in that sensual music all neglect
Monuments of unageing intellect.

An aged man is but a paltry thing,
A tattered coat upon a stick, unless
Soul clap its hands and sing

Step one: read the first line's syntax. "I will arise and go now, and go to Innisfree." Inverted, biblical in cadence, and the verb is repeated for rhythm rather than for sense.

Step two: count the adjectives in the early stanza. Small, nine, bee-loud. The nouns arrive pre-decorated, and "bee-loud glade" is the sort of coinage the Celtic Twilight specialized in: beautiful, atmospheric and imprecise.

Step three: notice what the early poem wants. To leave. It is a poem of yearning toward a place the speaker is not, written in a register that makes the place unreachable by design.

Step four: read the late opening. "That is no country for old men." Seven monosyllables, a flat declarative, and a full stop before the line ends. Nothing is decorated and the sentence breaks in the middle of the line.

Step five: analyze "a tattered coat upon a stick". A scarecrow, named without being named. It is concrete, unbeautiful, exact, and it is a self-description by a man in his sixties. The early Yeats had no vocabulary for this.

Step six: compare the verbs. Early: arise, go, build, have, live. All gentle and all future tense. Late: caught, neglect, clap, sing. Present, active, and in one case violent.

Step seven: check the line endings. The early stanza ends its sentences with its lines. The late one runs "The young / In one another's arms" across the break, so the syntax fights the form, and the tension is audible.

Step eight: state what changed and what did not. Diction, syntax and subject changed completely; rhyme and stanza did not. Yeats proves that a poet can transform a style without abandoning form, which is the direct counter-example to the assumption that modernism required free verse.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Over what years did Yeats publish?
    Show the full solution

    1889 to 1939

  2. Describe the early style.
    Show the full solution

    Celtic Twilight: dreamy, mythological, heavily adjectival

  3. Who worked as his secretary from 1913?
    Show the full solution

    Ezra Pound

  4. What event gave him a public subject?
    Show the full solution

    The Easter Rising of 1916

  5. In which collection does "Sailing to Byzantium" appear?
    Show the full solution

    The Tower, 1928

  6. What is characteristic of the early poem's diction?
    Show the full solution

    The nouns arrive pre-decorated. Small cabin, nine bean-rows, bee-loud glade: the coinage is beautiful, atmospheric and imprecise, and the syntax is inverted into a biblical cadence with "I will arise and go now". Every choice softens rather than specifies. Pre-decorated nouns and inverted, biblical syntax

  7. Analyze "That is no country for old men" as an opening.
    Show the full solution

    Seven monosyllables, a flat declarative, and a full stop before the line ends. Nothing is decorated, the sentence breaks mid-line, and the poem opens by rejecting a place rather than yearning toward one. It is the exact structural opposite of "I will arise and go now". Flat, monosyllabic, and stopped mid-line

  8. What does "a tattered coat upon a stick" achieve?
    Show the full solution

    It names a scarecrow without using the word, and it is concrete, unbeautiful and exact. A man in his sixties is describing himself with an image drawn from a field rather than from myth, and the early Yeats had no vocabulary capable of it. An exact, unflattering self-description drawn from an object

  9. Compare the verbs in the two passages.
    Show the full solution

    Early: arise, go, build, have, live, all gentle and all in the future tense. Late: caught, neglect, clap, sing, present and active, and "caught" is violent. The early poem is entirely about what will be done and the late one about what is happening, which is a difference measurable by counting. Gentle future verbs against active present ones

  10. What does Yeats's development prove about modernism?
    Show the full solution

    That a style can be transformed without abandoning form. Diction, syntax and subject changed completely while rhyme and stanza stayed, so the hardness and concreteness associated with modernism did not require free verse. Yeats is the direct counter-example to the assumption that the two came together. Modernist hardness did not require free verse

Lesson 5.3 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.4, RL.11-12.2

A system you do not have to believe

"The Second Coming" is twenty-two lines written in 1919 and it has supplied more headlines than any other poem in English. It rests on a private mystical system, and the useful finding is that a reader does not need the system at all.

The key ideas
  1. The poem was written in 1919 and published in 1920.
  2. Its context is the aftermath of the war, the Russian revolution, the influenza pandemic and the Irish war of independence.
  3. The gyre is Yeats's image for history as interpenetrating cones, each civilization unwinding as the next winds.
  4. A Vision, 1925, sets out the whole system, which he said came through his wife's automatic writing.
  5. The falconer is the poem's first image and it is about a failure of communication, not of loyalty.
  6. Spiritus Mundi is his term for a shared reservoir of images available to everyone.
  7. The sphinx figure is not the Antichrist named, and the poem never identifies it.
  8. The last line is a question, which is the most frequently forgotten fact about the poem.

Where students lose marks: explaining the poem entirely through A Vision. The images work without the system, and the poem's survival in ordinary use is the evidence that they do.

Worked example

The text. W. B. Yeats, "The Second Coming", 1920. Public domain.

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

Step one: read the falcon image without the system. A trained bird spirals outward until it can no longer hear its handler. The relation has not been broken by rebellion but by distance.

Step two: state why that distinction matters. This is not a poem about disobedience. It is about a controlling connection failing because the orbit got too wide, which is a much more disturbing account of how order ends.

Step three: analyze the three clauses in line three. "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold." Two independent statements joined by a semicolon, with no causal word between them. The reader supplies the relation.

Step four: read "mere anarchy". Mere in its older sense means pure or unmixed, not merely. The anarchy is undiluted rather than trivial, and a reader using the modern sense gets the line backwards.

Step five: work the couplet about conviction. The best lack it and the worst are full of passionate intensity. The line describes a specific political failure, which is why it has been quoted continuously for a century in circumstances Yeats never imagined.

Step six: state what "slouches" does. Not strides, not comes. Slouching is slow, graceless and unhurried, which makes the arriving thing both inevitable and uninterested in the prophecy it is fulfilling.

Step seven: notice the last line's punctuation. It is a question mark. The poem does not identify the beast, does not say it is the Antichrist, and ends by asking. The most quoted apocalyptic poem in English declines to name what is coming.

Step eight: state why the system is optional. Everything in the poem that works, the falcon, the widening spiral, the two kinds of people, the unhurried arrival, is legible without A Vision. The gyre explains where Yeats got the shape; it does not explain why the poem still functions for readers who have never heard of it.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was the poem written and published?
    Show the full solution

    Written 1919, published 1920

  2. What is a gyre?
    Show the full solution

    Yeats's image of history as interpenetrating cones

  3. What book sets out the system, and when?
    Show the full solution

    A Vision, 1925

  4. What is Spiritus Mundi?
    Show the full solution

    A shared reservoir of images available to everyone

  5. What punctuation ends the poem?
    Show the full solution

    A question mark

  6. Why does the falcon image describe distance rather than rebellion?
    Show the full solution

    The bird spirals outward until it cannot hear the falconer, so the relation fails because the orbit grew too wide rather than because the falcon disobeyed. That is a much more disturbing account of how order ends: nobody rebelled, and the connection simply stopped reaching. Nothing rebelled; the connection stopped reaching

  7. What does the semicolon in line three require of the reader?
    Show the full solution

    "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold" joins two independent statements with no causal word between them, so the reader decides whether the centre fails because things fell apart or the reverse. The poem supplies the two facts and withholds the relation, which is the modernist procedure applied to punctuation. The reader supplies the causal relation

  8. Why does "mere anarchy" mislead modern readers?
    Show the full solution

    Because "mere" here has its older sense of pure or unmixed rather than the modern sense of trivial. The anarchy is undiluted, not slight, and a reader importing the current meaning gets the line exactly backwards. It is the clearest case in the poem for checking a word's date. "Mere" means pure, not trivial

  9. Analyze "slouches".
    Show the full solution

    Not strides and not comes. Slouching is slow, graceless and unhurried, so the arriving thing is both inevitable and entirely uninterested in the prophecy it fulfills. One verb makes the apocalypse indifferent, which is far worse than making it malevolent. It makes the arrival inevitable and uninterested

  10. Why is A Vision optional for reading this poem?
    Show the full solution

    Because everything that works in the poem is legible without it: the falcon, the widening spiral, the two kinds of people, the unhurried arrival, the unanswered question. The gyre explains where Yeats got the shape and does not explain why the poem still functions for readers who have never heard of the system. Its survival in ordinary use is the evidence. The images work without it, which is why the poem survives

Lesson 5.4 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.6, RL.11-12.4

Prufrock and the speaker who cannot begin

Prufrock is a dramatic monologue with the drama removed. Browning's speakers act and then explain; Eliot's speaker never does anything at all, and the poem is about the experience of being that person from the inside.

The key ideas
  1. "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" was published in 1915 and collected in 1917.
  2. It inherits the dramatic monologue from Browning and removes the action.
  3. The epigraph is from Dante's Inferno, spoken by a soul who answers only because he believes nobody will report it.
  4. The objective correlative is Eliot's term for a set of objects that evokes an emotion without naming it.
  5. The verse is irregular, rhyming unpredictably, which is closer to free verse than to blank verse.
  6. The overwhelming question is never stated, and the poem's whole action is not asking it.
  7. The refrain about Michelangelo returns twice, unchanged, and is never explained.
  8. Prufrock compares himself to Hamlet and withdraws it, which is the poem's clearest piece of self-assessment.

Where students lose marks: searching for what the overwhelming question is. The poem's structure requires that it stay unspecified, because a named question could be answered and the paralysis would end.

Worked example

The text. T. S. Eliot, "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock", 1915. Public domain.

In the room the women come and go
Talking of Michelangelo.

And indeed there will be time
To wonder, "Do I dare?" and, "Do I dare?"
Time to turn back and descend the stair,
With a bald spot in the middle of my hair

No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be;
Am an attendant lord, one that will do
To swell a progress, start a scene or two...
Almost, at times, the Fool.

Step one: read the couplet's rhyme. Go and Michelangelo. A four-syllable Italian name rhymed with a monosyllable, which is a comic rhyme in a poem that is not funny.

Step two: state what the couplet establishes. Cultured conversation happening at a distance from a man who is not part of it. The women come and go, which is movement without arrival, and the poem's speaker is outside the room in every sense but the physical.

Step three: work the repetition of "Do I dare?". Asked twice in one line, with no object either time. The question has no content, so it cannot be answered, and the line's structure is the paralysis it describes.

Step four: read the bald spot. It arrives in the middle of a meditation on time and courage, in a rhyme position, three lines after "Do I dare". The trivial physical detail interrupts the large question, which is exactly what happens in the mind being described.

Step five: state what the rhyme does there. Dare, stair, hair. Three rhymes in four lines descending from courage to furniture to a bald spot. The sound pattern tracks the deflation.

Step six: read the Hamlet passage. He denies being Hamlet, which nobody suggested, then accepts a smaller role, then reduces that role twice more, ending at "the Fool".

Step seven: state what the sequence reveals. Self-deprecation performed at length is still a performance, and a man who spends five lines arranging his own insignificance is thinking about himself continuously. The modesty is the vanity.

Step eight: state why the overwhelming question stays unnamed. A specified question could be asked and answered, and the poem would end. The paralysis requires that the thing not be sayable, which is why every attempt to identify it makes the poem smaller.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Prufrock published?
    Show the full solution

    1915, collected 1917

  2. Where is the epigraph from?
    Show the full solution

    Dante's Inferno

  3. Define the objective correlative.
    Show the full solution

    A set of objects that evokes an emotion without naming it

  4. What are the women talking of?
    Show the full solution

    Michelangelo

  5. What does Prufrock say he is not?
    Show the full solution

    Prince Hamlet

  6. What does the Michelangelo rhyme accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    A four-syllable Italian name rhymed with a monosyllable is a comic rhyme, placed in a poem that is not funny. The effect is of cultured conversation heard at a distance and slightly mocked by the person overhearing it, and the women who "come and go" are moving without arriving. The speaker is outside the room in every sense but the physical. A comic rhyme places the speaker outside the conversation

  7. Why is "Do I dare?" unanswerable?
    Show the full solution

    Because it has no object either time it is asked. A question with no content cannot be answered, so repeating it produces motion without progress, and the line's structure is the paralysis it describes rather than a report of it. This is the whole poem in one line. It has no object, so it cannot be resolved

  8. What does the bald spot do to the passage?
    Show the full solution

    It interrupts a meditation on time and courage with a trivial physical detail, in the rhyme position, three lines after "Do I dare". That is exactly what happens in the mind being described, and the rhyme sequence dare, stair, hair tracks the deflation from courage through furniture to a receding hairline. The trivial detail interrupts the large question, as it does in the mind

  9. Analyze the Hamlet sequence.
    Show the full solution

    He denies being Hamlet, which nobody suggested, accepts a smaller role, and then reduces it twice more, ending at "the Fool". Self-deprecation performed at length is still a performance, and a man who spends five lines arranging his own insignificance is thinking about himself continuously. The modesty is the vanity. Sustained self-deprecation is still self-absorption

  10. Why must the overwhelming question stay unnamed?
    Show the full solution

    Because a specified question could be asked and answered, and the poem would end. The paralysis requires that the thing not be sayable, so every attempt to identify it as a proposal, a confession or a request makes the poem smaller. The absence is structural. Naming it would make it answerable and end the poem

Lesson 5.5 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.7

Allusion, and the fragment as method

The Waste Land is 434 lines assembled from quotations, voices and scenes with nothing joining them. It is the most difficult poem most students will meet, and the difficulty is the argument rather than an obstacle to it.

The key ideas
  1. The Waste Land was published in 1922 and is public domain in the United States.
  2. Pound cut it by roughly half, and Eliot dedicated it to him as the better craftsman.
  3. It has five sections and no continuous narrator or plot.
  4. Allusion is its structural principle, drawing on Dante, Shakespeare, the Bible, Wagner, the Upanishads and more.
  5. Eliot supplied notes, partly to fill pages, and they have caused as much confusion as help.
  6. Juxtaposition replaces transition, so scenes are placed against each other without connectives.
  7. The many voices include a clairvoyante, a pub conversation, a typist and a prophet.
  8. "These fragments I have shored against my ruins" is the poem's own account of its method.

Where students lose marks: hunting every allusion and writing about the sources. Write about what the juxtaposition does, since the effect of two things placed together is available to a reader who has traced neither of them.

Worked example

The text. T. S. Eliot, The Waste Land, 1922. Public domain.

April is the cruellest month, breeding
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain.

Unreal City,
Under the brown fog of a winter dawn,
A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,
I had not thought death had undone so many.

These fragments I have shored against my ruins

Step one: hear what the opening answers. Chaucer begins the English tradition with April's sweet showers bringing flowers and sending people on pilgrimage. Eliot opens with April as the cruellest month.

Step two: state what the inversion argues. Renewal is painful when nothing in the person is capable of renewing. The tradition's first image of hope is turned into a complaint in five words, and a reader who knows unit 1 receives that as an argument about six hundred years.

Step three: notice the participles. Breeding, mixing, stirring. Three present participles ending three consecutive lines, so each line spills into the next and nothing completes. The syntax refuses the closure the couplet spent the eighteenth century providing.

Step four: read the London Bridge passage. A modern commuter crowd is described in a line adapted from Dante's account of the souls in Limbo. The city is named unreal and the crowd is the dead.

Step five: state what the juxtaposition does without the source. Even a reader who has not read Dante receives "I had not thought death had undone so many" attached to office workers on a bridge. The allusion enriches; the effect does not depend on it.

Step six: state why that matters for writing about the poem. An essay can analyze the collision of a commute with a line about the dead without an inventory of sources. Tracing every allusion produces a bibliography rather than a reading.

Step seven: read the poem's self-description. "These fragments I have shored against my ruins." Shored means propped up, and ruins are already ruined, so the speaker is bracing a collapse with pieces of other things.

Step eight: state the finding. The poem is not a broken whole. It is an assembly of fragments offered as the only structure available after the whole has gone, and the difficulty a reader experiences is the condition the poem is about.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was The Waste Land published?
    Show the full solution

    1922

  2. Who cut it, and by how much?
    Show the full solution

    Ezra Pound, by roughly half

  3. How many sections does it have?
    Show the full solution

    Five

  4. What replaces transition in the poem?
    Show the full solution

    Juxtaposition

  5. Quote the poem's account of its own method.
    Show the full solution

    "These fragments I have shored against my ruins"

  6. What does the opening line answer?
    Show the full solution

    Chaucer, who begins the English tradition with April's sweet showers bringing flowers and sending people on pilgrimage. Eliot opens with April as the cruellest month, so the tradition's first image of hope is inverted in five words. A reader who has done unit 1 receives that as an argument about six hundred years. Chaucer's April, inverted

  7. What do the three participles accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    Breeding, mixing, stirring end three consecutive lines, so each spills into the next and nothing completes. The syntax refuses the closure the heroic couplet spent the eighteenth century providing, and the reader is kept in continuous unfinished motion from the poem's first sentence. They keep every line unfinished

  8. Why does the London Bridge passage work without Dante?
    Show the full solution

    Because the effect of the juxtaposition is available to any reader. "I had not thought death had undone so many" attached to a commuter crowd under brown fog makes the city a place of the dead, whether or not the reader recognizes the line from the Inferno. The allusion enriches and the effect does not depend on it. The collision works whether or not the source is recognized

  9. What is wrong with an essay that traces every allusion?
    Show the full solution

    It produces a bibliography rather than a reading. Identifying that a line comes from Dante or Wagner or the Upanishads says nothing about what the poem does with it, and the analysis is in the collision between a source and its new setting. Sources are evidence, not conclusions. Naming sources is not reading the juxtaposition

  10. Analyze "shored against my ruins".
    Show the full solution

    Shoring means propping up, and ruins are already ruined, so the speaker is bracing a collapse that has already happened with pieces of other things. The poem is therefore not a broken whole but an assembly offered as the only structure available after the whole has gone, and the difficulty a reader experiences is the condition the poem is about. Propping an existing collapse with borrowed pieces

Lesson 5.6 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.6, RL.11-12.5

Heart of Darkness and the frame narrator

Conrad's novella is told by a man on a boat repeating what another man told him on another boat. Every judgment in it reaches the reader through two people, and the structure is inseparable from the book's argument and from the objections to it.

The key ideas
  1. Heart of Darkness was serialized in 1899 and published as a book in 1902.
  2. Conrad's first language was Polish, his second French, and he learned English in his twenties.
  3. The frame narrative has an unnamed listener reporting Marlow's spoken account.
  4. The historical subject is the Congo Free State, held personally by Leopold II of Belgium from 1885 to 1908.
  5. Conrad went up the Congo in 1890 as a steamboat officer.
  6. Delayed decoding is his technique of giving the sensation before the explanation.
  7. Chinua Achebe's 1975 lecture called Conrad a thoroughgoing racist and reset the critical conversation.
  8. The frame complicates but does not settle that charge, which is the question worth arguing.

Where students lose marks: attributing Marlow's views to Conrad without argument, or dismissing Achebe's objection by pointing at the frame. Both moves skip the work. State what the frame does and then say whether it is sufficient.

Worked example

The text. Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness, 1899. Public domain.

And this also, said Marlow suddenly, has been one of the dark places of the earth.

The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much.

Sticks, little sticks, were flying about, thick: they were whizzing before my nose, dropping below me, striking behind me against my pilot-house... Arrows, by Jove! We were being shot at!

Step one: place the first sentence. Marlow is on a boat on the Thames, looking at London, and he says "this also" has been one of the dark places of the earth. He means Roman Britain.

Step two: state what that establishes. The book opens by making England the colonized place. Before any African setting appears, the reader has been told that the civilized and the dark are positions in time rather than properties of peoples.

Step three: read the second passage's grammar. "Conquest... is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much." The judgment is delivered in understatement, and "too much" concedes that looking at all is optional.

Step four: state the difficulty in that sentence. It names the racial basis of conquest exactly, "different complexion or slightly flatter noses", and describes the result as not pretty. The observation is precise and the evaluation is enormously inadequate, and both are Marlow's.

Step five: identify delayed decoding in the third passage. Marlow sees little sticks flying, notices they are whizzing, and only then realizes they are arrows. The sensation arrives before the interpretation.

Step six: state why that technique matters. It puts the reader in the instant of perception rather than in the summary afterward. Conrad is doing in 1899 what modernist fiction would be praised for doing in the 1920s.

Step seven: state what the frame does. Marlow's account is repeated by an unnamed listener who has his own reactions, so every judgment reaches the reader at two removes, and the novella can present Marlow's views without endorsing them.

Step eight: state the honest position on Achebe. The frame creates distance and does not create a counter-voice. No African character in the book speaks at length or is named except Kurtz's servant reporting a death, so the structure that complicates Marlow leaves Achebe's central objection standing. An essay should hold both the technique and the absence.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Heart of Darkness serialized and published?
    Show the full solution

    Serialized 1899, published as a book 1902

  2. What was Conrad's first language?
    Show the full solution

    Polish

  3. What is the historical subject?
    Show the full solution

    The Congo Free State, held personally by Leopold II

  4. Define delayed decoding.
    Show the full solution

    Giving the sensation before the explanation

  5. What did Achebe argue, and when?
    Show the full solution

    In a 1975 lecture, that Conrad was a thoroughgoing racist

  6. What does the opening sentence about London establish?
    Show the full solution

    That England was itself a dark place, under Rome. Before any African setting appears, the reader is told that the civilized and the dark are positions in time rather than properties of peoples, which is a genuinely radical framing for 1899 and is placed first for that reason. Civilization is a position in time, not a property

  7. State the difficulty in the sentence about conquest.
    Show the full solution

    It names the racial basis of conquest exactly, "a different complexion or slightly flatter noses", and evaluates the result as "not a pretty thing when you look into it too much". The observation is precise and the evaluation is enormously inadequate, and "too much" concedes that looking at all is optional. Both halves are Marlow's. Exact observation with grossly inadequate evaluation

  8. Explain the arrows passage as technique.
    Show the full solution

    Marlow sees little sticks, notices they are whizzing, and only then identifies them as arrows, so the sensation arrives before the interpretation. That is delayed decoding, and it puts the reader in the instant of perception rather than in the summary afterward. Conrad is doing in 1899 what modernist fiction would be praised for in the 1920s. Sensation first, then identification, as perception works

  9. What does the frame narrative accomplish?
    Show the full solution

    It puts every judgment at two removes: Marlow speaks on a boat and an unnamed listener repeats it, with his own reactions included. The novella can therefore present Marlow's views without endorsing them, and the reader is always aware that what they have is one man's account as remembered by another. It presents Marlow's views without endorsing them

  10. State an honest position on Achebe's objection.
    Show the full solution

    The frame creates distance and does not create a counter-voice. No African character in the book speaks at length or is named, so the structure that complicates Marlow leaves Achebe's central objection standing. An essay should hold both the sophistication of the technique and the absence it does not repair, rather than using one to dismiss the other. The frame distances Marlow and supplies no African voice

Lesson 5.7 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.5, RL.11-12.3

Mrs Dalloway and one day from the inside

Woolf's novel covers a single day in June and almost nothing happens in it. The interest is entirely in a technique: the narration moves between minds without announcement, and the book is held together by time and by objects rather than by plot.

The key ideas
  1. Mrs Dalloway was published in 1925 and is public domain in the United States.
  2. It covers one day in central London, a Wednesday in June 1923.
  3. Free indirect discourse is the technique: third-person narration carrying a character's own words and judgments.
  4. Woolf moves between consciousnesses without section breaks or announcements.
  5. Big Ben's chimes divide the day and are heard by different characters in different moods.
  6. Septimus Warren Smith is a shell-shocked veteran who never meets Clarissa.
  7. The two plots are joined only at the party, when Clarissa hears of his death.
  8. Woolf's essays argue that the novel should follow consciousness rather than incident.

Where students lose marks: complaining that nothing happens. State what the book does instead of plot: a day, a set of shared public events, and movement between minds that are never told about each other.

Worked example

The text. Virginia Woolf, Mrs Dalloway, 1925. Public domain.

Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself.

For Lucy had her work cut out for her. The doors would be taken off their hinges; Rumpelmayer's men were coming. And then, thought Clarissa Dalloway, what a morning, fresh as if issued to children on a beach.

The leaden circles dissolved in the air.

Step one: read the first sentence's position. "Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself." It reports speech that has already happened, so the novel begins after its opening conversation.

Step two: notice the shift in the second sentence. "For Lucy had her work cut out for her." That is Clarissa's reason, in Clarissa's phrasing, delivered in the third person. The narration has entered a mind without saying so.

Step three: name the technique. Free indirect discourse. The pronoun stays third person and the vocabulary belongs to the character, so a reader receives thought without quotation marks and without a "she thought".

Step four: state why Woolf needs it. Quotation marks would separate the thinking from the world. Free indirect discourse lets a sentence about doors and hinges be simultaneously a description and an interior, which is how a mind actually experiences a morning.

Step five: read the simile. "Fresh as if issued to children on a beach." Issued is a word from rationing or the army, and it is applied to a morning given out to children. The comparison is Clarissa's and it dates her: 1923, five years after a war.

Step six: work the Big Ben refrain. "The leaden circles dissolved in the air." The same sentence returns throughout the book, heard by different characters in different states. It is the same event and a different experience each time.

Step seven: state what that refrain does structurally. It supplies the connection that plot would otherwise provide. Characters who never meet are joined by having heard the same clock, which is a structure built out of simultaneity rather than causation.

Step eight: state what replaces plot. A day, shared public events, and movement between minds that never learn about each other. Clarissa hears of Septimus's death at her party from strangers, and the novel's only junction between its two halves is a piece of news at second hand.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Mrs Dalloway published, and when is it set?
    Show the full solution

    Published 1925; set on a Wednesday in June 1923

  2. Define free indirect discourse.
    Show the full solution

    Third-person narration carrying a character's own words and judgments

  3. What divides the day?
    Show the full solution

    The chimes of Big Ben

  4. Who is Septimus Warren Smith?
    Show the full solution

    A shell-shocked veteran who never meets Clarissa

  5. Where do the two plots meet?
    Show the full solution

    At the party, when Clarissa hears of his death

  6. How does the second sentence enter Clarissa's mind?
    Show the full solution

    "For Lucy had her work cut out for her" is Clarissa's reason in Clarissa's phrasing, delivered in the third person with no "she thought" and no quotation marks. The narration has moved inside a character without announcing it, which is free indirect discourse doing its work in the novel's second sentence. Her reason, in her words, in the third person

  7. Why does Woolf need this technique?
    Show the full solution

    Because quotation marks would separate the thinking from the world. Free indirect discourse lets a sentence about doors and hinges be simultaneously a description and an interior, which is how a mind actually experiences a morning: the world and the thought about it arrive together and undivided. It keeps thought and world in the same sentence

  8. Analyze "fresh as if issued to children on a beach".
    Show the full solution

    "Issued" belongs to rationing or the army and is applied here to a morning given out to children. The comparison is Clarissa's rather than the narrator's, and it dates her precisely: this is 1923, five years after a war, and the vocabulary of supply has entered how a woman describes a pleasant day. A wartime word applied to a summer morning

  9. What does the Big Ben refrain accomplish structurally?
    Show the full solution

    It supplies the connection plot would otherwise provide. The same sentence returns throughout, heard by different characters in different states, so people who never meet are joined by having heard one clock. The novel is built out of simultaneity rather than causation. It joins characters by simultaneity rather than by plot

  10. What replaces plot in this novel?
    Show the full solution

    A day, a set of shared public events, and movement between minds that never learn about each other. Clarissa hears of Septimus's death at her party, from strangers, at second hand, and that is the only junction between the book's two halves. Complaining that nothing happens describes the method rather than criticizing it. A day, shared events, and unannounced movement between minds

Lesson 5.8 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.2, RL.11-12.5

Dubliners and the epiphany

Joyce's fifteen stories are written in what he called a style of scrupulous meanness: plain, unadorned, withholding. Each one builds to a moment of sudden understanding that changes nothing, which is the form he invented.

The key ideas
  1. Dubliners was published in 1914 after nine years of disputes with printers and publishers.
  2. The fifteen stories are arranged by childhood, adolescence, maturity and public life.
  3. The epiphany is Joyce's term for a sudden spiritual manifestation occasioned by something ordinary.
  4. Paralysis is the collection's stated theme, and the word appears on the first page.
  5. Scrupulous meanness is his phrase for the deliberately plain style he chose.
  6. The epiphany usually changes nothing, which distinguishes it from a conventional climax.
  7. "The Dead" is the longest and last story, added after the rest were written.
  8. Joyce left Dublin in 1904 and wrote about it for the rest of his life.

Where students lose marks: treating an epiphany as a happy resolution. In Joyce it is usually a recognition of limitation, arriving too late to be acted on, which is the point of the arrangement.

Worked example

The texts. James Joyce, "Araby" and "The Dead", from Dubliners, 1914. Both public domain.

Gazing up into the darkness I saw myself as a creature driven and derided by vanity; and my eyes burned with anguish and anger.

Araby

His soul swooned slowly as he heard the snow falling faintly through the universe and faintly falling, like the descent of their last end, upon all the living and the dead.

The Dead

Step one: establish what has happened in Araby. A boy goes to a bazaar to buy a gift for a girl, arrives late, finds most stalls closed, overhears a trivial flirtation and buys nothing.

Step two: measure the event against the response. Nothing has gone wrong except a delay and a disappointment, and the closing sentence reports anguish, anger and a judgment on his own character.

Step three: state what an epiphany is from that. An ordinary occasion producing a disproportionate and total recognition. The trigger is trivial by design, since a sufficient cause would make the story about the cause.

Step four: read "driven and derided by vanity". Two passive participles and an abstract noun. The boy's self-accusation is expressed in a vocabulary no boy has, so the sentence belongs to an adult narrator remembering, which is the story's quiet structure.

Step five: state what the epiphany does not do. It changes nothing. The boy is still in the same street with the same life, and the story ends on the recognition rather than on any consequence of it.

Step six: read the sound of the closing sentence of The Dead. "Falling faintly... and faintly falling." The phrase is reversed, s and f sounds carry across the clause, and the rhythm slows toward the last four words.

Step seven: analyze "upon all the living and the dead". The snow does not distinguish. The story has spent fifty pages on a party, a marriage and a jealousy, and it ends by placing everybody in the same category.

Step eight: state what Gabriel's epiphany consists of. That his wife loved someone who died at seventeen, that he has never felt anything comparable, and that this is neither a betrayal nor a crisis but a fact about his life. The recognition arrives complete and nothing follows from it, which is the form Joyce built.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When was Dubliners published?
    Show the full solution

    1914

  2. How are the stories arranged?
    Show the full solution

    By childhood, adolescence, maturity and public life

  3. Define an epiphany in Joyce's sense.
    Show the full solution

    A sudden spiritual manifestation occasioned by something ordinary

  4. What word appears on the first page and names the theme?
    Show the full solution

    Paralysis

  5. What did Joyce call his style?
    Show the full solution

    Scrupulous meanness

  6. Why must the trigger of an epiphany be trivial?
    Show the full solution

    Because a sufficient cause would make the story about the cause. In Araby nothing has gone wrong except a delay and a disappointment, and the closing sentence reports anguish, anger and a total judgment on the boy's character. The disproportion is the form: an ordinary occasion produces a complete recognition. A sufficient cause would make the story about the event

  7. What does the vocabulary of "driven and derided by vanity" reveal?
    Show the full solution

    Two passive participles and an abstract noun, in a register no boy possesses. The sentence therefore belongs to an adult narrator remembering rather than to the child experiencing, which is the story's quiet structure and is never announced. The distance between the two is where the story's judgment lives. An adult narrator is remembering, not a boy speaking

  8. What distinguishes an epiphany from a climax?
    Show the full solution

    A climax changes the situation and an epiphany does not. The boy in Araby is still in the same street with the same life, and the story ends on the recognition rather than on any consequence. That is why the collection's theme is paralysis: the characters see clearly and remain exactly where they were. Nothing follows from it

  9. Analyze the sound of the last sentence of "The Dead".
    Show the full solution

    "Falling faintly... and faintly falling" reverses the phrase, carries s and f sounds across the clause, and slows the rhythm toward the last four words. The prose enacts the descent it describes, and the reversal makes the snow seem to fall twice, which is as close as English gets to a sound continuing after a sentence ends. The reversed phrase and slowing rhythm enact the snowfall

  10. What does Gabriel's epiphany consist of?
    Show the full solution

    That his wife loved a boy who died at seventeen, that he has never felt anything comparable, and that this is neither a betrayal nor a crisis but a fact about his life. The recognition arrives complete and nothing follows from it, and the snow that closes the story falls on all the living and the dead without distinguishing. A complete recognition of his own limitation, with no consequence

Lesson 5.9 · Unit 5 · RL.11-12.9, RI.11-12.6

Brooke, Sassoon and Owen

The war poets can be read as a single argument conducted over four years, in which the language available for describing a war is systematically dismantled by the people fighting it. Reading them in order is reading that dismantling happen.

The key ideas
  1. Rupert Brooke's 1914 sonnets were written before he saw combat, and he died of infection in 1915.
  2. Siegfried Sassoon's satires appeared from 1917 and attack civilians and staff officers directly.
  3. Wilfred Owen met Sassoon at Craiglockhart hospital in 1917 and was killed a week before the armistice.
  4. Owen's poems were published in 1920, after his death.
  5. His draft preface says the poetry is in the pity, and that he is not concerned with poetry.
  6. Pararhyme is his invention: consonants match and vowels do not, as in escaped and scooped.
  7. Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori is from Horace and means it is sweet and fitting to die for one's country.
  8. Owen calls it the old Lie, with a capital L.

Where students lose marks: treating Brooke as naive and stopping. He died before Loos, the Somme and Passchendaele. The sequence shows what happened to available language, not what was wrong with one man.

Worked example

The texts. Rupert Brooke, "The Soldier", 1914; Siegfried Sassoon, "Base Details", 1917; Wilfred Owen, "Dulce et Decorum Est", written 1917, published 1920. All public domain.

If I should die, think only this of me:
That there's some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England.

Brooke

If I were fierce, and bald, and short of breath,
I'd live with scarlet Majors at the Base,
And speed glum heroes up the line to death.

Sassoon

Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge
...If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs...
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.

Owen

Step one: read Brooke's form. A Petrarchan sonnet, beautifully made, written in 1914 before he had seen any fighting. The form is the most decorous available and the content is a soldier arranging his own memorial.

Step two: state what Brooke's poem does not contain. Any physical detail of war. There is no wound, no noise and no enemy, and the body becomes soil. It is a poem about dying written by someone who has not seen anyone die.

Step three: read Sassoon's method. Satire. "Scarlet Majors at the Base" who "speed glum heroes up the line to death", with the rhyme of breath and death closing the stanza. The target is not the enemy but his own side's staff.

Step four: notice the register. Sassoon writes in a rhymed, competent, almost jaunty measure. The mismatch between the tune and the accusation is the weapon.

Step five: read Owen's opening similes. Old beggars under sacks, knock-kneed, coughing like hags. Young soldiers described entirely in the vocabulary of aged poverty, which removes every trace of the heroic in one line and a half.

Step six: work "froth-corrupted lungs". Froth is the pulmonary oedema of gas poisoning and corrupted means both damaged and putrefying. It is a medical observation and a moral word in one compound, which is Owen's characteristic move.

Step seven: read the last four lines as an argument. A conditional, "If you could hear", then a conclusion, "you would not tell", then the naming of the claim as the old Lie. It is a formal refutation with a premise the reader cannot meet, since they cannot hear it.

Step eight: state what the three poems show together. Brooke uses the available language, Sassoon turns it against the people using it, and Owen ends by naming the central phrase a lie and printing it in Latin so the reader has to translate their own inheritance. The sequence is the dismantling of a vocabulary in four years.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. When did Brooke write his sonnets, and when did he die?
    Show the full solution

    1914, before combat; he died of infection in 1915

  2. Where did Owen meet Sassoon?
    Show the full solution

    Craiglockhart hospital, 1917

  3. What does Owen's draft preface say?
    Show the full solution

    That the poetry is in the pity, and he is not concerned with poetry

  4. Define pararhyme.
    Show the full solution

    Matching consonants with different vowels, as in escaped and scooped

  5. Translate the Horace line and say what Owen calls it.
    Show the full solution

    It is sweet and fitting to die for one's country; he calls it the old Lie

  6. What is missing from Brooke's sonnet?
    Show the full solution

    Any physical detail of war. There is no wound, no noise, no enemy and no fear, and the body becomes English soil. It is a poem about dying written by a man who had not yet seen anyone die, and the Petrarchan form is the most decorous container available. Every physical fact about war

  7. How does Sassoon's register work as a weapon?
    Show the full solution

    He writes in a rhymed, competent, almost jaunty measure and uses it to accuse his own side's staff of sending men to die from safety. The mismatch between the tune and the accusation is the attack: the poem sounds like light verse and reads like a charge sheet, which is harder to dismiss than a lament. A jaunty measure carrying a direct accusation

  8. Analyze Owen's opening similes.
    Show the full solution

    Old beggars under sacks, knock-kneed, coughing like hags: young soldiers described entirely in the vocabulary of aged poverty. Every trace of the heroic is removed in a line and a half, and the comparison chosen is one a recruiting poster could never accommodate. The refutation begins before any argument is made. Young men described as aged paupers

  9. Work "froth-corrupted lungs".
    Show the full solution

    Froth is the pulmonary oedema produced by gas, so the word is medically exact. "Corrupted" means both damaged and putrefying, and carries a moral charge as well as a clinical one. A single compound holds an accurate observation and a judgment, which is Owen's characteristic move throughout. Clinical accuracy and a moral word in one compound

  10. What do the three poets show together?
    Show the full solution

    Brooke uses the available language, Sassoon turns it against the people deploying it, and Owen names the central phrase a lie and prints it in Latin so readers must translate their own inheritance. Read in order, the sequence is the dismantling of a vocabulary over four years rather than a judgment on one naive man. A vocabulary being dismantled by the people using it

Unit 5 review · Modernism

Ten questions across the whole unit

Questions 1 to 5 check that you hold the terms. Questions 6 to 10 require you to reason across the nine lessons.

  1. What period does English modernism cover?
    Show the full solution

    About 1910 to 1939

  2. Name modernism's two characteristic methods.
    Show the full solution

    Fragmentation and allusion

  3. What is a gyre?
    Show the full solution

    Yeats's image of history as interpenetrating cones

  4. Define delayed decoding and free indirect discourse.
    Show the full solution

    Giving the sensation before the explanation; third-person narration carrying a character's own words

  5. Define pararhyme.
    Show the full solution

    Matching consonants with different vowels, as in escaped and scooped

  6. What has happened to the simile by Eliot's time?
    Show the full solution

    It has stopped clarifying the subject and started characterizing the observer. "The evening spread out against the sky / Like a patient etherised upon a table" explains nothing about an evening and reveals a great deal about a man who reaches for that comparison. The shift from illuminating the object to exposing the perceiver is the whole of modernist imagery. It now reveals the observer rather than the subject

  7. Why is A Vision optional for reading "The Second Coming"?
    Show the full solution

    Because everything that works in the poem is legible without it: a falcon spiraling beyond hearing, a center that will not hold, the best without conviction and the worst with intensity, and a beast that slouches rather than strides. The gyre explains where Yeats got the shape and does not explain why the poem still functions for readers who have never heard of the system. The images work without it, which is why it survives

  8. State an honest position on Achebe's objection to Conrad.
    Show the full solution

    The frame creates distance and does not create a counter-voice. Marlow's account reaches the reader at two removes through an unnamed listener, so the novella can present his views without endorsing them. But no African character speaks at length or is named, so the structure that complicates Marlow leaves Achebe's central objection standing. An essay should hold both. The frame distances Marlow and supplies no African voice

  9. What replaces plot in Mrs Dalloway?
    Show the full solution

    A single day, shared public events, and movement between minds without announcement. Big Ben's "leaden circles dissolved in the air" returns throughout, heard by different characters in different states, so people who never meet are joined by simultaneity rather than causation. Clarissa learns of Septimus's death at her party, at second hand, and that is the book's only junction. A day, shared events, and unannounced movement between minds

  10. What do Brooke, Sassoon and Owen show read in order?
    Show the full solution

    A vocabulary being dismantled by the people using it. Brooke writes a decorous Petrarchan sonnet containing no physical fact about war, Sassoon turns a jaunty rhymed measure against his own side's staff, and Owen describes young soldiers as aged paupers and names the Horace line the old Lie, printing it in Latin so readers must translate their own inheritance. A vocabulary dismantled in four years by its own users

Lesson 6.1 · Unit 6 · W.11-12.7, RL.11-12.9

What makes two texts worth putting together

A comparative essay is not two essays sharing a title. It exists because putting two texts beside each other produces a conclusion neither would yield alone, and most weak comparisons fail because no such conclusion was ever available.

The key ideas
  1. A comparison needs a third term, which is the question both texts answer.
  2. Similarity alone is not a finding, since two poems about death being about death establishes nothing.
  3. The productive pattern is a shared problem with different solutions, which makes the difference meaningful.
  4. The texts must be close enough to compare and different enough that the comparison costs something.
  5. Influence and analogy are different claims, and the first requires evidence of contact.
  6. A period gap is an asset, provided the essay explains what the gap accounts for.
  7. The question should be answerable from the texts, not from biography or from reputation.
  8. Test the pairing by drafting the conclusion first, and discard it if the conclusion is obvious.

Where students lose marks: choosing texts that are too similar. If both poets do roughly the same thing, the essay becomes a list of parallels and has nothing to argue.

Worked example

The task. Test four candidate pairings from this course and keep the one that can produce an argument.

Step one: reject a pairing that is too close. Wordsworth and Coleridge on nature. They collaborated on one book, shared a theory and lived in the same valley. The essay would be a list of agreements.

Step two: reject a pairing with no third term. Beowulf and Mrs Dalloway. Both are in English. There is no question both answer, so the essay would have to invent one and would spend its length justifying the pairing.

Step three: reject a pairing whose conclusion is obvious. Brooke and Owen on war. The answer is that Owen saw combat and Brooke did not, everyone knows it, and the essay would restate the received view at length.

Step four: identify a pairing that works. Pope's Rape of the Lock and Eliot's Prufrock. Both use an inherited elevated form for a subject the form was not designed for, and both are about a man in a drawing room who does not act.

Step five: state the third term. The question is what happens to an epic or heroic register when it is applied to a modern social life with no heroic action available. Both texts answer it and they answer it differently.

Step six: state the difference that makes it an argument. Pope's mock epic judges the society from outside, using the form as a measure it fails to meet. Eliot's speaker is inside the failure and uses the elevated register on himself, so there is no external standard left.

Step seven: draft the conclusion before researching. "Both poems apply a heroic register to trivial social life, but Pope keeps the register as a standard the society falls short of, while Eliot's speaker has internalized it as self-accusation, which marks the loss of any position from which to judge." Disputable, and arguable either way.

Step eight: state the test. A pairing works when the conclusion would be false of either text alone. Neither poem by itself establishes that claim, and that is the definition of a comparison worth writing.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. What is the third term in a comparison?
    Show the full solution

    The question both texts answer

  2. Why is similarity alone not a finding?
    Show the full solution

    Because it establishes nothing an essay can argue

  3. What is the productive pattern for a pairing?
    Show the full solution

    A shared problem with different solutions

  4. How do influence and analogy differ?
    Show the full solution

    Influence requires evidence of contact; analogy does not

  5. How should a pairing be tested?
    Show the full solution

    By drafting the conclusion first and discarding it if it is obvious

  6. Why reject Wordsworth and Coleridge on nature?
    Show the full solution

    They are too close. The two collaborated on one book, shared a theory of poetry and lived in the same valley, so an essay comparing them would be a list of agreements. A comparison needs the texts to be different enough that the difference costs something to explain. They agree too much to produce an argument

  7. Why reject Beowulf and Mrs Dalloway?
    Show the full solution

    There is no third term. The only shared property is the language, so no question is answered by both, and the essay would have to invent a question and then spend its length justifying the pairing rather than arguing anything. Distance alone is not a reason to compare. No shared question, so nothing to compare about

  8. Why reject Brooke and Owen on war?
    Show the full solution

    The conclusion is obvious. Everyone knows that Owen saw combat and Brooke did not, so the essay would restate the received view at length without adding to it. A pairing whose answer is already common knowledge gives evidence nothing to do. The answer is already the received view

  9. What makes Pope and Eliot a working pair?
    Show the full solution

    Both apply an inherited elevated register to modern social life with no heroic action available, and both put a man in a drawing room who does not act. The shared problem is real and the solutions differ: Pope keeps the register as an external standard, and Eliot's speaker has internalized it as self-accusation. That difference is an argument. A shared problem answered two different ways

  10. State the test for a comparison worth writing.
    Show the full solution

    The conclusion would be false of either text alone. If the claim can be established from one poem, the second is decoration, and if it cannot be established from either, the pairing has produced something neither could yield. That is the definition of a comparison that has earned its structure. Neither text alone could support the conclusion

Lesson 6.2 · Unit 6 · RL.11-12.9, RI.11-12.8

A tool, not an explanation

This course has used period labels for six units, and they are useful. They are also retrospective inventions, and the commonest fault in a comparative essay is treating a label as though it caused something.

The key ideas
  1. Period labels are retrospective, and almost nobody described themselves as a Romantic or a Victorian.
  2. Modernist is the exception, since several of those writers did use the term about themselves.
  3. The boundaries are conventions, and 1798 and 1837 are chosen for convenience rather than discovered.
  4. Writers overlap the boundaries, and Hardy published poems in 1928 while being called a Victorian.
  5. A label describes a tendency, not a rule that every text of the period obeys.
  6. Explaining by label is circular, since calling a poem Romantic because it is Romantic explains nothing.
  7. The legitimate use is orientation, telling a reader what conventions were available to a writer.
  8. The most interesting texts are usually exceptions to the label applied to them.

Where students lose marks: writing that a text does something "because it is Victorian". Replace the label with the specific condition: a readership, a format, a controversy, a technique that had just become available.

Worked example

The task. Convert three label-based explanations from this course into explanations that actually explain.

Step one: take a weak sentence. "Dickens's novels are long and full of subplots because he was a Victorian." Nothing has been explained; a period name has been put where a cause should be.

Step two: replace it with the condition. "Dickens's novels are long and full of subplots because they were sold in monthly thirty-two-page numbers over nineteen months, which required each installment to end on a hook and no thread to go cold for four weeks." Now something has been said.

Step three: take a second weak sentence. "Eliot writes in fragments because he is a modernist." Circular in the same way: the label was derived from the practice it is being used to explain.

Step four: replace it. "Eliot writes in fragments because he is making a claim that no continuous account of the postwar world is available, and because juxtaposition transfers the work of connection to the reader." That is a claim about purpose and technique rather than about membership.

Step five: take a third. "Wordsworth writes about ordinary people because Romanticism valued the common man." Replace with the document: "because the preface of 1800 argues that the essential passions are less restrained in low and rustic life, a premise Coleridge later disputed."

Step six: notice what each replacement did. Substituted a format, a purpose, or a stated argument for a category. Each replacement is checkable and the label was not.

Step seven: state the legitimate use of a label. Orientation. Saying a poem is a Petrarchan sonnet written in the 1590s tells a reader what conventions were available, and that is genuine information about constraint rather than a cause.

Step eight: state what the exceptions are for. Hardy published poems in 1928 and is called a Victorian; Yeats began in 1889 and is called a modernist. The writers who straddle a boundary show that the boundary is a convenience, and they are usually the most productive subjects for a comparative essay.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Are period labels contemporary or retrospective?
    Show the full solution

    Retrospective, with modernist as a partial exception

  2. What does a label describe?
    Show the full solution

    A tendency, not a rule

  3. Why is explaining by label circular?
    Show the full solution

    The label was derived from the practice it is used to explain

  4. What is the legitimate use of a period label?
    Show the full solution

    Orientation: telling a reader what conventions were available

  5. Give an example of a writer who straddles a boundary.
    Show the full solution

    Hardy, publishing poems in 1928 while called a Victorian

  6. Rewrite: "Dickens's novels are long because he was a Victorian."
    Show the full solution

    They are long and full of subplots because they were sold in monthly thirty-two-page numbers across nineteen months, which required each installment to end on a hook and no thread to go cold for four weeks. The revision names a format and its requirements, which is checkable, where the label was not. Name the serial format and what it required

  7. Rewrite: "Eliot writes in fragments because he is a modernist."
    Show the full solution

    He writes in fragments because he is claiming that no continuous account of the postwar world is available, and because juxtaposition transfers the work of connection to the reader. That is a claim about purpose and technique rather than about membership in a category derived from the practice itself. Name the purpose and the effect on the reader

  8. Rewrite: "Wordsworth writes about ordinary people because Romanticism valued the common man."
    Show the full solution

    He writes about them because the preface of 1800 argues that the essential passions are less restrained in low and rustic life, a premise Coleridge later disputed in Biographia Literaria. The revision cites a document and an objection, so the claim can be checked and contested. Cite the preface's stated premise and the objection to it

  9. What do all three replacements have in common?
    Show the full solution

    Each substitutes a format, a purpose or a stated argument for a category, and each replacement is checkable where the label was not. The general move is to ask what specific condition the label is standing in for, and then to write that instead. They replace a category with a checkable condition

  10. Why are boundary-straddling writers useful for comparative essays?
    Show the full solution

    Because they show the boundary is a convenience. Hardy published poems in 1928 and is called a Victorian; Yeats began in 1889 and is called a modernist. A writer who does not fit forces the essay to explain by conditions rather than by membership, which is exactly what a strong comparison does anyway. They force explanation by condition rather than by category

Lesson 6.3 · Unit 6 · W.11-12.8, RI.11-12.8

Finding criticism, and judging it

The criticism on the texts in this course is enormous and most of it is not on the open web. Finding it takes the right tools, and using it means judging arguments made by people who know far more than you do, which is a skill worth naming.

The key ideas
  1. Most criticism sits in library databases such as JSTOR and Project MUSE, reachable with a public library card.
  2. Read abstracts before articles, since ten abstracts take the time of one article.
  3. Mine bibliographies, because a good article cites what its author had to answer.
  4. Check the date, since criticism has periods and a 1950s reading rests on assumptions later scholars rejected.
  5. Note the approach: formalist, historicist, feminist, postcolonial and others ask different questions.
  6. An edition is a scholarly decision, and this matters especially for Shakespeare and Dickinson.
  7. Disagreeing is permitted when the disagreement is argued from the primary text.
  8. Encyclopedias and study guides are leads, never citations.

Where students lose marks: treating published criticism as settled. It is an argument, and a student who can quote a text accurately may say where a critic has read it wrongly.

Worked example

The task. Build a search for the Pope and Eliot comparison, then evaluate what comes back.

Step one: search at three widths. Narrow: "Rape of the Lock mock epic". Conceptual: "mock heroic modern poetry". Cross-period: "Pope Eliot influence". Three searches, not one, because a single phrasing finds only what is phrased that way.

Step two: search where criticism lives. A library database rather than a general web search, since the latter returns study guides ahead of scholarship almost every time.

Step three: read ten abstracts. Most will be irrelevant, which is the normal ratio. An abstract states a claim in a paragraph, so a student can triage a field in an hour.

Step four: mine one good bibliography. An article on Eliot's use of eighteenth-century satire will cite the work its author had to answer, and those citations reach material no keyword search would have surfaced.

Step five: check the date and the approach. A 1955 article on Prufrock is likely to be formalist, treating the poem as a self-contained object and declining to discuss its social setting. That is not worthless; it answers a question the student may not be asking.

Step six: check the edition when it matters. Which text of Hamlet a critic is using changes what is available to quote, since the first quarto, the second quarto and the folio differ substantially. An essay should name its edition for exactly this reason.

Step seven: find a disagreement that is checkable. If a critic writes that Prufrock never refers to any literary figure, the Hamlet passage contradicts it. A verifiable error about the text is legitimate grounds to disagree with anybody.

Step eight: write the disagreement properly. Name the critic, state the claim in its strongest form, quote the passage that contradicts it, and say what follows for your argument. Disagreement is argued and cited, never announced.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Name two databases holding literary criticism.
    Show the full solution

    JSTOR and Project MUSE

  2. What should be read before a full article?
    Show the full solution

    The abstract

  3. Name four critical approaches.
    Show the full solution

    Formalist, historicist, feminist, postcolonial

  4. What is required before disagreeing with a critic?
    Show the full solution

    An argument from the primary text

  5. How should a study guide be used?
    Show the full solution

    As a lead, never as a citation

  6. Why search at three widths?
    Show the full solution

    Because a single phrasing finds only what happens to be phrased that way. "Rape of the Lock mock epic" is narrow, "mock heroic modern poetry" is conceptual, and "Pope Eliot influence" crosses periods, and each surfaces different scholarship. Research is several searches at different widths rather than one lucky one. One phrasing finds only what matches it

  7. Why is a bibliography better than another keyword search?
    Show the full solution

    Because a good article cites the work its author had to answer, so the bibliography is the field's own map of what matters. Scholars cite by argument rather than by the words a student happened to type, which is why those citations reach material no keyword search would surface. It maps what the field considers essential

  8. Why does the edition matter for a play?
    Show the full solution

    Because the texts differ substantially. The first quarto, second quarto and folio of Hamlet are not the same play, so which edition a critic uses changes what is available to quote and sometimes what a scene means. An essay should name its edition for that reason, not as a formality. Different editions of Hamlet are different texts

  9. What makes a disagreement with a critic legitimate?
    Show the full solution

    A checkable point about the text. If a critic writes that Prufrock never refers to a literary figure and the poem contains the Hamlet passage, the claim is factually wrong and a student may say so. Disagreement grounded in what the page contains is always permitted, whatever the critic's standing. A verifiable claim the text contradicts

  10. How is a disagreement written?
    Show the full solution

    Name the critic, state the claim in its strongest form, quote the passage that contradicts it, and say what follows for your own argument. Misstating the critic's position first makes the paragraph worthless even when the conclusion is right, and announcing disagreement without citing it is not an argument at all. Name, state fairly, quote, then draw the consequence

Lesson 6.4 · Unit 6 · W.11-12.2, W.11-12.5

Three structures for a comparison, and which to use

The structure of a comparative essay is a real decision with real consequences. There are three available, one of them is usually wrong, and choosing before drafting saves a complete rewrite later.

The key ideas
  1. Block structure treats text A completely, then text B, then compares.
  2. Alternating structure moves point by point, taking both texts under each heading.
  3. Integrated structure organizes by the argument, with either text appearing wherever the claim needs it.
  4. Block is the weakest because the comparison is postponed to the end.
  5. Alternating is reliable and can become mechanical if every section has the same shape.
  6. Integrated is strongest and requires the clearest thesis to hold together.
  7. The introduction states the third term, not a summary of each text.
  8. The conclusion states what the pairing produced, which is the thing neither text alone could show.

Where students lose marks: block structure. If a reader reaches page five before the two texts meet, the essay has spent most of its length on two separate summaries.

Worked example

The task. Outline the Pope and Eliot essay three ways and choose.

Step one: outline the block version. Introduction; four paragraphs on The Rape of the Lock; four on Prufrock; two comparing them; conclusion. The comparison begins on page five.

Step two: state what goes wrong. The reader has to hold four paragraphs of Pope in memory while reading four of Eliot, and the essay's actual argument occupies two paragraphs out of eleven. Most of the length is summary.

Step three: outline the alternating version. Introduction; then sections on the inherited form, the drawing-room setting, the failure to act, and the ending, each taking Pope then Eliot; conclusion. The comparison begins in paragraph two.

Step four: state its weakness. Every section has the same shape, so the essay becomes predictable, and the sections can end up equally weighted even when one point is far more important than another.

Step five: outline the integrated version. Introduction stating the third term; a paragraph establishing that both use an elevated register; two paragraphs on Pope's external standard, drawing on Eliot for contrast; three on Eliot's internalization, drawing on Pope; a paragraph on what the shift costs; conclusion.

Step six: state why it is strongest. The paragraphs are organized by the argument rather than by the texts, so each one advances a claim and calls on whichever poem it needs. The weighting follows the importance of the points rather than a template.

Step seven: state what it demands. A thesis clear enough to organize everything. Without one, the integrated structure becomes a jumble, which is why the block version is the safe choice for a student who has not yet settled the argument.

Step eight: write the introduction correctly. It states the third term: what happens to an elevated register applied to modern social life. It does not summarize either poem, because the reader does not need plot before they need the question.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Name the three structures.
    Show the full solution

    Block, alternating, integrated

  2. What does block structure do?
    Show the full solution

    Treats one text fully, then the other, then compares

  3. What organizes an integrated essay?
    Show the full solution

    The argument, with either text appearing where the claim needs it

  4. What should the introduction state?
    Show the full solution

    The third term, not a summary of each text

  5. What should the conclusion state?
    Show the full solution

    What the pairing produced that neither text alone could show

  6. Why is block structure weak?
    Show the full solution

    Because the comparison is postponed to the end. In an eleven-paragraph essay the argument occupies two paragraphs and the other nine are two separate summaries, and the reader must hold four paragraphs of one text in memory while reading four of the other. Most of the length does no comparative work. The comparison occupies a fraction of the essay

  7. What is the risk of alternating structure?
    Show the full solution

    Predictability and false weighting. Every section takes the same shape, text A then text B, so the essay becomes mechanical, and the sections tend to end up equally sized even when one point matters far more than another. It is reliable rather than strong. It becomes mechanical and weights points equally

  8. Why is integrated structure strongest?
    Show the full solution

    Because the paragraphs are organized by the argument rather than by the texts, so each one advances a claim and calls on whichever poem it needs. The weighting follows the importance of the points rather than a template, and the reader is never asked to store evidence for later use. Paragraphs advance claims and call on either text as needed

  9. What does integrated structure demand?
    Show the full solution

    A thesis clear enough to organize everything. Without one the structure becomes a jumble, since nothing dictates what belongs in which paragraph. That is why block structure remains the safe choice for a student who has not yet settled the argument, even though it is the weakest of the three. A thesis firm enough to dictate every paragraph

  10. Why should the introduction not summarize the texts?
    Show the full solution

    Because the reader needs the question before they need the plot. Stating the third term, what happens to an elevated register applied to modern social life, tells them what to look for, and summary delivered first is information they cannot yet use. Plot belongs where the argument requires it. The reader needs the question before the material

Lesson 6.5 · Unit 6 · RL.11-12.4, W.11-12.9

Close reading as the engine of comparison

A comparative essay stands or falls on its evidence, and in literary study evidence means quotation analyzed closely. A comparison built from summaries is an assertion with examples attached.

The key ideas
  1. Close reading means analyzing a short passage in detail.
  2. The units of analysis are diction, syntax, sound, imagery, meter and form.
  3. Diction means word choice, including register, etymology and connotation.
  4. Syntax means sentence structure, including length, order and what is delayed.
  5. A comparison needs matched passages, short enough to be analyzed and genuinely parallel.
  6. Quote short and embed, putting the quotation inside your own sentence.
  7. A block quotation runs over four lines and is indented without quotation marks.
  8. Verse quotations use a slash for the line break when they run on.

Where students lose marks: quoting long passages and commenting generally. Four words analyzed for three sentences is worth more than four lines summarized in one.

Worked example

The task. Build one comparative paragraph from two short quotations.

Step one: choose matched passages. From Pope: "Or stain her honour, or her new brocade." From Eliot: "I have measured out my life with coffee spoons." Both are one line, both join a life to an object.

Step two: analyze the Pope line's syntax. Two parallel clauses joined by "or", with the serious term first and the trivial one in the rhyme position. The meter weights the brocade.

Step three: state what that establishes. The equivalence belongs to Belinda's society, not to the poet. Pope is standing outside the valuation and reporting it, which the couplet's judgment makes audible.

Step four: analyze Eliot's verb. "Measured out." It is a pharmacist's or a cook's phrase, exact and small, and it is applied to a life. The measuring instrument is then named, and it is a coffee spoon.

Step five: state what that establishes. The speaker performs the reduction himself. There is no external voice noting that his life has been small; he supplies both the observation and the metaphor, in the first person.

Step six: write the comparative sentence. "Pope's couplet places a reputation beside a dress and lets the rhyme deliver the verdict, while Eliot's speaker measures his own life in coffee spoons, so the judgment that Pope makes from outside has become, in Eliot, something the subject performs on himself."

Step seven: state what makes the sentence comparative. It names a shared operation, the pairing of a life with a trivial object, and locates the difference in who performs it. The difference is the argument.

Step eight: check the length of the quotations. One line each, ten words total, supporting a paragraph of analysis. That ratio is right. Two block quotations followed by a sentence of commentary would be the same material doing a tenth of the work.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Name six units of close reading.
    Show the full solution

    Diction, syntax, sound, imagery, meter, form

  2. Define diction and syntax.
    Show the full solution

    Word choice, and sentence structure

  3. When is a quotation set as a block?
    Show the full solution

    When it runs over four lines

  4. How is a line break marked in a run-on verse quotation?
    Show the full solution

    With a slash

  5. What makes two passages matched?
    Show the full solution

    They are short, genuinely parallel, and both analyzable

  6. Analyze the syntax of Pope's line.
    Show the full solution

    Two parallel clauses joined by "or", with the serious term first and the trivial one in the rhyme position, so the meter's strongest emphasis falls on the brocade rather than the honor. The equivalence belongs to Belinda's society and the couplet's weighting is how Pope reports it without stating it. Parallel clauses with the meter weighting the trivial

  7. Analyze Eliot's verb.
    Show the full solution

    "Measured out" is a pharmacist's or a cook's phrase, exact and small, applied to a life, and the instrument named is a coffee spoon. The speaker performs the reduction himself, supplying both the observation and the metaphor in the first person, with no external voice required. A small precise verb, applied by the speaker to his own life

  8. What makes the comparative sentence comparative?
    Show the full solution

    It names a shared operation, the pairing of a life with a trivial object, and locates the difference in who performs it: Pope judges from outside and Eliot's speaker judges himself. The difference is the argument, and a sentence that stated only the similarity would have nothing to prove. It names the shared operation and locates the difference

  9. Why is the quotation-to-analysis ratio important?
    Show the full solution

    Because ten words supporting a paragraph of analysis does ten times the work of two block quotations followed by a sentence of commentary. Long quotations occupy the space where the argument should be, and a reader cannot tell which part of a four-line block the writer meant. Four words analyzed for three sentences is the right shape. Short quotations carry more argument per line

  10. Why is a comparison built from summaries weak?
    Show the full solution

    Because it is an assertion with examples attached rather than an argument from evidence. Summary states what a text is about and cannot show how it works, so any claim about technique, tone or effect is left unsupported. In literary study the evidence is the language, and summary discards it. Summary cannot support claims about how a text works

Lesson 6.6 · Unit 6 · W.11-12.1, RL.11-12.1

Warranting a comparative claim

A comparison has all the requirements of an ordinary literary argument plus one more. It needs a warrant for each text and a further warrant explaining why the two belong in the same paragraph, and the second is the one students omit.

The key ideas
  1. A claim is the arguable sentence a paragraph defends.
  2. Evidence is the quotation or specific detail.
  3. A warrant is the reasoning connecting evidence to claim.
  4. A comparative paragraph needs three warrants: one per text, and one for the juxtaposition.
  5. The comparative warrant answers why these two things being different matters.
  6. False equivalence is the commonest comparative error, treating two things as parallel when they are not.
  7. Counterargument in a comparison is usually the claim that the pairing is arbitrary.
  8. Conceding the disanalogy is stronger than pretending the texts fit perfectly.

Where students lose marks: the missing third warrant. Two well-analyzed passages in one paragraph is not a comparison until a sentence explains what their difference establishes.

Worked example

The task. Build one fully warranted comparative paragraph and then answer the strongest objection to it.

Step one: write the claim. "The shift from Pope to Eliot is the disappearance of a position from which trivial social life can be judged." Arguable, specific, and the paragraph now has something to prove.

Step two: give the first evidence and warrant. Pope's "Or stain her honour, or her new brocade" places the trivial item in the rhyme position, so the couplet's strongest emphasis falls on the dress. The form performs a judgment the poet does not state, which requires a standard the poet holds and the society does not.

Step three: give the second evidence and warrant. Eliot's "I have measured out my life with coffee spoons" puts the same reduction in the first person. The speaker supplies both the measurement and the instrument, so no external standard is invoked anywhere.

Step four: write the comparative warrant. "In Pope the mismatch between the heroic form and the trivial subject is the instrument of judgment; in Eliot the speaker has absorbed the judgment, so the mismatch no longer measures him against anything. What has gone is not the standard's content but its location."

Step five: state what that third sentence did. It explained why the difference matters. Without it the paragraph is two good close readings sharing a page, and a reader would have to construct the argument themselves.

Step six: state the strongest objection. That the pairing is arbitrary, since two centuries and a change of genre separate them and no evidence of influence has been offered. That is the counterargument every comparative essay must answer.

Step seven: concede the disanalogy. "The essay claims no influence, and Eliot's poem is not a satire. The comparison is analogical, and it rests on a shared formal situation rather than on a line of descent."

Step eight: turn the concession into the argument. "That the same formal situation produces opposite effects two centuries apart is what makes the pair informative: a technique is not a fixed quantity, and what mock-heroic registers do depends on whether a reader still has somewhere to stand." The concession strengthens the paragraph rather than weakening it.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. Name the three parts of a literary argument.
    Show the full solution

    Claim, evidence, warrant

  2. How many warrants does a comparative paragraph need?
    Show the full solution

    Three: one per text and one for the juxtaposition

  3. What is false equivalence?
    Show the full solution

    Treating two things as parallel when they are not

  4. What is the usual counterargument to a comparison?
    Show the full solution

    That the pairing is arbitrary

  5. What should be done with a genuine disanalogy?
    Show the full solution

    Concede it, rather than pretending the texts fit perfectly

  6. What does the comparative warrant have to answer?
    Show the full solution

    Why the difference between the two texts matters. It is not enough to establish that Pope judges from outside and Eliot's speaker judges himself; the paragraph must say what follows from that, which here is that the standard's location has changed rather than its content. What follows from the difference

  7. What happens to a paragraph missing its third warrant?
    Show the full solution

    It becomes two good close readings sharing a page. The reader has to construct the comparative argument themselves, and different readers will construct different ones, so the paragraph proves nothing in particular. It is the commonest failure in comparative writing and the easiest to fix. It is two readings, not a comparison

  8. State the arbitrariness objection at full strength.
    Show the full solution

    Two centuries and a change of genre separate the poems, no evidence of influence has been offered, and a satirical mock epic and a modernist dramatic monologue are doing fundamentally different jobs. Any two texts can be made to share an abstraction if the abstraction is loose enough. Stated weakly, this objection cannot be answered convincingly. Distance, genre difference, and no evidence of contact

  9. How is the objection conceded without surrender?
    Show the full solution

    By stating plainly that the essay claims no influence and that Eliot's poem is not a satire, and that the comparison is analogical, resting on a shared formal situation rather than a line of descent. Conceding the factual content of the objection while denying its conclusion is stronger than disputing facts a reader can check. Grant the facts and restate the comparison as analogical

  10. How does the concession become the argument?
    Show the full solution

    Because the same formal situation producing opposite effects two centuries apart is precisely what makes the pair informative: a technique is not a fixed quantity, and what a mock-heroic register does depends on whether the reader still has somewhere to stand. The distance the objection complained of is the finding. The distance the objection names is what the essay is about

Lesson 6.7 · Unit 6 · W.11-12.8

MLA for poetry, drama and multiple editions

MLA's general rules are simple and its rules for verse and drama are different from its rules for prose. A comparative essay on poetry and plays will use those exceptions on nearly every page, so they are worth learning once.

The key ideas
  1. MLA is the humanities citation style, currently in its ninth edition.
  2. Prose is cited by page, in parentheses with no comma and no "p.".
  3. Poetry is cited by line, using the word "line" or "lines" in the first citation and numbers thereafter.
  4. Verse drama is cited by act, scene and line, separated by periods, as in 3.1.56-60.
  5. Up to three lines of verse run on with a slash between them, and a double slash between stanzas.
  6. Four or more lines are set as a block, indented, without quotation marks.
  7. The edition is named in the Works Cited entry, and it must be the same edition throughout.
  8. Two works by one author are distinguished in the citation by a short title.

Where students lose marks: citing poetry by page. A poem has lines and the page number is an accident of the book, so a reader with a different edition cannot find your evidence.

Worked example

The task. Cite the sources a Pope and Eliot essay would use.

Step one: cite prose. (Woolf 42). Author and page, no comma, no "p.", and the period follows the parenthesis.

Step two: cite poetry the first time. Pope pairs honor with "her new brocade" (lines 107-08). The word "lines" appears in the first citation so the reader knows the numbers are not pages.

Step three: cite poetry thereafter. (109-10). Once the unit is established the numbers stand alone, which keeps the parentheses short in an essay that will contain dozens of them.

Step four: cite verse drama. Hamlet calls death "the undiscovered country" (3.1.81). Act, scene and line separated by periods, with no commas and no abbreviations.

Step five: run on two lines of verse. Eliot's evening is "spread out against the sky / Like a patient etherised upon a table" (lines 2-3). A slash with a space on each side marks the line break.

Step six: handle two works by one author. (Eliot, Waste Land 60) and (Eliot, "Prufrock" 51). A short title distinguishes them, italicized for a long work and in quotation marks for a short one.

Step seven: build the Works Cited entries. Pope, Alexander. "The Rape of the Lock." The Poems of Alexander Pope, edited by John Butt, Yale UP, 1963, pp. 217-42. Author, title of source, title of container, other contributors, publisher, date, location.

Step eight: state the edition rule. Use one edition of each text throughout, name it in the Works Cited, and never mix editions of a play. A reader checking 3.1.81 in a different text of Hamlet may find a different line, which is why the entry does real work rather than being a formality.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. How is prose cited?
    Show the full solution

    By author and page, with no comma and no "p."

  2. How is poetry cited?
    Show the full solution

    By line, with "line" or "lines" in the first citation

  3. How is verse drama cited?
    Show the full solution

    Act, scene and line separated by periods

  4. When does a verse quotation become a block?
    Show the full solution

    At four or more lines

  5. How are two works by one author distinguished?
    Show the full solution

    By a short title in the citation

  6. Why must poetry be cited by line rather than page?
    Show the full solution

    Because a page number is an accident of the book and a line number belongs to the poem. A reader with a different edition cannot find evidence cited by page, whereas line 107 of The Rape of the Lock is line 107 in every printing. The citation exists to let a reader check you. Line numbers are stable across editions; pages are not

  7. Why does the first poetry citation include the word "lines"?
    Show the full solution

    So the reader knows the numbers are not pages. After that the unit is established and bare numbers are unambiguous, which keeps the parentheses short in an essay that will contain dozens of them. The rule trades one word of clarity at the start for brevity throughout. It establishes the unit so later citations can be bare

  8. Write the citation for two run-on lines of verse.
    Show the full solution

    Eliot's evening is "spread out against the sky / Like a patient etherised upon a table" (lines 2-3). A slash with a space on either side marks the line break, the quotation stays inside the sentence, and the parenthesis precedes the period. Three lines may run on this way; four require a block. A spaced slash marks the break, and the citation follows

  9. Why does the edition entry do real work for a play?
    Show the full solution

    Because the texts of Hamlet differ substantially between the first quarto, the second quarto and the folio, so a reader checking 3.1.81 in a different edition may find a different line or none at all. Naming the edition is what makes an act-scene-line citation verifiable rather than approximate. Different editions of a play number different lines

  10. Give the order of the MLA core elements.
    Show the full solution

    Author, title of source, title of container, other contributors, version, number, publisher, publication date, location. Every entry is these nine in that order, skipping what does not apply, which is why one procedure handles a poem in an anthology, an article in a journal and a format nobody has invented yet. Author, source, container, contributors, version, number, publisher, date, location

Lesson 6.8 · Unit 6 · W.11-12.5, W.11-12.10

The capstone, planned, drafted and revised

The capstone is a documented comparative essay across two periods of this course, and it is the last piece of work in the diploma track. This lesson is the schedule, the checklist and the revision routine, in that order.

The key ideas
  1. The capstone compares two texts from different units, in eight to twelve pages with four to eight secondary sources.
  2. Plan across four weeks: question, research, draft, revise.
  3. Revision changes the argument; editing changes the sentences; proofreading catches errors.
  4. The reverse outline is one sentence per paragraph, written after the draft and read as a list.
  5. Check the thesis against the paper you wrote, and change the thesis when the paper is better.
  6. Every paragraph needs its warrants, including the comparative one.
  7. Check every quotation against the source, since transcription errors are common.
  8. Rewrite the introduction last, so it promises what the essay delivers.

Where students lose marks: revising a paper whose thesis no longer matches its body. The argument usually improves while drafting, and the introduction is normally the last thing that should be rewritten.

Worked example

The task. Run the four-week schedule and then the three-pass revision on the Pope and Eliot capstone.

Step one: week one, the question. Choose the pairing, apply the test from lesson 6.1, draft the conclusion before researching, and write a provisional thesis. End the week with one disputable sentence.

Step two: week two, research. Three searches at different widths, ten abstracts, four to eight sources read, bibliographies mined. Every note marked as quotation, paraphrase or your own thought, with full source details recorded at first use.

Step three: week three, the draft. Choose the structure from lesson 6.4, outline by claim, and write straight through without stopping to polish. A draft exists to be revised, and time spent perfecting a paragraph that will be cut is time lost.

Step four: week four, revision in three passes. Argument, then sources, then sentences, in that order, because polishing a paragraph you will cut is wasted work.

Step five: run the argument pass. Build the reverse outline, one sentence per paragraph stating what it claims rather than what it discusses. Read the list for duplication, for sequence, and for whether the thesis still matches.

Step six: check the comparative warrants specifically. Find every paragraph containing both texts and confirm there is a sentence saying what their difference establishes. This is the pass that distinguishes a comparative essay from two essays interleaved.

Step seven: run the source pass. Open every source and check each quotation word by word, every line number, every act-scene-line reference, and the two-way match between citations and Works Cited entries.

Step eight: run the sentence pass and rewrite the introduction. Read aloud to catch what the eye skips. Then write the introduction last, stating the third term and promising what the essay now delivers, which is the single most effective revision move available.

Practice · 10 questions

Questions 1 to 5 are recall. Questions 6 to 10 ask for reasoning.

  1. What does the capstone require?
    Show the full solution

    A comparison of two texts from different units, eight to twelve pages, four to eight secondary sources

  2. Name the four weeks of the plan.
    Show the full solution

    Question, research, draft, revise

  3. Distinguish revision, editing and proofreading.
    Show the full solution

    Revision changes the argument, editing changes the sentences, proofreading catches errors

  4. What is a reverse outline?
    Show the full solution

    One sentence per paragraph, written after the draft and read as a list

  5. When is the introduction written?
    Show the full solution

    Last

  6. Why must the three passes run in that order?
    Show the full solution

    Because polishing a paragraph you will cut is wasted work. Structural decisions determine which sentences survive, so the argument pass comes first, the source pass second and the sentence pass last. A student who proofreads before revising spends their most careful hours on material that leaves the essay. Structure decides which sentences survive

  7. What should each reverse-outline sentence state?
    Show the full solution

    What the paragraph claims, not what it discusses. "This paragraph is about Prufrock's self-description" is a topic; "Eliot's speaker performs the reduction Pope performs on his characters" is a claim. Only the second form lets a reader see whether the essay has an argument or a sequence of subjects. Its claim, never its topic

  8. Why is there a dedicated pass for comparative warrants?
    Show the full solution

    Because the missing third warrant is the commonest failure in comparative writing and it is invisible while drafting. Finding every paragraph that contains both texts and confirming there is a sentence saying what their difference establishes is what distinguishes a comparative essay from two essays interleaved. It is the failure that makes the essay stop being comparative

  9. What does the source pass check?
    Show the full solution

    Every quotation word by word against the original, every line number and act-scene-line reference, and the two-way match between in-text citations and Works Cited entries. Transcription errors are common and invisible to the writer, who remembers what a source meant rather than what it said, which is why the pass is mechanical and done with the sources open. Wording, references, and the two-way citation match

  10. Why is rewriting the introduction last the most effective move?
    Show the full solution

    Because the argument usually improves while drafting, so the essay ends up arguing something the first draft did not know it would argue. Writing the introduction after the body means it can state the third term accurately and promise exactly what the essay delivers, which repairs the commonest structural complaint a reader has. It can promise what the finished essay actually does

Unit 6 review · Comparison and the Capstone

Ten questions across the whole unit

Questions 1 to 5 check that you hold the terms. Questions 6 to 10 require you to reason across the eight lessons.

  1. What is the third term in a comparison?
    Show the full solution

    The question both texts answer

  2. Name the three structures a comparative essay can take.
    Show the full solution

    Block, alternating, integrated

  3. How many warrants does a comparative paragraph need?
    Show the full solution

    Three: one per text and one for the juxtaposition

  4. How is verse drama cited in MLA?
    Show the full solution

    Act, scene and line separated by periods

  5. Name the four weeks of the capstone plan.
    Show the full solution

    Question, research, draft, revise

  6. State the test for a comparison worth writing.
    Show the full solution

    The conclusion would be false of either text alone. If the claim can be established from one text, the second is decoration; if it cannot be established from either, the pairing has produced something neither could yield. Draft the conclusion before researching and discard the pairing if the answer is obvious. Neither text alone could support the conclusion

  7. Rewrite "Dickens's novels are long because he was a Victorian" so that it explains.
    Show the full solution

    They are long and full of subplots because they were sold in monthly thirty-two-page numbers across nineteen months, which required each installment to end on a hook and no thread to go cold for four weeks. A period label is not a cause, and the general move is to ask what specific condition the label stands in for and write that instead. Name the serial format and what it required

  8. Why is integrated structure the strongest, and what does it demand?
    Show the full solution

    Its paragraphs are organized by the argument rather than by the texts, so each one advances a claim and calls on whichever text it needs, and the weighting follows the importance of the points rather than a template. It demands a thesis clear enough to dictate every paragraph, without which it becomes a jumble. It follows the argument, and needs a thesis firm enough to organize it

  9. What happens to a comparative paragraph missing its third warrant?
    Show the full solution

    It becomes two good close readings sharing a page. The reader has to construct the comparative argument themselves and different readers will construct different ones, so the paragraph proves nothing in particular. It is the commonest failure in comparative writing and the easiest to repair, which is why the capstone revision has a pass dedicated to it. It stops being a comparison

  10. Why is rewriting the introduction last the most effective revision move?
    Show the full solution

    Because the argument usually improves while drafting, so the essay ends up arguing something the first draft did not know it would argue. Writing the introduction afterward means it can state the third term accurately and promise exactly what the essay delivers, which repairs the commonest structural complaint a reader has. It can then promise what the finished essay actually does

Literary analysis 1 · 60 minutes

Read the poem below. Then write an essay analyzing how Browning uses the dramatic monologue to make the Duke convict himself.

Directions

You have sixty minutes. Begin with an arguable thesis. Quote briefly and often, and analyze each quotation rather than dropping it in.

Account for the listener. An essay that treats the poem as a soliloquy has missed the form.

The poem

Source: Robert Browning, "My Last Duchess", 1842. Public domain. The speaker is the Duke of Ferrara; the silent listener is an envoy sent to negotiate the Duke's next marriage. Browning's punctuation is reproduced as printed.

That's my last Duchess painted on the wall,
Looking as if she were alive. I call
That piece a wonder, now.

She had
A heart — how shall I say? — too soon made glad,
Too easily impressed; she liked whate'er
She looked on, and her looks went everywhere.

She thanked men, — good! but thanked
Somehow — I know not how — as if she ranked
My gift of a nine-hundred-years-old name
With anybody's gift.

Even had you skill
In speech — which I have not — to make your will
Quite clear to such an one, and say, "Just this
Or that in you disgusts me; here you miss,
Or there exceed the mark" — and if she let
Herself be lessoned so, nor plainly set
Her wits to yours, forsooth, and made excuse,
E'en then would be some stooping; and I choose
Never to stoop.

Oh sir, she smiled, no doubt,
Whene'er I passed her; but who passed without
Much the same smile? This grew; I gave commands;
Then all smiles stopped together. There she stands
As if alive.

Show a top-score response

Browning gives the Duke of Ferrara complete control of the poem and no awareness of what he is revealing, and the gap between those two facts is the whole work. Every detail the Duke offers as justification functions as testimony against him, and because he is speaking to a marriage broker rather than to a friend, the poem is not a confession but a negotiation. Reading it as a soliloquy loses the threat, which is its actual content.

The opening establishes the poem's central substitution. "That's my last Duchess painted on the wall, / Looking as if she were alive" introduces a woman as a painting, and the qualification "as if" arrives in the second line. The Duke then calls the piece "a wonder", crediting the artist. Within three lines a person has been converted into an object, evaluated, and attributed to a man. The poem's ending will repeat the phrase "as if alive", and by then the reader knows what it cost.

The complaint, when it arrives, is remarkably small. She was "too soon made glad", she "liked whate'er / She looked on", she thanked people. The Duke is describing a warm, ordinary young woman and presenting each quality as a defect, and Browning's arrangement means the reader hears the description and the accusation separately. Nothing the Duchess did requires explanation; the man explaining it does.

The hesitations are performances. "A heart — how shall I say? — too soon made glad" and "thanked / Somehow — I know not how" present a speaker searching for a fair formulation. He is not searching. He is fluent throughout, controls a long stretch of rhymed verse without stumbling, and manages his listener's movements at the end with complete assurance. The pauses are designed to make the accusation sound reluctant, which is itself an exercise of power.

The passage about speech is the poem's most self-incriminating and the one weak essays skip. He imagines telling her what displeased him, disclaims the skill to do it, and then states the real objection: "E'en then would be some stooping; and I choose / Never to stoop." He did not lack the ability to speak to his wife. He declined to, because explaining himself to her would have acknowledged her as someone who could be addressed. The murder follows from a refusal of conversation, and the Duke says so.

"My gift of a nine-hundred-years-old name" locates the grievance precisely. The offense was not infidelity, which he never alleges, but a failure of ranking. She valued his lineage at the same rate as a bough of cherries someone broke off for her. What the Duke cannot tolerate is a person who does not maintain the hierarchy, and that is a disposition, not an act, which is why nothing she could have done would have fixed it.

Then the four words the poem turns on. "This grew; I gave commands; / Then all smiles stopped together." The euphemism is complete and entirely transparent, which is itself a display: he can communicate a killing without naming it and be perfectly understood. It is placed mid-line, between two other topics, so the gravest statement in the poem receives no emphasis at all. The casualness is the characterization.

The listener is what makes all of this a threat rather than a memory. The envoy represents the family of the next duchess, so an account of what happened to the last one is a specification of terms. Immediately afterward the Duke raises the dowry, confident the Count's "known munificence" will meet his claim, and he perceives no discontinuity between the two subjects. Browning arranges the lines so the reader cannot miss the transition the speaker does not notice making.

The form completes the portrait. The poem is in rhymed couplets, the most controlled short form available, and almost no reader hears the rhymes on a first pass because the sense runs past every one of them. Total control presented as casual speech is exactly what the Duke does with his own conduct, so the verse is not a container for the characterization but a part of it.

Literary analysis 2 · 60 minutes

Read the passage below. Then write an essay analyzing how Keats uses paradox and unresolved argument to explore the relationship between art and experience.

Directions

You have sixty minutes. Begin with an arguable thesis and analyze at least one image, one piece of sound patterning and the poem's ending.

Attribute the final statement to its speaker. Essays that treat it as Keats's own conclusion will not score well.

The passage

Source: John Keats, "Ode on a Grecian Urn", 1819, stanzas 2 and 5. Public domain. Keats's punctuation and capitalization are reproduced as printed.

Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
Not to the sensual ear, but, more endear'd,
Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone:

Bold Lover, never, never canst thou kiss,
Though winning near the goal — yet, do not grieve;
She cannot fade, though thou hast not thy bliss,
For ever wilt thou love, and she be fair!

Thou, silent form, dost tease us out of thought
As doth eternity: Cold Pastoral!
When old age shall this generation waste,
Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou say'st,
"Beauty is truth, truth beauty," — that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.

Show a top-score response

Keats builds an argument for the superiority of art over experience, gives it every advantage, and then lets it fail without announcing the failure. The ode's method is to offer consolations that are logically sound and emotionally useless, and to leave the reader holding both properties at once. That refusal to resolve is what Keats elsewhere called negative capability, and it is visible in the poem's syntax before it is visible in its conclusions.

The second stanza opens with a proposition stated as though it were settled. "Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard / Are sweeter" is followed by "therefore", which announces a deduction. The logic is genuine: an imagined melody cannot disappoint, cannot end and cannot be played badly. Keats is not setting up a straw position. He is giving the argument for imagined perfection its strongest form so that its cost can be measured honestly.

The cost appears in the same stanza's imagery. "Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone" asks for music without sound, received by something without ears. The line is beautiful and impossible, and the impossibility is exactly the objection: the perfection on offer is available only on terms that exclude anyone from experiencing it. Keats does not state this. He writes a line that cannot be imagined and lets the reader notice.

The address to the lover makes the paradox structural rather than decorative. The figures on the urn are permanent because they cannot move, and unfulfilled for precisely the same reason. There is no adjustment available: the condition guaranteeing that she will never fade is the condition guaranteeing he will never arrive. Keats has located a case where the good and the deprivation have one cause, so the situation cannot be improved without being destroyed.

The consolation is then offered and allowed to fail in the reader's hands. "Yet, do not grieve; / She cannot fade" is true, and it is useless, and Keats declines to say which matters more. A poet reaching after fact and reason would close the stanza with a judgment. The sound carries what the argument denies: "never, never canst thou kiss" is the only doubled word in the passage, and the repetition insists on the loss at the exact moment the sentence is denying that the loss counts.

By the final stanza the speaker's attitude has hardened. "Cold Pastoral!" is an exclamation of something close to resentment, and the adjective reverses the poem's earlier warmth. The urn "dost tease us out of thought / As doth eternity", where teasing is neither instruction nor comfort but a provocation with no payoff. The speaker has spent four stanzas trying to enter the urn's world and is now describing the wall.

"When old age shall this generation waste, / Thou shalt remain" grants the urn's victory and names its price in the same sentence. The urn survives because it was never alive, and it will console "other woe / Than ours" because it cannot know ours. Keats has made permanence and sympathy mutually exclusive, which is the ode's real finding.

The closing statement must be attributed correctly, and most editions supply the quotation marks that settle it. "Beauty is truth, truth beauty" is what the urn says. The poem has spent fifty lines establishing what the urn cannot know: it has no experience of change, loss or death, which is precisely why its figures are permanent. A maxim spoken by a speaker the poem has shown to be ignorant of mortality is evidence about that speaker, not a thesis. Whether the final clause is the urn's too or the poet's reply is genuinely undecidable on the page, and Keats leaves it so, which is the last and most complete demonstration of the technique the whole ode has been practicing.

Comparison 1 · 60 minutes

Compare how the two passages below use an extended image to manage a situation the speaker cannot control.

Directions

You have sixty minutes. Organize by point of comparison, with both texts in every paragraph. A block-structured essay will not score.

Establish the shared ground quickly and spend the essay on the divergence.

Source A: Donne

Source: John Donne, "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning", written about 1611, published 1633. Public domain. Spelling modernized as in standard editions.

If they be two, they are two so
As stiff twin compasses are two;
Thy soul, the fixed foot, makes no show
To move, but doth, if the other do.

And though it in the center sit,
Yet when the other far doth roam,
It leans and hearkens after it,
And grows erect, as that comes home.

Such wilt thou be to me, who must,
Like the other foot, obliquely run;
Thy firmness makes my circle just,
And makes me end where I begun.

Source B: Eliot

Source: T. S. Eliot, "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock", 1915. Public domain. Eliot's punctuation and line breaks are reproduced as printed.

Let us go then, you and I,
When the evening is spread out against the sky
Like a patient etherised upon a table;

And indeed there will be time
To wonder, "Do I dare?" and, "Do I dare?"
Time to turn back and descend the stair,
With a bald spot in the middle of my hair.

And I have known the eyes already, known them all —
The eyes that fix you in a formulated phrase,
And when I am formulated, sprawling on a pin,
When I am pinned and wriggling on the wall,
Then how should I begin?

Show a top-score response

Both poems hand a speaker an extended image drawn from outside the vocabulary of love poetry, and both speakers face a situation their will cannot settle. Donne's image resolves the situation by producing a proof; Eliot's images accumulate without ever reaching a claim. The same technique that demonstrates mastery in 1611 becomes the evidence of paralysis in 1915, and tracking how each poem uses its figure is the clearest way to see what happened to the confidence of English poetry in between.

The sources of the two images are already opposed in a way that matters. Donne reaches for a drawing compass, an instrument with fixed mechanical properties that can be checked by anyone who has used one. Eliot reaches for a body under anaesthetic, a condition defined by the absence of agency. A speaker who selects an instrument has chosen something he can operate; a speaker who selects a sedated patient has chosen something that is operated on. Neither poem states this, and both arrange for the reader to feel it.

The decisive difference is whether the image is completed. Donne follows the compass through at least four correspondences, each a real behavior of the tool: the fixed foot pivots although it appears still, "leans and hearkens after" the traveling one, "grows erect, as that comes home", and finally its steadiness is what "makes my circle just". Because each mapping is verifiable, the figure survives being pushed and delivers a conclusion. Eliot's etherised patient, by contrast, is dropped the instant it appears. No property of anaesthesia is developed, the patient never returns, and the poem moves on to fog, coffee spoons, a pinned insect and a crab, none of which is followed through either.

That difference in completion produces opposite relations to time. Donne's last line, "makes me end where I begun", is a geometric necessity: a circle closes if the center holds. The speaker's return is guaranteed by a property of the figure, so the image does not describe the future, it secures it. Eliot's "there will be time" is repeated until it becomes an evasion, and the only outcome his images secure is deferral. "Do I dare?" rhymes with "stair" and then with "hair", so the sequence descends from an existential question to a receding hairline in three lines while the rhyme scheme functions perfectly. Donne uses form to reach a conclusion; Eliot uses intact form around content that has stopped arriving anywhere.

Both speakers are being observed, and their responses to observation diverge completely. Donne's poem opens by insisting that the lovers' parting be soundless, with "no tear-floods, nor sigh-tempests", precisely so that "the laity" cannot read it. Observation is a problem he solves by controlling the display. Prufrock has "known the eyes already, known them all", and the eyes fix him "in a formulated phrase". He is not managing how he is seen; he is describing having already been categorized, and the image he reaches for, "sprawling on a pin", makes him a specimen rather than an agent.

It is worth conceding that the two situations are not equivalent, because a strong comparison should not overstate its pairing. Donne's speaker is married, addressing a woman who is present, about a temporary absence. Prufrock is addressing an unspecified "you" about an approach he has not made and probably will not. Some of Donne's confidence is supplied by his circumstances rather than his character, and an essay that treats the difference as purely temperamental has flattened both poems.

But the formal evidence survives that concession. Donne's stanza form is regular, each quatrain advancing one step of an argument, with logical connectors, "if", "though", "yet", doing visible work at the joints. Eliot's free verse lets lines expand and contract around the speaker's hesitations, and his connectors are mostly "and", which adds without concluding. One poem is built out of reasoning and the other out of accumulation, and that is a difference in what each poet believes a poem can accomplish.

The comparison therefore shows something neither poem states alone. The metaphysical conceit and the modernist image are the same instrument, an unexpected figure held long enough to think with, and what separates them is confidence that thinking arrives anywhere. Donne's compass proves a claim about fidelity; Prufrock's images postpone a question he never asks. Three centuries apart, the technique is intact and the belief that it can settle anything has gone.

Comparison 2 · 60 minutes

Compare how the two passages below use form and sound to respond to a loss of certainty.

Directions

You have sixty minutes. Organize by point of comparison. Analyze sound and structure, not only statement.

Do not settle for "both express doubt". Name what each poet does that the other does not.

Source A: Arnold

Source: Matthew Arnold, "Dover Beach", 1867. Public domain. Arnold's punctuation is reproduced as printed.

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth's shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.

Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain.

Source B: Yeats

Source: W. B. Yeats, "The Second Coming", 1919. Public domain. Yeats's punctuation is reproduced as printed.

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Show a top-score response

Arnold and Yeats both describe an order that has stopped holding, and both use a single sustained figure to do it. The difference is what each figure permits. Arnold's tide can return, which is why his poem can end with a proposal; Yeats's spiral only widens, which is why his ends with a question about what is coming next. The images are not decoration in either poem, and reading them closely settles most of what separates Victorian doubt from modernist diagnosis.

Both poets choose a physical process rather than an abstraction, and both choose one that happens gradually. Arnold's sea withdraws; Yeats's falcon spirals out of earshot. Neither collapse involves an attack, a breaking or a decision by anyone, which is the shared claim: the loss they describe is what happens when a bond is not maintained rather than when it is severed. Establishing that much takes a paragraph, and the essay's work is in what follows.

The two figures differ in one property that determines everything else. A tide goes out and comes back, and Arnold knows it, which is why he writes that the Sea of Faith "was once, too, at the full". The image contains the memory of fullness and the structural possibility of return, even though the poem offers no expectation of one. Yeats's gyre has no such property. A widening spiral does not narrow, and the falcon that passes out of earshot cannot be recalled by a voice it can no longer hear. Arnold has chosen a figure that grieves; Yeats has chosen one that forecloses.

Sound carries the difference as much as sense. Arnold's "melancholy, long, withdrawing roar" is built from long vowels and unstressed syllables that slow the line to the pace of an ebbing tide, and his line lengths vary throughout so the verse never settles into a pattern. A poem about the loss of stable ground is written in a form that supplies none. Yeats's opening is the opposite: "Turning and turning in the widening gyre" is regular, driven and repetitive, and the repeated present participles make the motion continuous and unstoppable. Arnold's form fails to settle; Yeats's refuses to stop.

Punctuation marks a further divergence. Yeats's third line, "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold", joins two statements with a semicolon and no connective, so the reader must decide whether the center's failure caused the falling apart or followed it. The relation is withheld, which is fragmentation in miniature. Arnold's syntax explains itself: "But now I only hear" announces the turn, and "for the world, which seems" supplies the reason for the appeal that precedes it. Arnold still believes the parts of an argument should be connected for the reader. Yeats does not.

The endings then diverge as the figures require. Arnold proposes a substitute: "Ah, love, let us be true / To one another." The proposal is immediately undermined by the catalog that follows, since a world with "neither joy, nor love, nor light" cannot obviously sustain the fidelity he is requesting, and the poem does not resolve whether the appeal is courage or desperation. Yeats proposes nothing. His closing antithesis, "The best lack all conviction, while the worst / Are full of passionate intensity", uses the most orderly device the eighteenth century built to deliver the claim that moral quality and certainty have become inversely related. The form is borrowed from an age of proportion and loaded with the announcement that proportion has failed.

It should be conceded that the two poems are not doing the same job, and an essay that ignores this overstates the comparison. Arnold is writing a private address to one person in a hotel room; Yeats is writing a public prophecy about a civilization. Some of Arnold's intimacy and some of Yeats's grandeur follow from the scale each chose rather than from any difference in what they believed.

Even so, the scales themselves are evidence. Arnold turns to a private relationship because he still expects that something human might substitute for what has withdrawn. Yeats turns to history and myth because he does not, and because the falcon image has already established that nothing local can be repaired once the distance has opened. The comparison shows that fifty years converted a poem that mourns a certainty into a poem that has stopped looking for a replacement.

Argument 1 · 60 minutes

Is difficulty a defect in poetry? Take a position and defend it, using texts studied this year.

Directions

You have sixty minutes. State your claim in the first paragraph and name the warrant that connects your evidence to it.

Present the counterargument at full strength, concede what is true, and refute by distinguishing rather than contradicting.

Show a top-score response

Difficulty is not a defect when it is doing work the poem could not otherwise do, and is a defect whenever it is not. The warrant behind that claim is that a poem is an instrument for producing an experience in a reader, so any feature should be judged by whether it contributes to that experience rather than by whether it is pleasant. This makes the question empirical, text by text, and dissolves the general defense of obscurity along with the general complaint about it.

Start with a case where difficulty is clearly earning its place. Yeats's "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold" withholds the causal relation between its two clauses. There is no connective, and the reader has to decide whether the failure of the center produced the falling apart or resulted from it. That work is not an obstacle to the line's meaning; it is the meaning, because a poem about the loss of an organizing principle cannot organize its own grammar without contradicting itself. A clarified version, "the centre cannot hold, and so things fall apart", is easier and says something the poem does not believe.

The same test vindicates Donne. The compass conceit demands that a reader hold a mechanical image across three stanzas and check each correspondence against how the instrument behaves. That is genuine effort. But the poem's claim is that separation is not division, and a claim of that kind requires proof rather than assertion. The difficulty is the proof, since the reader who follows the geometry has verified the conclusion instead of being told it. Remove the labor and the poem becomes a compliment.

Eliot supplies the hardest case for my position and should be faced rather than avoided. "Prufrock" is difficult in a different way: it accumulates images that go nowhere, drops the etherised patient after one line, and offers no resolution to any of its questions. This looks like difficulty without purpose. It is not, but only because the poem's subject is a man who cannot complete anything, so a poem that completed its own figures would describe paralysis in a form that contradicts it. The defense works here and would not work for a poem about something else, which is exactly the point.

The strongest objection is not that difficult poetry is unpleasant. It is that difficulty functions as a gate. A poem built on unmarked allusions to Dante, the Bible and Jacobean drama is legible to readers with a particular education and opaque to everyone else, and the opacity is not distributed randomly. Eliot's own criticism made the case for a tradition that a reader must already possess, and the effect of that position is to restrict serious poetry to people who had the schooling to receive it. Wordsworth had argued the opposite in 1800 and wrote poems about vagrants and children in the real language of men, and he was not obviously wrong to.

That objection is substantially correct and should be conceded without softening. Modernist difficulty did narrow poetry's audience, the narrowing was foreseeable, and appeals to the seriousness of the work do not answer a complaint about access.

But the objection identifies a cost rather than a defect, and the distinction matters. A poem may be worth its cost, and the test is whether the difficulty produces something unavailable at a lower price. Yeats's withheld connective and Donne's sustained geometry both do. Difficulty that merely signals seriousness, or that could be removed without changing what the reader experiences, fails the same test and should be called what it is.

There is also a reply the objection has not accounted for. Wordsworth's plain language was itself difficult in 1800, because readers trained on Pope's couplets found poems about idiot boys and discharged soldiers unintelligible as poetry. What counts as difficult is historically produced, and much of what now reads as accessible was once an offense against expectation. That does not excuse a gate; it does mean that a poem's difficulty is partly a fact about its first readers rather than about the poem.

The position that survives is narrower than either side usually wants. Difficulty must earn itself in each poem, by producing an experience that clarity would destroy, and where it cannot show that, the complaint against it is correct.

Argument 2 · 60 minutes

Should a final year of school spend its time on a thousand years of one national literature, or on contemporary writing? Take a position and defend it.

Directions

You have sixty minutes. Take a clear position rather than surveying both sides. Name your warrant and address the strongest objection.

Use specific evidence from this year's texts.

Show a top-score response

A final year should spend most of its time on the historical range, and the warrant is worth stating plainly: the purpose of a literature course is to make a student able to read texts nobody assigns them, not to have read a particular list. On that criterion the old material wins, because reading capacity is built by encountering forms a student cannot decode on arrival, and contemporary writing is largely written in conventions they already possess.

The evidence for this is specific rather than sentimental. A student who has worked through the alliterative line, the sonnet's two divisions, the heroic couplet, blank verse, the dramatic monologue and free verse can open an unfamiliar poem and identify what it is doing before they know what it says. That is a transferable capability, and every one of those forms had to be learned, because none of them is the default a twenty-first-century reader brings. A year of contemporary poetry would teach one convention, the one the student already half knows.

Historical range also makes formal choices legible as choices. McKay's decision to write about racial violence in a Shakespearean sonnet means nothing to a reader who does not know what the sonnet had been for four centuries. Yeats loading a balanced antithesis with the claim that the best lack conviction is invisible to someone who has not seen Pope use the same device to express settled proportion. Meaning of this kind is relational, and a course confined to one period cannot supply the relation.

The strongest objection is not that old books are boring, which is a teaching problem. It is that the sequence itself makes a claim. A syllabus running Beowulf, Chaucer, Shakespeare, Pope, Wordsworth, Dickens, Eliot presents a particular selection as the shape of English literature, and students read the shape of the syllabus as a statement about what matters. The list was assembled by people with assumptions, most of the names are men, and the omissions are not random. Contemporary writing, by contrast, includes voices that the historical canon excluded by the ordinary operation of who was permitted to publish.

This should be conceded in full, because it is accurate. Any chronological syllabus disguises editorial judgment as historical fact, and saying that the year is about technique does not make the selection neutral.

But the objection identifies a defect in a particular reading list rather than in historical range as such. The list can include Margery Kempe, Aphra Behn, Mary Shelley, Christina Rossetti, Elizabeth Barrett Browning and Virginia Woolf without ceasing to be chronological, and doing so strengthens the formal argument rather than diluting it, since Woolf's solution to the narrator problem is only legible beside Conrad's. The remedy for a narrow canon is a wider one.

A second reply is that the historical texts are frequently more radical than the contemporary ones a course would substitute. Swift's persona, Blake's paired contraries, Browning's murderer given full control of his own poem, and Woolf dissolving the narrator entirely are formally more extreme than most prize-winning novels published this decade. The assumption that older means safer is a common one and does not survive contact with the material.

There is a real cost, and the honest version of this argument names it. Students leave such a year unable to discuss the literature currently being written, and they lose the experience of reading something whose reputation has not been settled for them, which is the only way to learn to judge. That is a genuine loss and cannot be argued away.

The reasonable design follows from that concession rather than ignoring it. A chronological spine with a contemporary unit at the end, where students apply the formal vocabulary of the year to work no teacher can hand them the verdict on, preserves the capability and recovers the judgment. What it should not do is invert the proportions, because the tools have to exist before there is anything to apply them with.

Unit recap

Unit recap

0:00 / 0:00

Animated recap with on-screen narration. Turn on Voice to have it read aloud (uses your device's built-in voice). Pressing play counts as your one free video.

Free preview complete

That's the end of the free preview.

You've opened five lessons, which is as much as we can show without a subscription. Everything you've already opened stays available; use the outline on the left to go back to it.

Book a tutor instead